|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:05 PM Original message |
Lawrence O'Donnell Bugs Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. He's actually a very smart person... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. So you disagree with what I said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. So how did Clinton pass a tax increase with far less democrats in congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:16 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. By compromising |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:18 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Can you be more specific please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:18 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Actually.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. So the filibuster didn't exist during the Clinton administration? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:25 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. It did.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. ahh, so you are saying that things were far more civil during the Clinton administration than now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:35 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. The stain on the dress was during Clinton's 2nd term... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:37 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. So why did they not filibuster then but they do now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:41 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. As I said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:45 PM Response to Reply #55 |
62. The only problem with your theory is that they did filibuster under Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:47 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. YOU MISSED MY POINT.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:50 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. No, I got your point perfectly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:55 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. The tax increases were... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:56 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. So you are saying Gingrich is everything that is wrong with our country today? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:49 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. By the way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:57 PM Response to Reply #67 |
78. Here's a chart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:59 PM Response to Reply #41 |
83. At no point in history has the filibuster threat been used like this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:01 AM Response to Reply #83 |
85. WHY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:19 AM Response to Reply #85 |
94. I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:57 AM Response to Reply #94 |
96. lol, best response of the night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 07:17 AM Response to Reply #96 |
98. He does seem to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:30 AM Response to Reply #98 |
99. So you are under the impression that the past never matters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #99 |
109. No But times and conditions change over time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #41 |
113. Yes they were - in 1993 - long before Monica arrived on the scene |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:19 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Actually.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:41 PM Response to Reply #21 |
57. Because back in those days the GOP was not abusing the cloture rule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:44 PM Original message |
Why didn't they abuse it then? They were willing to impeach... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
75. That was in Clinton's second term, not in his first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
66. O'Donnell said Clinton could have done it with 53 votes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:54 PM Response to Reply #66 |
72. When did the filibuster rules change? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:58 PM Response to Reply #72 |
80. I'm only reporting *exactly* what he said, in fact... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:00 AM Response to Reply #80 |
84. I say he was full of shit. If anyone wants to clarify that fine by me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:04 AM Response to Reply #84 |
88. I'll wait for clarification, too, but in the meantime... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:11 AM Response to Reply #88 |
90. His point was using weasel words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #21 |
115. He did it by reconcilliation, remember how Al Gore had to cast the tie breaking vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. That he is... HOWEVER, he was demonstrably wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. ummmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:22 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. Some want to point to LO as justification that THEY are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. But he sure makes sense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. But he sure makes sense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:35 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. He's a smart guy... He will undoubtedly offer good insights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:43 PM Response to Reply #49 |
59. From what I read the guy still hangs out at the senate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:44 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. I fell asleep during RM... will have to watch later... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:44 PM Response to Reply #49 |
61. From what I read the guy still hangs out at the senate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:59 PM Response to Reply #61 |
82. I don't agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
53. I thought so too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. You know he was a Congressional aide in 1994, don't you? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I do, in what way does that dispute what I just said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. It doesn't. I was just pointing it out just in case you hadn't heard him brag about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPNotForMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. OMG I just bitched about that below. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
25. More than that, he was Chief of Staff to Senate Finance committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
3. O'Donnell is just an angry, incoherent socialist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Your statement makes no sense at all.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
37. Bernie is a socialist, but Lawrence is also very pragmatic, not idealistic nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
6. They were not able to pass a middle-class-only tax cut (which would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. He kept insisting it was not possible to pass tax increases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. The Senate held a vote to essentially increase the wealthy's taxes (by letting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. You didn't answer my question. I would appreciate if you did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. Different times, different circumstances, different Democrats, different Republicans, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:31 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Wow, how much things change in just 15 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:33 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Things have changed a lot in 15 years. And they're searching for a way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Yet they didn't filibuster back then. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:37 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. That's my issue, I don't know also. But it makes no fucking sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPNotForMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
8. He annoys me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
9. DLC MSNBC plant. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:45 AM Response to Reply #9 |
105. Like Chris Matthews. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tpsbmam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
11. I have to disagree. I liked hearing his perspective and thought his show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. I dont mind hearing his perspective but it bugs the shit out of me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
14. he criticized Landrieu who isn't progressive , liberal etc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Thank you for bringing this up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. i saw one earlier , someone brought her up as a way to bash Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:16 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. You think "even Landrieu opposes..." is an endorsement of Landrieu? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Right. Why not run a Sanders clip? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:26 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. I'm not sure I understood your reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
30. He never said it was impossible to let taxes increase in general. He specifically said that it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. How many republicans voted for the Clinton tax increase? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:31 PM Response to Reply #33 |
45. Not a single one. They had reconciliation instructions in the budget, so they could use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:41 PM Response to Reply #45 |
56. So you are saying we can't get 50 democrats out of 60 to agree to a tax cut for the middle class? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:46 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. No. I am saying 60 is the threshold, because we cannot use reconciliation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:48 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. So Clinton got his tax increases passed using only a majority because of the budget resolution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:57 PM Response to Reply #65 |
79. Correct, because no budget was passed, because progressives and blue dogs couldn't agree on a budget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:05 AM Response to Reply #79 |
89. So the democrats don't have 50 members in the senate that said they were for middle class tax cuts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:14 AM Response to Reply #89 |
92. How many times can I say it. We do have 50. 50 ISN'T ENOUGH. We need 60. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:31 AM Response to Reply #92 |
100. Again, Obama had the same tools available to him that Clinton did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:32 AM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Not when House progressives and House bluedogs couldn't agree on a budget. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:45 AM Response to Reply #101 |
104. And Clinton had nothing to do with the fact he got his caucus (which was much smaller than Obama's) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
32. I think Lawrence O has quite a brilliant mind and a clear way to see the political maneuverings.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:22 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. He looked very smart tonight after the diatribes by KO and Rachel nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeckind (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
47. I found him to be insufferable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:58 PM Response to Reply #47 |
81. His logic was infallable and they are responsible for their own embarassments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:02 AM Response to Reply #81 |
86. Instead of attacking who is not here can you respond to what I said instead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
58. The problem is the two wings of the Party and each Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
69. Think about this. Clinton got the tax bill passed, but there was no way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:53 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Obama's HCR reform was insanely weak compared to Clinton's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:54 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Which one is now law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:54 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. I think my point went way over your head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 11:56 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. You get the strongest legislation that will pass out of the Senate. Why is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:51 AM Response to Reply #77 |
107. How was Clinton able to get unpopular legislation through the senate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:04 AM Response to Reply #70 |
87. The point is, the president normally has one shot at getting a major piece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:12 AM Response to Reply #87 |
91. The point is that Obama had much greater majorites and got far less done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:15 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Than Clinton??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nckjm (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
95. Well, he sure bugged me tonight! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 04:47 AM Response to Original message |
97. Damn I missed it. I'll look for clips. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
102. I noticed he was screaming at Jane Hamsher, too, it was weird. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
103. The tax increases were in the budget - and passing the budget needs just 50 votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:50 AM Response to Reply #103 |
106. And Obama couldn't have done the same with his budget? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:36 AM Response to Reply #106 |
112. Not at this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 11:09 AM Response to Reply #112 |
116. I understand that. They didn't see this problem coming in 2009 nor earlier this year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
108. It's NOT passing a tax increase..it's letting tax cuts lapse..NOT the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realFedUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
110. Not a fan of his. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:28 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. I would love for them to replace him with Cenk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
114. Larry and his wife will get tons of extra cash from the cut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
morningglory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
117. I like him, but he spoke out against the "public option" and has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC