Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Manta Port becomes state-owned again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 04:35 AM
Original message
Manta Port becomes state-owned again
Manta Port becomes state-owned again
08 May 2010

The Port of Manta passed back to the control of the government of Ecuador from April 1 closing the door onlast year’s failed concession attempt.

It had formerly been transferred to Terminales Internacionales del Ecuador (TIDE), which abandoned the concession in February 2009.

The government had been in subsequent negotiations with an interested private bidder for the concession, but these have now collapsed. The port authority is to rehire half of the 103 employees originally contracted by TIDE.

http://www.portstrategy.com/news101/americas/manta-port-becomes-port-authority-again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
protocol rv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. And it won't work as efficienciently
unfortunately for Ecuador, their president is also headed in the wrong direction. All of these enterprises he is nationalizing will suffer from 'state organization malaise" or SOM. SOM is what turns these outfits into sleepy underperforming, slothful and distracted organizations. Eventually the infrastructure decays, and nothing works as well as it did before. It's automatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Such tired old 'Milton Friedman'/Reaganistic crapola! Gov't bad; corpos good!
It's a new day in Ecuador, with their young, energetic and hugely popular new president, Rafael Correa, and with a hugely successful leftist democracy movement that has empowered the poor majority, passed a new Constitution with a huge majority of the votes, and is establishing the principles of Ecuador's sovereign control of its resources, social justice, equality and fairness. Item no. 1 on the majority's agenda was throwing the corrupt, failed, murderous U.S. 'war on drugs' out of Ecuador and gaining back control of the Manta air base, which Correa accomplished last year. Next is de-privatizing infrastructure and public works, so that public services are subjected to democratic control.

You have the typical rightwing attitude that only private gain can motivate "efficiency" ("efficiency" as to what? the rich getting richer?) and you also base your prediction of the failure of public works on corrupt models of Latin American institutions written in Washington DC and at the World Bank/IMF and implemented in prior decades by highly corrupt rightwing governments and rich elites. There is no better example of this than the privatization of the water system in Cochabamba, Bolivia, where the corrupt rightwing government handed control of the water to Bechtel Corp, and Bechtel proceeded to jack up the price of water to the poor, even charging the poorest of the poor for collecting rainwater! That is "efficiency" for the rich. It ain't "efficiency" for the poor majority. Bolivians rebelled, threw Bechtel out of their country, and elected Evo Morales as president--a close ally of Rafael Correa and other leftist leaders. Bolivians also re-wrote their Constitution, and passed it by a big majority of the votes--a Constitution, like Ecuador's, which enshrines access to water--the basis of life--as a human RIGHT.

So we will see if the brilliant new leaders of Latin America, such as Correa and Morales, can reverse a half a century of gross interference by the U.S. and its corporate puppetmasters and war profiteers and World Bank/IMF loan sharks, which included installation of extremely corrupt, rightwing governments and, in many cases, heinous dictators. They have a lot of bad history and gross interference to overcome. The kneejerk attitude that they will fail is a narrative written in Langley, in service to Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Dyncorp, Monsanto, Chiquita, Blackwater and the banksters at the World Bank/IMF, with local rich elites as the tools for defeating democracy and fairness. They WANT these democracies to fail.

I see no reason whatever to predict the failure of democracy in Ecuador, including the people gaining public control of resources and infrastructure. The ideal system is one that COMBINES the profit motive on SOME enterprises with the public spirit on others, especially on essentials, such as water works, health care, education, electrification, telecommunications and other infrastructure such as roads, ports and airports--systems and services that are essential for the public good. I see Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and other countries experimenting with various combinations of these motives--very similar to the "New Deal" era in this country--trying to find the right combination of democratic control and "free enterprise." Our system has gone off the deep end as to private profit trumping all other values, which is leading to the absolute wreckage of society, here--as it did in many Latin American countries in prior decades, especially during the World Bank/IMF period of "free trade for the rich." They suffered then what we are suffering now--the decimation of their economies and loss of public works and social services, including education, while rich U.S./EU investors laughed all the way to the bank. Innovative political movements like those in Ecuador, Bolivia and Venezuela are pioneering the way back to SANITY in the balance of these different motivations--profit vs the public good. I hope they succeed and I see no reason why they cannot. And I hope that the same idea takes hold here and succeeds. Business MUST SERVE THE PUBLIC GOOD or it is mere piracy and looting. And public control of business, and direct public control of some critically important projects, are essential to a good and decent society. We need to regain that notion of what democracy MEANS: It means the highest good for ALL, not the "freedom" of the rich to loot, plunder and oppress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hoping Latin American's progress will NOT be derailed this time, that it will only gain momentum
continually, and that our own oligarchy won't be able to reinforce its overthrow this time.

Best and highest hopes for Latin American solidarity, the only good possible future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "A communist from Northern California"?
:rofl:

---

"Unlike you, who happen to be a communist from Northern California, I happen to have seen the aftermath of nationalization in Latin America."

---

Now, now, "protocol rv," we know you've seen it all, and know it all, and we should all be silenced by your vast knowledge of everything in Latin America, but really, I didn't know that you check up on the party registrations of American DUers with whom you disagree. Care to document my membership in the Communist Party USA?

I am not a "communist," "protocol rv," although I believe in cooperation and social decency. I am in fact a great believer in "the marketplace"--that is, a REAL marketplace, not this monopolistic, predatory capitalist monster we are seeing today. I think Cuba has a great health care system which should be imitated everywhere. NO ONE should be permitted to profit from illness. That's a great idea that the Cubans have implemented. This doesn't make me a "communist." And I am very much a "New Dealer"--for strong regulation of the rich and the powerful, to benefit the poor and society in general. Beyond these things, I wouldn't want to stifle creativity or ingenuity or, as you say, "efficiency"--although I do think "efficiency" is way over-sold, and that, for instance, the high speed computers that just crashed the stock market, or the "efficiency" of private, corporate, 'TRADE SECRET' vote counting, are very, very, very wrong and should be banned. Better a slow market than a dead one. Better a nice, slow, VISIBLE vote count, than Karl Rove and Diebold stealing elections--and countries.

Business, yes. Enterprise, yes. NO monopolies. NO corporate moguls destroying our country. Society and the dignity and rights of every human being COME FIRST and business must serve those things, or be banned--and/or taken over, and/or strongly regulated.

You seem to equate social responsibility and a desire for social justice and decency, and for a balance within society of caring for the weak, preventing the strong from harming the weak, and providing a decent life for all, with "communism." You need to examine that view. It is very wrong. You have completely misunderstood me and mischaracterized me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protocol rv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. OK, I apologize
Sorry. So now that we agree on almost everything, tell me what makes you support the Cuban dictatorship so much? Do you realize it's just an oligarchy selling propaganda to justify its hold on power? And do you realize what is being entrenched in Venezuela is just a similar oligarchy run by one of the most corrupt bunches ever seen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If you're apologizing, do it. Back away from harrassing other posters.
Continuing your attack clearly says "I didn't really mean it when I apologized."

No one even partially conscious can ever doubt this poster's profound grasp of all the significant material.

If you have something worthwhile to add, discuss THAT, not other posters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. There have been a lot of attacks on other posters lately
In fact, whole attack threads have been started. They have been started by supporters of Castro and Chavez. Curiously, you seem to have no problem with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Of course not
The double standard is comical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. What is being "entrenched" in Venezuela is REAL democracy, including transparent,
honest, aboveboard, internationally certified elections, the election of REAL representatives of the people, the expansion of power to include the previously excluded vast poor majority, encouragement of citizen participation, advancement of human rights including the rights of women, gays and lesbians, African-Venezuelans, the Indigenous and others, and genuine efforts at social justice with some remarkable successes (including cutting poverty by half, cutting extreme poverty by 70%, wiping out illiteracy and a doubling of high school and college enrollment).

Previous Venezuelan governments killed hundreds of poor protestors, and gave away the oil--Venezuela's main resource--in a 10/90 split of the profits favoring multinational corporations like Exxon Mobil, while skimming off the top for the local rich elite and grossly neglecting their fellow and sister Venezuelans. The genuinely elected, very popular Chavez government--which has won elections with 60% of the vote and enjoyed comparable approval ratings--changed all that by INCLUDING the poor in the creation of government policy and by tough negotiations with the multinational oil corporations, which has resulted in a fairer 50/50 split of the profits, with Venezuela's portion supporting Venezuela's social programs, and 60/40 sovereign control of the projects. Venezuela just signed eight companies, from as many countries, and a few weeks ago signed China, to develop the Orinoco Belt on Venezuela's terms. Exxon Mobil walked out of those talks and into a "first world" court and tried to seize $12 billion of Venezuela's international cash reserves and assets, in a snit over not being larded with ALL the profits--the richest corporation on earth literally trying to take food out of poor children's mouths and books out of their hands. What a disgusting spectacle! They are now aced out of the biggest oil reserve on earth--because they wouldn't play nice--and companies like Italy's ENI are thrilled to get the business (and said so in the press conference). That's a REAL marketplace, no?, where giants don't get to rule and everybody gets a chance?

This upsets you, I think--and prompts you to make wild statements (such as calling me a "communist")--because you have some at least emotional attachment to the oil industry. You have been defending Chevron-Texaco in other threads, with regard to their enormous oil spills in Ecuador and even made a racist comment about one of the Indigenous tribe members who have sued Chevron for a cleanup and health costs. I actually don't think you are a racist, but that comment slipped out because you were so determined to exonerate Chevron-Texaco. (In regard to evidence in the trial, you said, "Testimony presented by an Indian?") That says 'emotional attachment' to me. Perhaps it is just ideological--i.e., you support Reaganonmics and Bushonomics. You think "big" is good. You think "big' should prevail. Maybe you genuinely think that Exxon Mobil or Chevron running a country is best for everybody--that the benefits of their vast wealth, as to development, will "trickle down." But if this is what you believe, you need to consider that the "benefits" of big business only had a "trickle down" effect in the USA when they were strongly subject to government regulation and taxed--back in the "New Deal" era up to the Reagan era, whereupon this country and its great progressive middle class majority began to get royally shafted--for instance, with the looting of the Savings & Loan institutions, via deregulation (these were the repositories of "the little guy"'s savings--totally ripped off) on through the Bush II era, where the looting and the shafting and the outsourcing and the deregulation and the tax cuts for the rich and the Forever War for the war profiteers has produced Great Depression II.

This is NOT capitalism. This is PIRACY. This is not democracy. This is TYRANNY by the super-rich.

Part of that tyranny is to relentlessly LIE about the achievements of governments like Venezuela's--to simply ignore their democratic and social justice advances (not to mention their 10% economic growth rate during the 2003 to 2008 period, with the most growth in the private sector), to brainwash people into thinking the opposite of the truth--that Chavez is a "dictator" and that Venezuelans are not benefiting from his administration (though they keep electing him--gee, I wonder why?), and that democratic and sovereign control by the People is bad, bad, bad, and only vastly rich multinational corporations know what is good for us. Really, I think we can measure the success of the Chavez government by the extent to which he is hated and reviled by the U.S. State Department and the corpo-fascist press.

Cuba is another victim of demonization. They are all bad; nothing good happens in Cuba. Those who treat Cuba this way simply ignore that the fact that the people torturing prisoners on the island of Cuba are doing so at the OTHER end of the island, at Guantanamo Bay. The U.S. State Department's blather about "human rights" in Cuba is a cruel joke, and worthy of Josef Stalin as to the "Big Lie" propaganda technique. Cuba's health system--achieved under communist rule--is EXCELLENT. Why shouldn't we say so? It is a FACT. It is absolutely not true that "nothing good happens in Cuba."

That is stupid. That limits our options, our thoughts, our ideas. It is anti-democratic to stupidly demonize everything about a system we don't like, in the face of the facts. And virtually everybody else in the world, including most of Latin America, recognizes this about Cuba--that it is NOT the Soviet Union (territorial aggressor, run by a mad, blood-soaked, real dictator, in the first part of its history), that the Cuban government actually has more "consent of the people" than we can brag of, in the USA, and that it has BENEFICIAL, well thought out programs--especially in health care and education.

Let's save demonization for the real demons--for instance, the Bush Junta. Let's be intelligent and assess the good and the bad in all human systems, and try to improve human systems to be more equitable, more humane, more just. And I ask you, what is "freedom" worth to a jobless, homeless American citizen who is dying of cancer and has no health care? Hm? Is that "freedom"? In Cuba, he or she would be taken care of, and healed if possible, and be given comfort, if not, and would have the freedom to enjoy friends and family, the freedom of having a place to live, the freedom of having food on the table, the freedom of knowing that, no matter what happens, society VALUES YOU and your basic needs will be met. Maybe you can never become a billionaire, but is that a LOSS of freedom, to a poor person in need of health care?

The "freedom" to become a billionaire is more a myth--propaganda by the rich and powerful--so that the rest of us will not question THEIR "freedom" to exploit us, and their inhumanity and greed.

It's time to take a hard look at this propaganda about Cuba, try to make up our own minds about the good and the bad, try to learn the facts as well as we can, and try not to have kneejerk responses. And we need to take a long hard look at our democracy and society. We desperately need to do this--because it is not working well for most Americans. We are powerless to stop unjust wars. We are powerless to stop the vast looting by the rich, and we have been totally shafted by our ruling elite in cahoots with multinational corporations that have loyalty to NO ONE. Is this "freedom"? Is this "democracy"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protocol rv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. What have you done for me lately?
Huh, sorry to say this, but my word for Chavez' communist regime is pretty simple: "What have you done for me lately?" And guess what, lately we have really high inflation, high crime, rising unemployment, a poor economy, lawlessness, and poor electricity supply. So pray tell us, why should we vote for your dear communist party members? Because they have the ability to sit in front of Chavez for 5 hours like trained seals and clap as he issues forth his prose? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. What does that mean
When you say that nobody should profit from illness? Let's say I invent some sort of new stent that decreaed recovery time from surgery. To get it to market I need to raise money and hire marketers to show it to doctors, etc. Are you saying I shouldn't be allowed to make any profit whatsoever off of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protocol rv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Forget it, naaman
It's useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. A description of Manta's former value to US strategy in Latain America:
Edited on Sun May-09-10 06:00 AM by Judi Lynn
US Military Bases in Colombia
April 22, 2010 | Pedro Campos

HAVANA TIMES, April 22 – Despite the strong opposition it now faces in the Colombian parliament, the military agreement between that country and the US continues being put into operation. This began to become evidenced this past December when the first detachments of Marines and equipment started to arrive.

Colombia holds a strategically important position in the region: It shares borders with Panama, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru and Brazil, and has access to the Atlantic Ocean via the Caribbean Sea and to the Pacific. The sentry post position provided by this enclave located in the heart of the Americas is basic in the strategic plans for the region by United States interests.

If Mexico is the “cork” to the south of the US, Colombia is its counterpart to the north of South America.

While modern satellites have demonstrated their effectiveness in locating fixed targets, those that are in movement demand more precise tracking. So far, this has only been accomplished by using closer-range detection equipment, such as that installed aboard military AWACS (aircraft equipped with radar and sensors that act more directly in theaters of military operation). Another basic function of AWACS is to cover “silent” areas that topographical features prevent from monitoring by satellite.

Information available on the types of bases being set up leaves no doubt that these involve the provision of facilities for operations aimed at more effective control at the tactical level for US military objectives in the region.

In this way, all communications and military movements, including those in bordering countries, remain under close and effective surveillance. Meanwhile the disposition of bases allows for almost absolute control over all the means of communications in Colombian territory, which is especially negative for guerrilla organizations given the implications for monitoring their movement, actions and camps.

The suspension by Ecuador of the US presence at the Manta airbase in Ecuador dealt a heavy blow to American control exercised from that site. The vast nearby territories of Peru, Argentina, Chile, Bolivia and Brazil, which were previously covered from Manta, must now be monitored from the military bases in Colombia, which will demand that AWACS fly greater distances and conduct reconnaissance from more distant points, which adds logistical and technical complication to that effort.

More:
http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=23146
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protocol rv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The gringos are OK with their new bases
I used google earth to check out all these bases. The Colombian base at Cundinamarca (Palanquero) is right in the middle of the action, and the US has access to it. If we consider they have access to a base in Honduras, one in Puerto Rico, one in Guantanamo, and as many as they need in Florida, it seems Manta is redundant now. And if the US wants a bit more radar coverage over the area, they can station a couple of ships offshore, and that should close the bag 100 %.

What Correa did was to give the yankees a good excuse to go deeper into the action, bad chess move on his part if he's playing on the FARC's side.

This havanatimes.org just doesn't have much credibility when it comes to this type of issue. The logistics and technical issues have been SIMPLIFIED for the USA.

However, as I have pointed out before, the optimum answer is to legalize drugs. That would end the crime wave and stop the FARC cold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Paramilitaries, Drug Trafficking and U.S. Policy in Colombia.
Paramilitaries, Drug Trafficking
and U.S. Policy in Colombia
by Samia Montalvo
Dollars and Sense magazine, July / August 2000


At 32 years old, Carlos Castano leads Colombia's largest paramilitary force, the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC), or United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia. The AUC has earned the nickname "The Head Cutters" because its victims are usually tortured, mutilated, and then decapitated. Waging a relentless war against Colombia's leftist guerrillas -the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the National Liberation Army (ELN)-the paramilitaries both launch attacks on guerrilla-held territory and target those they suspect of being guerrilla "sympathizers" (including labor-union leaders, peasants, peace advocates, and human-rights workers).

According to the U.S. State Department, there were 399 massacres in 1999 (up from 239 in 1998), 80% of which were carried out by the paramilitaries. The Colombian Armed Forces, meanwhile, often turn a blind eye to atrocities committed by the paramilitaries-their allies in the counterinsurgency war.

THE "DRUG WAR" AND THE GUERRILLA WAR
Colombia is already the world's third-largest recipient of U.S. military aid, having received $308 million in 1999. In January 2000, however, the Clinton administration proposed a $1.28 billion Colombia aid package, most of which is earmarked for the Armed Forces and National Police, for the next two years. The House of Representatives has since approved $1.33 billion in aid for this period. The Senate is currently considering an aid package of about $1 billion. Though the Clinton administration is selling the "Alianza Act" as a drug-war measure, the real aim of the proposed new aid is to help the Colombian government defeat the guerrillas.

This is not the first time the United States government has, in the name of "counterinsurgency," armed and trained armies with links to death squads. Remember El Salvador and Guatemala during the 1980s? Yet the U.S. has failed to learn from what it now claims were the "mistakes" of the Cold War era. Last September, U.S. Ambassador Curtis Kamman formally announced, in a Bogota press conference, that aid to the Colombian military would "bolster its fight against drugs and the guerrilla insurgency."
Guerrilla groups like the FARC are, as the U.S. government claims, involved in the drug economy. The FARC controls up to 40% of Colombia's territory, mostly in the coca-producing southern states of Putumayo and Caqueta. It taxes peasants who grow coca and in exchange protects their crops. FARC combatants fire on aircraft spraying herbicides over the coca-growing regions.
Right-wing paramilitary forces, however, also benefit from the drug trade, perhaps even more than the guerrillas.

Groups such as the AUC not only protect coca fields, but also laboratories where the coca leaf is processed into cocaine paste. On May 6, 1999, the Colombian National Police raided three cocaine laboratories under paramilitary protection in the Magdalena River Valley of northern Colombia. The three labs were capable of producing eight tons of cocaine a month. Over the following three months, Colombian officials uncovered twelve more cocaine labs under paramilitary control in the same northern region.

FROM "SELF DEFENSE" TO THE OFFENSIVE
During the 1980s, the FARC kidnapped, and in some cases killed, numerous landlords in Colombia's north-central Magdalena Medio region. One of those killed was Carlos Castano's father. After their father's death, Castano and several of his brothers signed on as guides for the Colombian army's Bombona Battalion, XIV Brigade, which armed and trained the first civilian autodefensas, or "self-defense" groups. Funded by large landowners and cattle ranchers, the autodefensas became today's paramilitaries. The Colombian Army openly armed and trained paramilitary groups until 1989, when the government banned them due to their ties with drug traffickers. Ties between the Army and the paramilitaries, however, have not been severed completely.

More:
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/South_America/Paramilitaries_Colombia.html

~~~~

Colombian Paramilitaries’ Successors Called a Threat
By SIMON ROMERO
Published: February 3, 2010

CARACAS, Venezuela — Criminal armies that emerged from the ashes of the Colombian government’s attempt to disband paramilitary groups are spreading their reach across the country’s economy while engaging in a broad range of rights abuses, including massacres, rapes and forced displacement, a human rights group said Wednesday.

A report by the group, Human Rights Watch, detailed the activities of the paramilitary successor groups, which feed off Colombia’s cocaine trade. The drug trade remains lucrative despite Washington’s channeling of more than $5 billion of security and antinarcotics aid to Colombia, making it a top recipient of United States aid outside the Middle East.

“One major reason why combating these groups is not a priority is that it’s hard for the current government to acknowledge that a significant part of its security policy is failing,” said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director for Human Rights Watch, speaking in Bogotá, Colombia.

Seeking to influence the Obama administration’s policies toward Colombia, the group recommended delaying ratification of a long-awaited trade deal until Colombia’s government vigorously and effectively confronts the criminal groups, which succeeded paramilitaries formed by landowners decades ago to combat guerrillas.

President Obama said in his State of the Union address last week that he would like to strengthen trade ties with Colombia.

The Human Rights Watch report comes at a delicate time for Colombia’s president, Álvaro Uribe, who is keeping the country on edge as to whether he will seek a third term in May. In 2006, during his administration, the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, a coalition of 37 paramilitary groups, officially demobilized, and Mr. Uribe has won support for lowering violence. But he has not secured a definitive victory against these flourishing new criminal armies, or the leftist guerrillas who have waged insurgencies that have lasted for decades. And murders connected to the paramilitaries’ successors are surging once again in Medellín, a city where there had been a respite from such violence.

More:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/world/americas/04colombia.html

~~~~

In Medellín, a Disturbing Comeback of Crime
By Nadja Drost / Medellín Thursday, Feb. 25, 2010

This is a day in the life in Medellín. One recent morning, students waved white flags calling for peace — even as they mourned a 13-year-old classmate killed by a stray bullet just days before. In the afternoon, police captured 21 alleged criminal gang members who had slipped back into the paramilitary drug world after pledging to give it up. By night, around 10:30 p.m., police were hauling a dead body into their "necro-mobile" — a truck that collects bodies — and remarking how light a night it had been so far. It was only the second murder of the night.

Medellín has always had trouble living down its reputation. In the 1980s and '90s it was one of the most dangerous cities in the world — first as the headquarters of Pablo Escobar's cocaine cartel and then as the playground of right-wing paramilitary groups. But Medellín's murder rate dropped steadily after paramilitary fighters started putting down their arms in 2003 as part of a peace agreement with the government — and the city, one of the most dynamic industrial centers of Colombia, slowly re-established itself as a metropolis to reckon with.
(See pictures from the life of the drug lord Pablo Escobar and his son.)

But last year was not a good one for Medellín. Murders doubled in 2009, to 2,899, according to the National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Science. It was the largest number of homicides since 2002, when there were some 5,000 murders (there were an estimated 6,500 in 1991). The situation is directly attributable to a drug war that has once again engulfed the hillsides ringing the city. Reports in the Colombian press had the number of murders at 230 in January of this year. Behind the surge of violence is a battle over power and territory between warring factions of a cartel-like network of criminal bands called the Office of Envigado that controls the vast majority of drug trafficking in Medellín.

More:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1967232,00.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC