Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Administration Searches for Way to Arrest Julian Assange

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:14 PM
Original message
Obama Administration Searches for Way to Arrest Julian Assange
Administration Searches for Way to Arrest Julian Assange
By: David Dayen
November 30, 2010

At one level, the United States has responded to the Wikileaks release of State Department cables by tightening their internal operations, basically looking at their own insufficiencies in protecting information. I think they have an unrealistic expectation because of the inherent insecurity of information in a technological age, but at least they’re pointing the finger in the proper direction.

At the other level, the US is straining to find a suitable law with which to charge Julian Assange, who is not an American citizen and who did not engage in this particular practice on American soil.

WikiLeaks founder could be charged under Espionage Act
By Ellen Nakashima and Jerry Markon
Washington Post Staff Writers
November 30, 2010

"Federal authorities are investigating whether WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange violated criminal laws in the group’s release of government documents, including possible charges under the Espionage Act, sources familiar with the inquiry said Monday.

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said the Justice Department and Pentagon are conducting “an active, ongoing criminal investigation.” Others familiar with the probe said the FBI is examining everyone who came into possession of the documents, including those who gave the materials to WikiLeaks and also the organization itself. No charges are imminent, the sources said, and it is unclear whether any will be brought."

Holder was asked Monday how the United States could prosecute Assange, who is an Australian citizen. "Let me be very clear," he replied. "It is not saber rattling.

But when it comes to Assange, Jeffrey H. Smith, a former CIA general counsel, said: "I'm confident that the Justice Department is figuring out how to prosecute him."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/29/AR2010112905973.html


This really isn’t much of a case. First off, they’d have to get Assange arrested abroad and extradited to the US, which isn’t terribly likely. In fact, just today Ecuador offered him a home. The US doesn’t seem to have much problem with kidnapping people they don’t like off a foreign street, but that’s approximately what it would take.

Legal experts seem to agree that there’s not much of a case here. That’s why I’m disturbed by these comments from Eric Holder, which sound extremely familiar:

"To the extent there are gaps in our laws," Holder continued, "we will move to close those gaps, which is not to say . . . that anybody at this point, because of their citizenship or their residence, is not a target or a subject of an investigation that's ongoing." He did not indicate that Assange is being investigated for possible violations of the Espionage Act.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/29/AR2010112905973.html


This sounds like a job for John Yoo.

Read the full article at:

http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/11/30/administration-searches-for-way-to-arrest-julian-assange/









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah. because Julian is way more dangerous than war criminals. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. And this administration is different from Bush's....
HOW???????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Look for the little letter after the president's name. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. All recent presidents and 90% of Congress should have a big "C" behind their names. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Real little
You practically need a microscope to see it clearly lately!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. And he's super cute!
I hear he also plays a mean game of chess. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Don't forget popular. His popularity excuses everything. nt
Edited on Tue Nov-30-10 12:32 PM by BlueIris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Plus, he looks good in a bathing suit and has a nice family. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. And he makes the kids like it. Without him, the Democrats will lose the youth vote.
Edited on Tue Nov-30-10 01:28 PM by BlueIris
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. If you can't figure that out....
Then I'm not sure anyone can help you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Meanwhile, Bush is on a book tour.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Being treated with respect by media goons and politicians alike. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Xe Services is probably bidding for this job
maybe it's going to be Mossad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. They did it with Marc Emory, for selling EVIL POT SEEDS
Seriously, he is a Canadian citizen, and the US government had him arrested and extradited

All for selling seeds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Just declare him an enemy combatant
Did the lawless Bush administration teach you nothing?! It's like they've completely forgotten the extralegal trail blazed by those pioneers of latter day doctrines of the divine right of kings John Yoo, Alberto Gonzales, Patrick Philbin and Robert Delahunty.

So sad that the evil wrought by these men should be so quickly forgotten by their successors. We need a new Ezra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Oh, we remember.
WE were the ones who wanted them prosecuted. That never happened either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. I hope Assange gets the bank stuff out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. at long last Holder is actually doing something....
now if he would only do something worthwhile. Like PROSECUTING TORTURERS AND WAR CRIMINALS.

Assange did not spy on the US. The information was sent to Wikileaks. He offered the government a chance to review it and blackout what they wanted prior to publication. They refused. Well, fuck them. What a bunch of fucktards this administration has turned out to be. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuclearDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. That's it, I'm not voting for Obama in 2012
I'm fucking tired of this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. *That's* it?
I was done more than a year ago. I'm shocked by people who are really shocked by the Admin's reaction to this latest development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oh, and is Holder going to arrest The New York Times, too?
Edited on Tue Nov-30-10 12:56 PM by EFerrari
They were also middle men in this release.

Does their contempt for the media and the First Amendment extend to them, too or is it just for media organizations that don't take dictation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'll get blasted here for saying this but I find very little if any difference
between the Obama DOJ and the Bush DOJ. This department is not about justice. It is a mockery of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Jesus, what a bunch of shit.
Let's not do anything about the real criminals! I hope Mr. Assange stays safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. Nobdy cares that a CIA agent was outed by the sitting Vice-President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. Arrest would be nicer than blowing him to bits with a drone
Like we do to others waging war against us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. Would this not fall under the rule of freedom of the press?
He did not take the documents but he has a journalistic responsibility to reveal to the public...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
26. Instead of wasting time looking for ways to arrest Wikileaks, Obama should be
focusing on those WHO were involved in those illegal activities.

Namely:

All the Republicans.

Including:

Chimp W. Fuckwad
Darth N. Noheart
John Asscroft
Donald Duck
Michael Bolton (not the singer)
Sleazy Rice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. +1,000,000
I'd be okay with Michael Bolton the singer being arrested, too. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC