Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colombia's coca crop-spraying caused genetic damage to 10% Ecuador border citizens: Study

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 08:56 PM
Original message
Colombia's coca crop-spraying caused genetic damage to 10% Ecuador border citizens: Study
Colombia's coca crop-spraying caused genetic damage to 10% Ecuador border citizens: Study
Friday, 10 June 2011 16:31
Marguerite Cawley

Aerial crop fumigations by the Colombian government may have caused irreversible genetic damage to 10% of Ecuadorean citizens living on the country's northeastern border, revealed a study conducted by the Universidad de las Americas in Quito.

The university's Biomedical Investigations Institute carried out medical diagnoses of 521 people from communities on Ecuador's border with Colombia between 2009-2010, with the goal of studying the social, health and genetic effects of the herbicide glyphosate, sprayed aerially by the Colombian government to combat the growth of coca crops.

Of those studied, 10% were shown to have developed genetic damage, with the study stating that 5% "could develop cancer," 3% " give birth to children with malformations," and 2% " have fertility problems," reported Caracol Radio.

In 2008, the government of Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa sued Colombia in an international court for "grave damages" caused by the fumigations that had taken place between 2000-2006.

More:
http://colombiareports.com/colombia-news/news/16900-colombias-coca-crop-fumigations-affected-up-to-10-ecuador-border-residents-study.html
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ecuador was begging Colombia years ago to stop spraying so close to the border
that it was destroying crops, livestock, harming human beings, as well. Colombia's government simply blew them off.

If I understand it correctly, the spraying is directed by USAID, and Plan Colombia, all financed by the hard-earned dollars of U.S. taxpayers.

These pictures were created by Colombian and Ecuadorean children who were assigned by their teachers the task of painting what they see when the sprayer planes work in their neighborhoods.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com.nyud.net:8090/3080/2295267259_8d7d2910a5.jpg http://farm4.static.flickr.com.nyud.net:8090/3155/2295267815_b6005f9fb7.jpg

http://laniel.free.fr.nyud.net:8090/INDEXES/GraphicsIndex/Dessins/Dessins-Images/Plan_Colombia_Fumigation0.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com.nyud.net:8090/3045/2295267055_97c0910ec7.jpg http://farm4.static.flickr.com.nyud.net:8090/3233/2296060136_363ec4915f.jpg


More images:
http://mydd.com/users/redstatehatemonitor/posts/bush-policy-of-spraying-poison-on-children

An excellent description of the aftermath of Colombia's spraying on campesinos' farms:

Colombia: Chemical Spraying of Coca Poisoning Villages

by Hugh O'Shaughnessy, The Observer (London)
June 17th, 2001
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11081


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gbscar Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yet another of the numerous tragic consequences of a failed, corrupt and inhumane drug policy (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Spraying Crops, Eradicating People
Spraying Crops, Eradicating People

"We always used to have a pharmacy in the jungle. But now we can’t find the trees and animals that we need. The animals and fish have disappeared. The birds, too. We have never seen anything like this before. It has to be the result of the spraying. We notice the effects immediately after the area is sprayed. Birds, animals, and fish begin to disappear within a few weeks. The health effects linger for weeks, and even longer."

-Indigenous Shuar leader from Sucumbíos, Ecuador


~snip~
What Are They Spraying?

Paul Wellstone, the late Democratic U.S. senator from Minnesota and critic of U.S. military aid to Colombia, doubted the accuracy and safety of the U.S.-sponsored drug-eradication program in Colombia. Wellstone, visiting the Colombia department of Putumayo in December 2000, was assured that the spraying, using satellite images, would target coca fields without harming food crops. However, "on the very first flyover by the crop duster, the U.S. Senator, the U.S. Ambassador to Colombia, the Lieutenant Colonel of the Colombian National Police, and other Embassy and congressional staffers were fully doused with the sticky, possibly dangerous Roundup," according to Jim Farrell, Wellstone’s spokesperson, in a statement widely released after the event. The group was standing on a mountainside overlooking a coca field.

This event, in addition to providing effective media coverage against the spraying, called into question a number of concerns about aerial eradication campaigns. Wellstone found that despite satellite imaging, the spraying was imprecise--mostly due to "drift." Because the small fixed-wing crop duster airplanes that spray the herbicides often fly too high to accurately target the coca crops, crosswinds can blow the herbicide hundreds of feet to non-target areas, causing the destruction of other crops or rainforest, or the contamination of bodies of water. Wellstone knew the spraying was going to occur and had access to medical care after his glyphosate bath, but the communities being sprayed have neither luxury and are unable to find information about the ingredients, concentrations, or intended form of application of the herbicides. Although the U.S. Embassy in Bogotá warns local citizens in areas that will be sprayed and informs them of precautions to take in case of contact with the spray, the information comes too late, or not at all, for many.

~snip~
Roundup and Roundup SL are composed mainly of the chemical glyphosate. According to former U.S. ambassador to Colombia Myles Frechette, glyphosate use has been associated with problems since the mid-1990s. Sprayed as a mist, it was ineffective in windy and rainy weather, and often did not penetrate the coca leaf. Even for the less-toxic Roundup, a broad-spectrum herbicide which kills a wide range of plants, Monsanto’s own warnings highlight danger to environmental and human health:

Roundup will kill almost any green plant that is actively growing . . . Take care to spray Roundup only on the weeds you want to kill--don’t allow the spray to contact plants you like or they may die too . . . Roundup should not be applied to bodies of water such as ponds, lakes or streams as Roundup can be harmful to certain aquatic organisms . . . After an area has been sprayed with Roundup, people and pets (such as cats and dogs) should stay out of the area until it is thoroughly dry . . . We recommend that grazing animals such as horses, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, tortoises and fowl remain out of the treated area for two weeks . . . If Roundup is used to control undesirable plants around fruit or nut trees, or grapevines, allow twenty-one days before eating the fruits or nuts.<2> ,p> Although the U.S. and Colombia governments have maintained that glyphosate is less toxic than table salt or aspirin, the particular formula used in Colombia has not been approved for use in the United States, and has also been combined with surfactants, or soapy additives, in order to increase its toxicity. The surfactants include Cosmo-Flux 411F, which weighs down the glyphosate to prevent wind drift over non-targeted areas, while at the same time allowing for better penetration into the leaves of the coca and poppy plants. The U.S. government reports that the mixture contains 55 percent water, 44 percent glyphosate herbicide product, and one percent surfactant (Cosmo-Flux 411F). But the composition of Cosmo-Flux 411F, a product registered and produced in Colombia, could not be reported by the State Department for reasons of confidentiality.<3>

More:
http://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/ecuador/spraying-crops-eradicating-people
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ecuadorian farmers have been begging for help against this monstrosity for years:
February 27, 2002

Nature and Politics
Rumble from the Jungle
Ecuadorian Farmers Fight DynCorp's Chemwar on the Amazon
By Jeffrey St. Clair and Alexander Cockburn

"Imagine that scene for a moment--you are an Ecuadorian farmer, and suddenly, without notice or warning, a large helicopter approaches, and the frightening noise of the chopper blades invades the quiet. The helicopter comes closer, and sprays a toxic poison on you, your children, your livestock and your food crops. You see your children get sick, your crops die." These are the words of Bishop Jesse de Witt, president of the International Labor Rights Fund, in a letter to Paul V. Lombardi, CEO of DynCorp.

DeWitt's organization has filed suit in US federal court on behalf of 10,000 Ecuadorian peasant farmers and Amazonian Indians charging Lombardi's company with torture, infanticide and wrongful death for its role in the aerial spraying of highly toxic pesticides in the Amazonian jungle, along the border of Ecuador and Colombia. DynCorp's chances of squirming out the suit were dealt a crushing blow in January when federal judge Richard Roberts denied the company's motion to dismiss the case on grounds that their work in Colombia involved matters of national security.

DynCorp, the Reston, Virginia-based all-purpose defense contractor, is rapidly acquiring the kind of reputation for global villainy and malfeasance that used to be Bechtel's calling card in the 60s and 70s. As we reported a few weeks ago, DynCorp has been hit with a RICO suit by a former employee alleging that the company fired him after he reported improprieties by company supervisors in Bosnia to the Army CID. According to the lawsuit, those improprieties included "coworkers and supervisors literally buying and selling women for their own personal enjoyment, and employees would brag about the various ages and talents of the individual slaves they had purchased."

The very origins of the company are somewhat murky. President Harry Truman established DynCorp shortly after the end of World War II, supposedly to provide jobs for veterans and to market surplus military equipment. Certainly, DynCorp has never severed its umbilical relationship to the federal government. The billion-dollar company enjoys contracts with the CIA, Pentagon, State Department, EPA, IRS and DEA. It trains "police forces" in some of the US's most brutal client states, including El Salvador, Panama, Haiti and Bosnia. Many of its top employees were recruited from the Pentagon, the CIA or and State Department. Indeed theories are rife across Latin America, in particular, that DynCorp has always functioned as a cut-out for Pentagon and CIA covert operations.

More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/dyncorpsuit.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-11 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kicked!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC