i need to run this thru again... White House Release of martial law plans after nuking IRAN..LINK>>

[sam sarrha]

the world will be thrown into a world wide Holly war cataclysm if not total world war.. economies will not survive.. are you ready??..got food, got gas, got your elected officials phone numbers...


White House Release.. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html

it if glaring obvious what this is about..

this is Poppy's New World Order, they believe the 'Utopia' will rise out of the ashes.. when they do this it will be toooo late, everything will be shut down.. no internet

you can contact all your elected representatives thur a program Randi Rhodes has available at
http://www.therandirhodesshow.com

[tridim]

1. If Bush nuked Iran the entire US would be glass within days, maybe hours.

BushCo doesn't understand M.A.D. at all.

[The Magistrate]

5. Who On Earth Would Do that, Sir?

Any power that launched such a strike would be devastated itself, within half an hour of launching the missiles. Do you seriously imagine the Russians would do that over Persians?

[sam sarrha]

7. they are planning on using a nuclear tipped bunker buster.. it is a small weapon but it will be

used for propaganda purposes.. even if they dont use the Mike's a preemptive strike on Iran will be disastrous.. the Muslim nations will cut our oil off..

[CJCRANE]

13. I have a feeling

most of the arab monarchies will be happy to see Iran knocked down. How the "arab street" reacts is a different story.

[OzarkDem]

15. Then they should do it themselves

The failure of the US and other allied nations to hold ME leaders accountable for dealing with their regional problems means endless wars with no solution.

[sam sarrha]

24. i dont think they will want to crawl in bed with us...

[The Magistrate]

16. A Possible Oil Embargo, Sir

Is a long way from the country being glazed, as the person above suggested would be the certain consequence....

[sam sarrha]

25. it is a bunker buster nuke tiped weapon, under ground..not an air burst, it will still piss them off

[chimpymustgo]

2. K and R. nt

nt

[PDJane]

3. Since I am a suspicious individual,

I suspect that the plan is to nuke at least one American city first.....or perhaps just a bio attack or something will be sufficient......in order to provide the excuse for nuking Iran. By then, yes, the apocalypse will come. The once-stated aim of PNAC was to reduce the world's population by two-thirds. An apocalypse will do it, but there will be nothing left of the world to inherit by that point.

[sam sarrha]

8. i was reffering to the bunker busters called a Mikie.. not an air burst

[rucky]

4. Or it could kick in by the next hurricaine.

That scares me worse. The person who has the authority to declare an emergency also gains the power from doing so. Could be anything. Pickles has an ingrown toenail! Declare a state of emergency!

[sam sarrha]

6. they have proven again and again, they dont give a Sh*t about domestic problems

they only care about domination by any means, stealing elections, rigging the justice dept, going to war on deliberately faked information.. they are not going to stop till they have a dickTattor ship

[sam sarrha]

9. they pulled Fema off Katrina for 4 days for an F'n Seminar on disaster relief.. they are not going

to do anything good for anyone but the corporations that pay up and rich...

[rucky]

18. Now he's got command of the National Guard...

http://www.towardfreedom.com/home/content/view/911/

[sam sarrha]

29. so what would you think if they had released both of these at the same time.??

[snappyturtle]

37. Thanks, this is a good summary of last fall's "events"! nt

[MGKrebs]

10. France, Germany, Russia, and maybe China will need to step up to the plate

and help resist further adventures by the neocons. We plebians can't do this by ourselves apparently. Economic sanctions, boycotts, frozen assets, embargoes... Bush has to be made to feel consequences, and he can't fight the whole industrialized world (I hope).

[OzarkDem]

14. Where is the UN, NATO these days?

Have we completely dismissed these organizations? Have they been rendered completely useless?

[MGKrebs]

17. I don't know about NATO, but the UN has never really been about

confronting force with force. There are things they do to help prevent conflict but that isn't working with Bush.

[snappyturtle]

11. I learned of this a few days ago here on DU and I think it's good

to keep it out there so everyone has a chance to learn about it. This morning a caller on Washington Journal asked the two reporter guests about this presidential directive and NEITHER of them had heard about it, so they claimed! Later, Peter got some info and put it out there! I was surprised and happy he did that. K&R

[CJCRANE]

12. Does the new "War Czar" fit into this?

Is he there to over-ride the Sec Def? (Since Gates doesn't seem to keep to the script).

[NoPasaran]

19. Holly war?

:wtf:

[sam sarrha]

28. i have lived in an Islamic Republic.. the enemy of my enemy is my friend, even if they are an enemy

[NoPasaran]

31. But who is at war with Holly?

Is someone shooting mistletoe?

[sam sarrha]

33. bite me Spelling Nazi...

[L. Coyote]

20. TIN-HATTED paranoia will not solve our dilemna, and making Congress think

the public is a bunch of nut heads does not help at all.

Glass-ball politics, fortune reading the future, is not exactly a great strategy to deal with the present.

I thought that paranoid politics and divining cataclysm was the realm of pinko-fearing Birchers? Better to keep it real on the left, right?

[sam sarrha]

22. so you dont think attacking Iran is a Problem.. i did not make it clear that they intended to use

bunker buster nuke tipped devices.. but that wont make any difference to Muslim Propagandists.. or me for that matter, it is insanity to have our navy in 280 feet of water within range of Mach 3 anti-ship-missles that give 20 second warnings, and rocket mines under the water.

we could lose 2 carrier groups in an hour, and David Pearl will have his 'Pearl harbor' to cinch the NeoCon take over of the governmnt

[sam sarrha]

27. just unglossing th best case scenario from the daze of complacency our navy is in 280 feet of water

our president is insane.. our VP is a Megalomaniac and then we get the notice they have plans to take over totally in case of the Emergency they are perpetrating..

[MzShellG]

32. Some folks are simply in denial.....

Mostly out of fear to believe the possiblity or just plain voluntary ignorance.

[RC]

21. Where is Congress in all of this?

No where is it mentioned.

[sam sarrha]

23. last month they declined to pass a bill denying him the ability to attack Iran

[HCE SuiGeneris]

26. Having all of those naval ships grouped together

in the bathtub of the Persian Gulf is beyond reckless. It is a catastrophic strategic error in military judgment.

[magellan]

35. As intended

"Mistakes were made...."

[54anickel]

30. Revokes Clinton's PDD 67 AND "all Annexes thereto" - at least according to

this link....

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=National_Continuity_Policy

snip>

Revocation of PDD-67
The directive revokes Presidential Decision Directive 67 of October 21, 1998 (Enduring Constitutional Government and Continuity of Government Operations), "including all Annexes thereto".

According to the Federation of American Scientists, the "text of PDD-67 has not been released, and there is no White House Factsheet summarizing its provisions." <1> A summary can be found here and here.


And you've got to sort of wonder what's all included in Bush's Annex A

From you're link:

(23) Annex A and the classified Continuity Annexes, attached hereto, are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this directive.

(24) Security. This directive and the information contained herein shall be protected from unauthorized disclosure, provided that, except for Annex A, the Annexes attached to this directive are classified and shall be accorded appropriate handling, consistent with applicable Executive Orders.


I was able to find the FPC 65 from July 1999 - http://www.usaid.gov/policy/ads/100/fpc65899.pdf
Don't have the time to dig much more right now, so not sure what it all means - just have a hard time trusting anything the little Whistle-ass does. :shrug:

[blues90]

34. I have read this new bush power grab

I have no doubt that somehow and soon we will be attacking Iran either by some manufactured lie or by the buildup of ships in the gulf or by another attack on our soil curtesy of bushco/cheney con .

[MGKrebs]

36. The rationalizaion already exists...

we can't let the "capture" of those British sailors go unanswered.

[mediawatch]

38. and when will this happen

after the march 2005 draft? Sorry to be sarcastic, but that would be a barbaric thing to do.