Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Peanut Butter-gate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
133724 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 04:02 PM
Original message
Peanut Butter-gate
Food-stamp diet

One of Rep. Tim Ryan’s (D-Ohio) final hurdles in the Food Stamp Challenge has been dubbed “Peanut Butter-gate” by his office.

Last Friday, when the Buckeye State lawmaker was running late to the Manchester, N.H., airport after giving a commencement speech at his former law school, he forgot to remove his jars of peanut butter and jelly from his luggage.

Transportation and Safety Administration officials quickly confiscated the goods and let him pass. Only problem was that those provisions were almost all of Ryan’s food for the next few days.

By the end of Monday, Ryan and Reps. James McGovern (D-Mass.), Jo Ann Emerson (R-Mo.) and Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) had completed a week of eating only $21 worth of food each — the average amount of benefits a food-stamp beneficiary uses.

Their mission was part of the Food Stamp Challenge.


http://thehill.com/cover-stories/food-stamp-diet-2007-05-23.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. One more GATE for the endless list. Another 100 here. Please add those missed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. TSA workers
must have been hungry or something.
Confiscating peanut butter and jelly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If they're spreadable, they're considered liquids
You even have to have your Chapstick in your little baggie of liquids and that's less liquidy than PB or J.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Why are we still being penalized for a publicity stunt?
Carrying liquid explosives has never been proven viable. NEVER. Can we stop being jackasses about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. for the same reason TSA runs shoes through metal detectors
even though the agency itself admitted that there was no way that would detect explosives, which is what they're supposedly worried about.

It's simple logic:

Something must be done.
This is something.
Therefore, we must do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Especially the amount of liquids most people would carry on them
a 12-oz bottle? Come on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. what terrorist can use pb&j as a weapon?
I'm snacking on some primo Jiff right now myself. Ummm pnut butter and water for a late afternoon snack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Dennis the Menace
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC