Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Miami Hairball) U.S. broadcasts to Cuba get stronger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 08:00 PM
Original message
(Miami Hairball) U.S. broadcasts to Cuba get stronger
Edited on Wed Feb-10-10 08:01 PM by Billy Burnett
Can you believe this crap?

Not only is it a violation of international treaty ("it" being directing broadcasts to another nation without agreement over frequencies, which this US funded broadcast is), but now the Obama admin is stepping up the illegal US activities. The US is clearly a rogue nation in this (ongoing) action.

U.S. broadcasts to Cuba get stronger
http://www.miamiherald.com/581/story/1472809.html

BY LAURA WIDES-MUNOZ
AP HISPANIC AFFAIRS WRITER
MIAMI -- The U.S. government's official broadcasts to Cuba and the government-funded Voice of America are for the first time regularly sharing resources - a move officials hope will enhance both services and which could blunt longtime criticism of the Cuban broadcasts.

Some also question whether the move signals the beginning of the end for the controversial U.S. Office of Cuban Broadcasting.

Last week, the office's TV and Radio Marti services opened their studios to VOA's Spanish division to jointly produce a regular half-hour radio show. "A Fondo" or "In Depth" provides news and analysis from around the hemisphere. It was developed in part to target Venezuela, where President Hugo Chavez has cracked down on opposition and independent media and frequently criticizes U.S. foreign policy.

"I am looking into this issue to ensure that this is an effort to maximize resources to expand U.S. coverage in the region and not a back door to reducing U.S. broadcasts to Cuba," U.S Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Miami, told The Associated Press.

"If this reduces the capability of Radio and TV Marti, it would be another concession to the Cuban regime who fears the uncensored information these broadcasts offer," added the legislator, a Cuban-American and champion of the decades-old U.S. embargo of Cuba.

Miami-based Radio and TV Marti, the government's only foreign broadcasts based outside of Washington, have for years endured charges that the virulent, anti-communist tone of some of their programs was ineffective. Critics - particularly those who oppose Washington's Cuba policies - also question whether anyone on the island even watches the more expensive TV Marti. The Cuban government generally blocks it.

The association between the VOA and the Martis could help the latter's reputation, said Nicholas Cull, a University of Southern California professor who has studied the government's foreign broadcasts.

"My feeling is that Marti has had a checkered history, and that anything that can pull its output into line with the high journalistic standards of VOA would be for the good," he said.

U.S. Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., one of the Martis' most ardent critics, had a more cynical take.

"I think they realize they're on borrowed time with the Cuba project, so I think they're trying to merge it in as much as they can with Voice of America," he said.

Alberto Mascaro, a Miami native and former Office of Cuban Broadcasting executive, recently took the helm of VOA's Spanish-language service in Washington. He says the cooperation is not about politics but about the best use of resources.

"Miami being a gateway city, it's a place where we can glean information and guests that in Washington just may not be as accessible. It's a whole additional talent pool," said Mascaro, who hopes to serve as a bridge between the two broadcasts.

VOA has news stringers south of the U.S. border but no longer has any bureaus there - making the Miami studios all the more important as Washington seeks to counter increasing criticism from Chavez, Bolivian President Evo Morales and Nicaragua's Daniel Ortega.

Over the last year, the Marti studios have occasionally produced other shows for VOA and served as a training hub for its journalists from across the region. In recent weeks, VOA has also relied on Marti's Miami studios for much of its broadcasting to Haiti, using local Creole-speaking reporters from the area's large Haitian-American community.

Still, the change comes as the Office of Cuban Broadcasting faces budget cuts. Last year it was forced to lay off more than 20 staffers. While the larger VOA's 2011 budget request of $206.8 million is up slightly over previous years, Cuban broadcasting's request of $29.2 million is down about $4 million from 2007.

Mascaro insists both organizations adhere to the same standards and serve important but distinct missions. Marti provides a counterbalance to Cuba's tightly controlled, pro-government media.

"It's not trying to provide a pro-Castro perspective. They already get that - and only that," he said. VOA's job is to offer a broader spectrum of balanced news about the U.S. and the world, with politically and culturally relevant information for each region.

The two services differ on the technical side as well. Because the Cuba broadcasts are not welcome by the country's government, the U.S. must beam them directly into the island via shortwave, AM broadcasts and satellite. While VOA's broadcasts also use shortwave and satellite, and now with "Al Fondo," some AM, they rely more heavily on local affiliates.

Yet that may change, too. VOA's Spanish-language radio is carried by only a handful of affiliates in Venezuela, and its TV service by even fewer. Given Chavez's recent decision to take the opposition cable and satellite Radio Caracas Television International off the air, it could soon lose even those platforms. And that would make it all the more dependent on the same modes of transmission the Martis rely on.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. So they take down the LED sign from the US Interests Section, but do this
The policy is so confused, truly an embarrassment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wasted time, effort, and money. There is no way to put a good
Edited on Thu Feb-11-10 03:46 AM by Downwinder
face on US actions in Honduras and Haiti. Like putting lipstick on Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. More Powerful Broadcasts? Oh, the Pain! The Pain!
So the US has upped the power on what it broadcasts to Cuba?

Gee, isn't that a gosh-darn shame?

I really don't see why DU's leading Castro apologists are so upset about it. Unless President Obama has pried Radio Mambi's fingers off of Radio Marti, few island Cubans are going to willingly listen to Radio Marti broadcasts anyway. And, unless export consumer radio receiver designs have changed in the last couple of months, Cuban listeners have the same choice I have or most other DU'ers have--move past the Radio Marti frequencies or turn their radios off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Never mind that it is in violation of international treaty.
Maybe Cuba should retaliate by doing some "Freedom Broadcasting" to the US.

Probably wouldn't be popular here to hear about Cuba's system - all of that forced universal health care and universal education 'n all.
No one here admires nor desires any such things. :sarcasm:

But, Cuba, again, takes the high road by adhering to treaties and won't waste resources on such a rogue action.













Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Actually, Cuban Government Broadcasts to the US Would Be a Good Idea
Actually, Cuban broadcasts to the US would be a good idea. I'm one of those people who feels restricted by format radio that either broadcasts (the worst of the) Top 40, all sports, or the excrement coming from right-wing talk radio. If your hypothetical Cuban radio station started broadcasting to south and central Florida, it might well be one of the best things to happen to those areas' radio listeners in a long, long time.

And grumpy "Amurricans" who decide that they don't like the Cuban government's commentaries can do the same thing that Havana regime loyalists could do with a higher-wattage Radio Mambi suborned to the Voice of America could do--change the channel or turn the radio off.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protocol rv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Maybe what you need is less extremism?
I agree you need less extremism. I visited the US recently, and the right wing radio stations are downright nazi in character. And they are big fat liars. However, Cuban broadcasts would likely be extreme on the left side of the spectrum. What's needed is professional, balanced, truthful coverage, and this is hard to find in today's world. It seems most media lies.

One item I noticed in the US media was the way they lie about Iran's uranium enrichment program. I don't support the Iranian government (I'm atheist, and I don't like theocracy of any form), but the commentary in US media distorts the facts, or gets into outright lies. In Iran's case, this may be caused by Israel Lobby influence within the USA, which we know is very powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. What a shame Colorado's Dem. Rep. David Skaggs tried to get TV Marti removed, like a tumor,
from the back of the US taxpayer, only to be threatened, then ruined politically by Florida's Cuban "exile" piece of #### Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart, who set to work to destroy, as he warned, every project for Colorado Skaggs held dear, then got financial backing from the CANF to spread the news in Colorado newspaper ads across the the state, destroying his next election instantly.

Rep. Skaggs realized it was a treacherous pork black hole, designed to fatten the purses of the Cuban "exile" leaders in Miami, who control, staff, program ALL the crap it spews daily. It is their personal toy. It vomits their point of view back to the very people who threw them out in the first place. How dirty can they get? The sky's the limit.

As Rep. Skaggs knew it was a filthy unneeded expense forced upon the American taxpayers, he took the time to explain to Congress that ordinary Cuban citizens can use antennas and pick up ordinary commercial tv programming from the US just FINE, and they do. What purpose on earth can "exile" programming serve for Cubans? They ALREADY get programming from the US, as well as other places in the Caribbean, and the rest of Latin America.

I recall learning from Canadian DU'er Freecancat that you can take a Walkman, and pick up US radio stations walking down the street in Havana.

But hell, no, why not back up a dumptruck annually to the Radio/TV Marti offices and pour well over $30,000,000.00 of US American taxpayers' hard-earned money into the funnel leading directly to "exile" leaders and to "exile" politicians!

Hey, hyuk, hyuk, what's so wrong with that? Are we useful idiots, dictator humpers, or whaaaaat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. We're at war with Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Haiti...?????
What justification can there be for broadcasting U.S. propaganda into entirely peaceful countries with whom we are not at war?

I can see countering "Tokyo Rose" as an understandable requirement of war--a war that the Japanese started. When did Cuba attack the U.S.? When did Venezuela? When did Bolivia? When did Nicaragua? When did poor Haiti? When did any of these countries attack anyone, other than their own heinous rightwing dictatorships?

This is a complete waste of our money, and it is WRONG!

------

"VOA has news stringers south of the U.S. border but no longer has any bureaus there - making the Miami studios all the more important as Washington seeks to counter increasing criticism from Chavez, Bolivian President Evo Morales and Nicaragua's Daniel Ortega."

-----

:wtf:

-----

Why don't they "counter" the "increasing criticism" by LISTENING to it, and SUPPORTING social justice, and respecting the sovereignty of other countries, and hailing their democratic achievements, and cheering on their reductions in poverty, their empowerment of the people, their education and health care expansion programs?

Why don't they LISTEN to the criticisms of U.S. militarism in Colombia and throughout the region? LISTEN to the criticisms of the failed, corrupt, murderous "war on drugs"? LISTEN to the criticisms of the World Bank/IMF loan sharks, and U.S. dominated "free trade for the rich"?

It is DISGUSTING that the U.S. government wants to "counter" these voices, wants to overthrow them, wants to return to the era of heinous rightwing dictatorships, in the interests of the rich and the corporate.

-----

I am not oblivious to the nuancse here...

"'If this reduces the capability of Radio and TV Marti, it would be another concession to the Cuban regime who fears the uncensored information these broadcasts offer,' added the (nutball rightwing) legislator, a Cuban-American and champion of the decades-old U.S. embargo of Cuba."

This COULD be a subtle move away from the shrill, absurd, nutball McCarthyite, Cuban 'exile' insanity and toward Obama/Clinton's 'new and improved' U.S. domination (--heinous rightwing dictatorships with the facade of martial law 'elections'--a la Honduras). You gotto figure that anything Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Puke-Miami) is against, or is suspicious of, might have some positive points. However, I think it's just the old DLC-Puke shuffle, whereby, say, first term senator Jim DeMint (Puke-SC) holds the Obama government hostage on Honduras, and then the Obama government caves to the extremist rightwing. Illusions. Is clever rightwing/corporate propaganda any better than naked, ineffective rightwing/corporate propaganda? Could even be worse.

And it is WRONG!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not only wrong, for the reasons you mention, but in violation of a ratified treaty.
Edited on Thu Feb-11-10 11:41 AM by Mika

Both the US and Cuba are signatories of the broadcast treaty.

As Billy points out, it is the USA acting in rogue fashion.












Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "Treaties? We don't need no stinkin' treaties!" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Treaties are just pieces of paper, like constitutions. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC