Who is a spy and why?

[flamingdem]

http://uscubanormalization.blogspot.com/2010/07/who-is-spy-and-why.html

Friday, July 2, 2010
Who is a spy and why?

La Alborada - July 2

Posted by John McAuliff

The FBI has charged eleven people with conspiracy to act as agents of a foreign government --Russia-- without notifying the Attorney General. That's not "spying" or "being an unregistered foreign agent," but conspiracy to act as an agent. The Associated Press interpreted the news this way: "Russian agents infiltrated US society, charges say": infiltrated not the government or the Pentagon, but society. Nothing that we have found in the news so far suggests that the accused gathered any information of significance. The indictment charges that the defendants were paid or expected to be paid by Russia for their work.

The eleven defendants were arrested and jailed. Proceedings in the matter will determine whether or not they are guilty of any of the charges brought. If they are found guilty, they will surely serve time in prison.

They will never be called "dissidents," the generic name given to a number of people in Cuba who include agents of the US government. Many of them have been jailed since 2003. The evidence against the latter, obtained in part from Cuban security agents who had been posing as collaborators and also, as was the case here, by surveillance, was summarized in a book, Los Disidentes, published soon afterwards in Cuba.

The evidence showed that the dissidents were coordinated, directed, and financed by the US Interests Section in Havana, and also from Madrid. The declared independent journalists turned out to be independent from the Cuban government, but not from the US. They were told what kind of information they should generate; on their compliance depended the support, including payment in money and kind, that they received from the Interests Section, at which they often met to coordinate their activities.

The financing of dissidents --or subversives, depending on point of view-- in Cuba by the US is no secret. Congress periodically appropriates money in the millions of dollars officially earmarked to support the dissidents. When it is the US that does this, it considers it proper and necessary, a matter of course. It sees no need to make such payments a covert operation; in fact, it announces the payments proudly. The US also helps to arrange favorable media coverage for the dissidents.

The mass media never, ever, mention the evidence of control of and payment to the dissidents arrested in 2003. It, too, considers it normal that the US should sponsor them, or pretends that there is no connection, although charges of such an arrangement have become a major factor in reporting on the alleged Russian agents.

Russia is not attempting to overthrow the US government, nor could it do so; certainly not by using the kind of information that is at issue in the current case. The US no doubt has its own agents and spies in Russia, but it is not seeking to overthrow the Russian government. The US, however, is committed by law to overthrow the Cuban government, which is the ultimate goal of the blockade. Alan Gross was in Cuba surreptitiously under a grant dedicated to such a purpose. In 2003, in fact, the Bush administration served notice to states that it did not like that they could experience the same shock and awe to which Iraq was subjected.

SInce 1959, the US has sponsored and/or sheltered a variety of terrorists, such as Luis Posada Carriles, whose goal is to overthrow the government of Cuba by force. It was because of this that Cuba sent agents to Florida to gather information on what these elements were planning. That information did not remain secret, however; Cuba turned it over to the FBI. As a result, the FBI arrested the Cuban Five, who are now serving up to two consecutive life sentences.

Whatever one thinks of the Cuban government, it should not be hard to see why the Cubans would be upset at the financing and directing of US agents on the island, to the point of imprisoning them, especially considering US policy and the circumstances of 2003.

What justifies the difference in approach to the case of those charged as Russian agents and the case of the US agents in Cuba? Essentially, it comes down to two things: 1) Because we are Good and they are Bad; and 2) Because we can do it.

The policy --and law-- as to Cuba remains in effect. There is nothing to suggest that, if the Cubans did not react to the funding and direction of dissidents on the island, the US would cease to sponsor agents there. On the contrary, there would likely be more such agents in Cuba.

The US has Cuban agents in jail, and Cuba has US agents in jail. If there is the will to improve relations between the two governments, one place to start would be to exchange them.

[Peace Patriot]

1. Well reasoned--but the trouble with U.S. policy on Cuba is that it was contrived by

the Mad Hatters of Miami, and reason ain't in it. We might as well be living, literally, in Alice's Wonderland, where everything is upside down, backwards and inside out.

I've always loved that part of "Through the Looking Glass" wherein the Red Queen demands that the white roses (real roses) be PAINTED red, and her Playing Card minions dutifully proceed (under threat of "Off with your heads!") to kill all the roses with red paint, to please Her Redness.

THAT is U.S. Cuba policy--indeed, that is U.S. Latin American policy. Up is down. War is Peace. Democracy is tyranny. Fascism is democracy. And look out, peasants and Leftists and human rights workers and union leaders and teachers and anybody who tries to do anything positive, because you are, literally, going to get your head shot off, or find yourself being hacked to death, alive, and your body parts thrown into a mass grave, if you live in a country like Colombia whose narco-thug leaders are America's "best friends" in the region.

Not to mention the torture dungeon on the other end of the island of Cuba.

Up is down.

[Billy Burnett]

2. The Mad Hatters of Miami are stooges. Good cover. Where we can (mis)direct our ire.

If you've read Economic Hitmen, Shock Doctrine, The Open Veins of Latin America, A People's History of the US (Zinn), or any of the anthologies on the topic, then you get the idea.

Rapacious capitalism (murderous greed) and the US "democratic" system is the problem. The disaster capitalists need fall guys and straw men. The gusanos in Miami are just that.

Although I might enjoy hating them and their disgusting motives to a degree, I do understand that the exile cretins are not the architects of the US imperial plan for Cuba. Casa Bacardi and the Cuba Transition Project (and all of the money) simply gives them (and us) the illusion that the exiles are in charge. Nope. The plan for Cuba is sitting on the shelves of the corporate think tanks and US dept of State, and always has been.

Mr Obama illustrated it (the illusion of empowerment) perfectly when he came to Miami and pulled a 180º reversal of his lifelong position on Cuba sanctions.

The US dealings with Cuba are only when it is of benefit to US corporo/political interests. Believe me, Cubans in Cuba know this all too well. The most popular TV news/talk show in Cuba exposes this in great detail on a regular basis. They laugh at the gusanos screaming in front of the Versailles in Miami - but they don't laugh at the worms when they kidnap a child as they did to Elian, which served as a reminder to Cubans across Cuba ... children and family come first, and that is the primary drive of their system.