Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colombian ambassador walks out on OAS meeting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 04:05 PM
Original message
Colombian ambassador walks out on OAS meeting
Colombian ambassador walks out on OAS meeting
Friday, 19 March 2010 10:47 Brett Borkan

Colombia's ambassador to the Organization of American States (OAS), Luis Alfonso Hoyos, walked out of an International Commission on Human Rights meeting on Thursday, after Ecuador requested that the Commission pass a resolution condemning Colombia for its 2008 attack on a FARC camp on Ecuadorean soil.

Hoyos walked out of the meeting after delivering a 20 minute speech to delegates, arguing that the Commission has no jurisdiction to declare breaches of international humanitarian law, reported news site ABC.es.

Hoyos assured the OAS delegates that his country "has no problems with their brother, Ecuador, but with a group of assassins, narco-traffickers, terrorists and kidnappers called the FARC," and claimed that the FARC camp that Colombia attacked in Ecuador was a legitimate military target under international humanitarian law.

Hoyos' speech followed a request from Ecuador's Prosecutor General, Diego Garcia, for the OAS Commission to take the "historic" decision and condemn Colombia for its actions.

More:
http://colombiareports.com/colombia-news/news/8778-colombian-ambassador-walks-out-on-oas-meeting.html

http://news.thomasnet.com.nyud.net:8090/IMT/archives/ministry-of-silly-walks.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. The FARC camp was NOT a "legitimate military target." That's why the attacked was condemned
by the entire Rio Group--every Latin American country--soon after it occurred. It was NOT a "hot pursuit" situation, as discovered by the Ecuadoran military when they inspected the site. The found bodies in their pajamas shot in the back. The camp was asleep when Colombia and the U.S. dropped a load of U.S. "smart bombs" on the site and then raided over the border to shoot any survivors. Further, it was well-known that this was a hostage release camp. Three European envoys--from Switzerland, France and Spain--were in Ecuador, on their way to the camp for the release of high profile hostage Ingrid Betancourt and others, when they were warned off (by someone in Colombia). Her family had been notified. And several Mexican students, who were killed by the bombs, were at the camp for the humanitarian event. Raul Reyes, the FARC commander, had set up this camp, just inside Ecuador's border, to release Betancourt and others in a bid for peace in Colombia's 40+ year civil war. The reason he chose this border area was probably because, when Uribe had asked Hugo Chavez to negotiate with the FARC for hostage releases, in Dec 07/Feb 08, and Chavez succeeded, the Colombian military bombed the hostages as they were on route to their freedom. (Those hostages held a press conference about it, which was not covered by our corpo-fascist media.) The Venezuelan/Colombia border was too "hot" and the fascists in Colombia, and in the White House, too hostile to Chavez.

This is why the attack was unanimously condemned in Latin America and why Uribe was compelled to apologize for it and to promise that Colombia would never do it again. But now that the CIA has dumped Uribe, and will install former Defense Minister Manuel Santos (the 'Donald Rumsfeld' of Latin America) as 'president' of Colombia, and the U.S. military will be occupying the country, the issue becomes even more critically important. Ecuador is right to bring it up again, to reinforce this policy and bolster Ecuador's and other countries' sovereignty as much as possible. It is just such a situation as this that could be used to start Oil War II in South America (a 'Gulf of Tonkin'-type incident), and it is quite likely that this bombing/raid on Ecuador was a rehearsal of that sort of strategy. Ecuador and Venezuela both became alarmed by the attack and rushed military battalions to their borders, not knowing what might happen next. Lula da Silva has credited Chavez for calming things down and preventing a U.S.-instigated war, then and there. (He called Chavez "the great peacemaker"). As to U.S. involvement, the Ecuadoran military reported that Colombia did not have the capability of delivering U.S. "smart bombs," and it was likely a U.S. plane, pilot and bombs that attacked Ecuador. They probably originated at the U.S. military base at Manta, Ecuador, which Rafael Correa, president of Ecuador had determined to shut down. (He did so last year.)

The Bushwhacks/Pentagon were likely trying to accomplish several things by this bombing/raid--punishing Correa for kicking the U.S. military out of Ecuador, testing U.S./Colombia coordination systems, rehearsing methods of starting a war, concocting their bullshit story about the FARC laptop (later laptopS)--the "miracle laptops"--that they allegedly recovered from the bombing site, containing 'evidence' that Chavez and Correa are "terrorist lovers" (helping the FARC to get a "dirty bomb," and other psyops allegations) and--most important of all--ENDING all talk of peace in Colombia's civil war. Colombia's civil war is essential to U.S. militarization of the region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. They should do it again.
Attack all the FARC havens. Kill them in their jammies, it's not like FARC only attacks people facing them in uniform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. How about condemning Ecuador for allowing FARC a haven?
And how about condemning Venezuela for allowing the same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I would guess the Colombian ambassador didn't want to be laughed out of the chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That would have done it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. the FARC were there weren't they, and Reyes is dead. so it wasn't so bad afterall n.t
s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. + 1,000,000,000
although the Colombian ambassador should have said what you did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Correa tells uribito, give me the hard drives


from Reyes' bomb-resistant laptops and then we will re-establish full diplomatic relations. :rofl:

----------------------------------
Correa fue más tajante ayer. “Lo que ocurrió no fue un juego. Ha sido el bombardeo más grave en la historia de América Latina y, de acuerdo con ciertos informes de Inteligencia, no los pueden hacer los aviones colombianos. Por eso, siempre hubo los rumores de la intervención de un tercer país, entonces eso es lo que queremos aclarar”.

Correa was more curt yesterday. "What happened was not a game. It has been the gravest bombing in the history of Latin America and, according to certain intelligence reports, Colombian planes cannot (launch such attacks). Because of that, there were always rumors of a third-party's intervention; so that is what we want to clear up."

----------------

The third party's intervention would have been from .... uh, Manta?

El Comercio of Quito, Ecuador

http://www.elcomercio.com/noticiaEC.asp?id_noticia=341294&id_seccion=3


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC