Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Jim Webb wants further votes on health care legislation put on hold until Brown's seated.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:38 AM
Original message
Senator Jim Webb wants further votes on health care legislation put on hold until Brown's seated.
Per TPM:

"In many ways the campaign in Massachusetts became a referendum not only on health care reform but also on the openness and integrity of our government process. It is vital that we restore the respect of the American people in our system of government and in our leaders. To that end, I believe it would only be fair and prudent that we suspend further votes on health care legislation until Senator-elect Brown is seated."

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/health-care-comes-to-screeching-halt-sen-webb-no-hcr-votes-until-brown-seated.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's only a small sacrifice
Pushing the revised bill through the Senate again would probably be impossible in the time remaining. Webb isn't calling for abandoning it altogether - at least, not with that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. He's being seated tomorrow.......
so it appears that President Webb got his wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And I'm betting Sen Webb knew that when he said it. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. LOL@ President Webb
Maybe in 2012 Virginia would have a say on deciding the presidential election in 2012?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. They should. They did in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Naah, I thought it was Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I think all of the states have a "say"......
I just don't think any get all of the "say"...

I don't think that 2008 was a year that any particular state had a bigger "say"...
since Obama won so many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. I agree
but I thought given the attention paid to Ohio by the M$M, bittersweet that we won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Til the Senate voted, Webb was on the fence. So, forgive me if
I've lost quite a bit of faith in Webb. He's flitting in the wind imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's what we get for getting all fuzzy about a former Republican
turned Democrat.

Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. zactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. People are "unreccing" this stuff like somehow that'll make it go away...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. It is strange.
Kinda like sticking your fingers in your ears and saying LALALALALALALALA...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why do Dems cave time after time after time?
I hate it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayla9170 Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. No Health Care Reform.....this year.........
Or any year. We can just thank ourselves now...............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. Fine
Skip the Senate, pass the Senate's bill in the House, seat Brown, send the bill to the president, and then do a reconciliation fix of the taxes in the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. There is another way. Pass legislation fixing the Senate bill first
"If it comes down to that Senate bill or nothing, I think we're going to end up with nothing, because I don't hear a lot of support on our side for that bill," said Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA). "I've lost my faith in anything happening quickly that requires Senate action.

"If she loses, it's over," Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) said this evening in New York.

Two high-profile progressives--Reps. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) and Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)--said the only way they could sign on to the Senate bill is if it was accompanied immediately, or even preceded by, a separate bill, making a number of major preemptive changes to what they regard as an inferior package.

"It would have to be so quick that they happen at the same time," Weiner said. "We're in full whistling past the graveyard mode in there.... They're talking as if, like, what our deal is, what our negotiations are with the White House. Yeah, I mean if the last line is 'pigs fly out ass' or something like that.... We've gotta recognize we have an entirely different scenario tomorrow."

"You should do the other stuff first and then pass the Senate bill," Nadler told me. "I don't see how I could vote for the Senate bill," otherwise.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/determined-or-delusional-house-leadership-sounds-optimistic-on-hcr.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayla9170 Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. It's not going to get done................
No health care.....that's it. Health care is over.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. I don't think you can do what Nadler suggests
You can't make the changes on a bill not yet passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
18. Doesn't Mass already have health care reform?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought a health care bill passed in the commonwealth while Romney was Gov.

So, if they've already got it, why would Mass voters use their senate race as a "referendum" on health care reform if they're going to have it whether the rest of the country does or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC