Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The WSW probably has the best analysis of the MA election out there

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
inthebrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 04:35 AM
Original message
The WSW probably has the best analysis of the MA election out there
It's pretty spot on. Note the decline in voter turnout from the presidential to this sentorial election. Rather significant. And the Media said the turnout was good.

Republican wins Massachusetts Senate race
By Patrick Martin
20 January 2010
Republican Scott Brown won the special election Tuesday to fill the US Senate seat from Massachusetts left vacant by the death of Edward Kennedy, who held the seat for the Democrats for 47 years. Democrat Martha Coakley conceded shortly before 9:30 p.m., as vote-counting in 80 percent of precincts showed her trailing by a margin of 52 percent to 47 percent.


The defeat in Massachusetts is a major blow to the Democratic Party and the outcome of growing popular disillusionment with the Obama administration. Brown won by 5 percentage points over Coakley in a state which Obama carried in the presidential election by 26 points just over one year ago.


In the 2008 election, Obama received 1,891,083 votes in Massachusetts compared to 1,104,284 for his Republican opponent, John McCain. Brown appears likely, when all votes are counted, to match or actually exceed McCain’s total, while Coakley’s vote represents a dropoff of about 50 percent from Obama’s total 14 months ago.


It must be said that this is a defeat the Democratic Party made possible and richly deserved. Obama’s right-wing policies on the bank bailout, his cost-cutting healthcare overhaul and his continuation and expansion of the wars of the Bush administration have antagonized millions who supported him in 2008 and alienated Democratic Party base voters.


Anecdotal reports indicated light turnout in African-American and other minority districts in Boston, Springfield and other cities, and a comparatively heavy turnout in more upscale middle-class suburbs, particularly around Boston, where Brown rolled up large margins. Brown was leading among union members in pre-election polls, in part because of the Obama administration’s support for a tax on higher-cost employer-sponsored healthcare plans.


The Obama administration and the Democratic-controlled Congress have been indifferent to the economic distress of broad masses of workers and middle-class people, while doling out trillions in federal resources to prop up the banks and enable them to return to profitability and dispense gargantuan bonuses to executives and traders.


The unemployment rate in Massachusetts was more than 9 percent last summer, and it remains above 8.5 percent, double the level in 2007. That figure does not include the tens of thousands of workers no longer actively seeking jobs or working only part-time.


It is hard to top the cynicism of Obama’s visit to Massachusetts Sunday, when he campaigned with Coakley at a rally at Northeastern University in Boston, hailing her as a fighter against Wall Street and denouncing Brown as “another vote for the banks.” Given the administration’s record over the past year, Obama has zero credibility posturing as a populist opponent of the big financial interests, and that was reflected at the polls on Tuesday.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/jan2010/mass-j20.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm... Guess WSWS has never heard of Mitt Romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ooooh, this is what you read
Well I see. $700 billion stimulus is "indifferent". Well alrighty then.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. this mirrors my opinon that it was Democratic voter apathy more than anything
Young "idealists" as well as we old fogies have been ignored and taken for granted since Nov. 2008--there was no "voter backlash" so much as general drifting away, a dying of interest. I can't speak for all Dem voters in Massachusetts (& I myself am not a Mass. voter), but, for me, that drifting away started happening when I saw Max Baucus making deals with insurance companies while doctors and nurses were arrested for trying to get their "promised" "seat at the table." Virtually every progressive idea, beginning with promoting of rights for gays (symbolically squelched on Inauguration Day by choice of Rick Warren), legalization of marijuana a day or two after Inauguration, prosecution of Bush war criminals, and single-payer health insurance has been ridiculed and not even considered.

The elaborate charade to make it appear that a "public option," let alone single-payer Medicare for all, "couldn't get the votes" did it for me--that was when I reregistered as an Independent, figuring the Democrats were simply another version of Republicans, esp. with Rahm Emmanuel thumbing his nose at me, and that Yes We Can had become a long string of No We Can'ts.

I can't be alone in that feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Nope, you aren't alone n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. The Democrats couldn't get what you wanted fast enough
And what they could get was not good enough for you.

Enjoy your Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. who cares about republicans when we have the DLC?
the "democrats" couldn't kiss the repukes' asses fast enough, is what you mean.

and I don't know what you mean by "you"--ask the voters of Massachusetts who didn't bother voting for coke versus pepsi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Narraback Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe this will get him FDR like...
For get wall street get after main street....

We shall see.

I suggest WPA - New Deal - add a new WPA and put 5 million people to work! Yes, that is Change I can believe in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh fuck wsws.
What the fuck is wrong with this place.

Fuck the new DU. I'm out.

Fuck all the mother fucking idiots dumping all over Pres. Obama. You all deserve every fucking thing you get from here on out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. adios.

don't let the door hit you. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. promises, promises ...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. The Republicans will always win in the end, since they don't have these
supposed allies who desert when the Dems can't get what they want within the year.

Fuck them and the Republicans they are happy to see in office just to punish the Dems for not getting them every single goddamned thing they want and stomping off because we just aren't good enough for them.

I'd rather be in the minority and do without these babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. good riddance....
I'm so tired of all the cheerleaders with their heads stuck firmly in the sand.

Yep, he's probably better than McCain would have been. Probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Americans voted for change in 2008
not a continuation of Bush`s policies, Bush`s people and and obscene corporatism. Many people on DU continue to make excuses for President Obama, even though they were against many of these same policies (and attitudes) under George W. Bush. Obama would be in much better shape today had he listened to "the people" instead of his DLC corporatist handler, Rahm Emanuel. President Obama tries way too hard to make friends with everyone in the room and not hard enough to keep his promises.

Many here on DU continue to mock and deride Progressive Democrats, but I guarantee you our agenda is in line with what a majority of people want right now. Many people vote on issues, not party. Just ask all those Massachusetts Independents who voted yesterday.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inthebrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Brown's totals matched McCain's from the presidential
I wouldn't fall for that "he attracted all these independants".

The Indies here lean more left than the Dems.

Brown got the Reps and the totals show the Tea Baggers had no impact here. The Left stayed home cause the party has moved sharply to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. That's interesting...
Yea and you could predict this kind of thing would happen...i just never thought it would happen so quickly. Disenchanted dem voters says it all...I certainly wont be going out to vote unless things change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Nicely said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. No your agenda is not the majorities
Half the people are Republicans for god's sake.

The Republicans will not give you what you want. The Democrats can't get you what you want fast enough and not 100% perfection of what you want, mainly because 50% are still Republicans.

go home and cry and stamp your childish feet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inthebrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. The people of MA by opting to stay home decided the Dems aint giving them what they want
And they aren't swayed by the Republicans at all. The turnout for Brown clearly shows the right wing message does not resonate with the voters at large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
18. SHE FUCKIN WENT ON VACATION!!!!! The article leaves that part out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. But he apparently didn't get as many votes as the President did.....
.... that's all I need to hear. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Brown?
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 11:48 AM by bigwillq
How would he? He got the votes needed to win. That's what counts. Not sure I get your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC