Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Analysis: Honduras coup shows Chavez power limited

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 05:00 PM
Original message
Analysis: Honduras coup shows Chavez power limited
Analysis: Honduras coup shows Chavez power limited

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090728/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_honduras_chavez_s_challenge_analysis


David W. Koop, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 43 mins ago
MEXICO CITY – The coup in Honduras has shown the limits to Hugo Chavez's power in the region, as Latin America looks to Washington to resolve the ordeal.

The Venezuelan president put his military on alert and declared that Honduras' interim government "must be overthrown." But a month after the coup, he has not only failed to reinstate his friend Manuel Zelaya — he has solidified the deposed president's opposition.

As the officials who ordered Zelaya out of the country a month ago at gunpoint refused to budge, even Chavez found himself saying: "Do something. Obama, do something!"

Chavez gave the deposed Zelaya use of a Venezuelan airplane — which the Honduran military prevented from landing — his foreign minister as a travel companion and his state-run television cameras for media exposure.

But when Zelaya needed help getting reinstated, he went to Washington, not Caracas.

The U.S., which condemned the coup, enlisted Nobel Peace Prize laureate Oscar Arias, now Costa Rica's president, to broker a solution. Those talks fell apart when the interim Honduran government of Roberto Micheletti refused to reinstate Zelaya.

Zelaya is now camped at the border of Nicaragua and Honduras to keep international pressure on Micheletti's government, something U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called "reckless."

Zelaya accused Clinton of backing off from her support and urges Washington daily to take tougher measures against the coup leaders. The U.S. State Department revoked the diplomatic visas of four of them Tuesday and said it's reviewing the visas of all interim government officials.

Meanwhile, Chavez has limited his action to calling for Hondurans to rise up to reinstate Zelaya, even as pro-Zelaya protests have been small. Instead, the Venezuelan president has been a talkative bystander, calling coup leaders "gorillas" and referring to Micheletti as "Goriletti."

This is not the role Chavez imagined for himself. In a decade in office, he has used his nation's oil wealth and his vision of a united continent free of "U.S. imperialism" to cultivate a leadership role beyond Venezuela's borders.

Chavez has provided a regional model for extending presidential rule and governing by plebiscite to thwart the political and business elite that long ruled — and still owns — much of Latin America.

In fact, it was Zelaya's attempt to hold such a vote — ignoring a Supreme Court order to cancel it — that the opposition cited in arresting him and throwing him out of the country. Opponents accuse Zelaya of wanting to use a constitutional referendum to extend his rule the way Chavez has, something Zelaya denies.

Zelaya, a wealthy rancher elected in 2005 from the Honduran business establishment, may have pledged allegiance to Chavez for reasons as much financial as they are ideological.

Chavez's Petrocaribe program gave Honduras oil, asking for long-term payment at a very low interest rate. Chavez's nine-nation ALBA, which Zelaya joined last year, gave Honduras $300 million in aid — which the opposition complains Zelaya never accounted for.

Falling oil prices have diminished Chavez's international reach, and in any case the aid provided by Venezuela pales in comparison to the cash flowing from the north.

Trade between Honduras, the hemisphere's fourth-poorest country, and the United States tops $7 billion a year. Hondurans living in the United States sent home an estimated $2.5 billion a year on top of that before the current economic crisis. Together, that money accounts for more than a fifth of the Honduran economy.

Latin America's left has wanted Washington to step back from the region, after a history marked more by backing coups than resolving them. Obama won praise for saying the United States will be an equal partner in Latin America.

But Washington's economic might — not Chavez's largesse — is Zelaya's best hope for returning to the presidency.

The Obama administration has suspended more than $18 million in military and development assistance. If it went further and cut off trade or remittances, it would devastate the Honduran economy.

"The U.S. could make this be over in a second if it imposed strong sanctions," said Rice University political scientist Mark Jones.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I do believe you are the one arguing about Chavez's power,
I have not seen him proclaiming it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Article is nothing but a rehash of rightwing talking points and...
it reeks of American Exceptionalism.

The coup would have been over in hours had the US frozen the bank accounts of the coup plotters. Unfortunately for Honduras, the US is pursuing the same imperialist policies that Ronald Reagan, and to a lesser extent Bill Clinton, pursued in Latin America: secure natural resources for American corporations, keep a cheap labour pool for the machiladoras.

Growth in world markets has shifted to manufactured goods, services, and informational technologies. The opening of capital markets in developing countries has merely resulted in takeovers by international firms, draining the raw materials from these nations (reminiscent of the worse days of mercantilism and colonialism). Meanwhile the wealthy nations continue to insure that barriers exist against immigration and agriculture, so that "real" economic growth which results in a higher standard of living for the people has become more and more remote. Note that I use the term "real" economic growth to distinguish it from published figures by common economic indicators published by the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, The World Trade Organization, and others. These indicators, using transfer figures, statistics from machiladoras, and "exports" (which amount to onemultinational in a poor country processing a segment of a product and then exporting it to wealthy country for final completion), is hardly indicative of the true economic picture of a nation or of what free trade is meant to be.

Global Village or Gated Community?

Michael Hogan

http://sincronia.cucsh.udg.mx/hogani02.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC