Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Conason: No Obama Obits, Please

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:55 PM
Original message
Joe Conason: No Obama Obits, Please
http://www.observer.com/2010/politics/no-obama-obits-please


No Obama Obits, Please

By Joe Conason
January 19, 2010 | 1:36 p.m


Having taken the oath of office just one year ago, Barack Obama is a flashing meteor that sputtered out too soon—or so the national media narrative tells us. According to this story line, the young president is a presumptuous liberal who disappointed his own idealistic followers while irritating everyone else. At ABC News, the leading tipsters at The Note already speak of a “final judgment,” so we may soon hear declarations of a “failed presidency” from Washington’s pundit herd.

After a run of extraordinary luck that helped get him into the White House, Mr. Obama is indeed confronting his share of trouble. He may well encounter more and worse as the midterm election approaches. But he and his critics should remember the last time a Democratic president had to listen to the drafting of his own political obituary.

Those premature farewells came early in Bill Clinton’s first term.

snip//

If scored by his legislative attainments, Mr. Obama is a highly effective president. In fact, the scrupulously nonpartisan Congressional Quarterly rated him the most effective president of the past five decades, as measured by Congressional votes on which he took a position, either yea or nay. When he enunciated a clear position in the House and Senate, his success rate was 96.7 percent—a number that surpassed the previous records held by Lyndon Baines Johnson and Dwight Eisenhower.

If scored by his campaign promises, Mr. Obama also wins high marks.

That judgment also comes from a respected nonpartisan source, the Pulitzer Prize–winning political Web site known as Politifact.com.

Tracking in detail the progress of 500 policy pledges made during the 2008 campaign, Politifact has assembled an “Obameter” that rates each promise as kept, broken, compromised or “in the works.” Their finding is that he has made good on 91 promises so far and broken only 14; 275 are in the works, meaning that he is seeking to fulfill them, and 87 are stalled, which indicates little progress. For a president who has yet to complete his first year, those are not only decent ratings but a strong indication of good faith.


Still, Mr. Obama’s approval ratings have fallen sharply, and his party seems headed for a midterm spanking. Those declines are partly cyclical and normal, and partly the fallout from economic and military conditions that he inherited after nearly a decade of Republican misrule. But they are also owed in part to his administration’s mistakes, in pursuing a stimulus program that was too small and scattered, and a health care reform that is too compromised and timid.

But for now he also suffers the lagging effect of his legislative successes (including health care, if it finally passes), which voters will not feel until many months from now.

The Clinton experience tells us that it is far too soon to dismiss the Obama presidency—and that the loud stampede of the journalistic herd is almost always misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I do not give a flying fuck what those so-called journalists say.
They are all owned by their corporate overlords, and are busy spewing the corporate line.

It IS far too soon to dismiss the Obama presidency, but he'd better get cracking anyway.

Obama has upset a great many Democrats, including me.

He needs to start using that bully pulpit he has, and the sooner the better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I just wish the 'journalists' were truthful and didn't insert their
opinions or corporate agenda so often. They are absolutely not informing the public and don't even deserve the title of 'journalist'-that would be most of them, not all.

As for your displeasure, it apparently is shared by many. Me, he's not done everything the way I would have liked either. But I cannot help but consider my disgust for the past 8 years, and feel the need to give the man some time. Judging from the accomplishments voiced in this article, he's dancing as fast as he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Actual question from Scott Brown's presser today....
... "you said this morning that your election was NOT a referendum on Obama, are you sure about that?"

I'm not kidding. Actual question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Look Bush tried to privatize social security
and repugs got swept in 08. Now Obama's idea of health care is to cut Medicare by $500 Billion. Sorry, he lost the old folks period. They won't be back and no, the repugs won't try that trick for awhile.

These talking heads are the Rahm types that say "Don't worry about the base." So how's that working out guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC