Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channel (Their WikiLeaks Front Page Article)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:29 PM
Original message
NY Times: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channel (Their WikiLeaks Front Page Article)
Edited on Sun Nov-28-10 01:37 PM by Hissyspit
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/world/29cables.html?_r=1&hp

Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels

By SCOTT SHANE and ANDREW W. LEHREN
Published: November 28, 2010

WASHINGTON — A cache of a quarter-million confidential American diplomatic cables, most of them from the past three years, provides an unprecedented look at backroom bargaining by embassies around the world, brutally candid views of foreign leaders and frank assessments of nuclear and terrorist threats.

- snip -

The cables, a huge sampling of the daily traffic between the State Department and some 270 embassies and consulates, amount to a secret chronicle of the United States’ relations with the world in an age of war and terrorism. Among their revelations, to be detailed in The Times in coming days:

¶ A dangerous standoff with Pakistan over nuclear fuel: Since 2007, the United States has mounted a highly secret effort, so far unsuccessful, to remove from a Pakistani research reactor highly enriched uranium that American officials fear could be diverted for use in an illicit nuclear device. In May 2009, Ambassador Anne W. Patterson reported that Pakistan was refusing to schedule a visit by American technical experts because, as a Pakistani official said, “if the local media got word of the fuel removal, ‘they certainly would portray it as the United States taking Pakistan’s nuclear weapons,’ he argued.”

- snip -

¶ Bargaining to empty the Guantánamo Bay prison: When American diplomats pressed other countries to resettle detainees, they became reluctant players in a State Department version of “Let’s Make a Deal.” Slovenia was told to take a prisoner if it wanted to meet with President Obama, while the island nation of Kiribati was offered incentives worth millions of dollars to take in a group of detainees, cables from diplomats recounted. The Americans, meanwhile, suggested that accepting more prisoners would be “a low-cost way for Belgium to attain prominence in Europe.”

¶ Suspicions of corruption in the Afghan government: When Afghanistan’s vice president visited the United Arab Emirates last year, local authorities working with the Drug Enforcement Administration discovered that he was carrying $52 million in cash. With wry understatement, a cable from the American Embassy in Kabul called the money “a significant amount” that the official, Ahmed Zia Massoud, “was ultimately allowed to keep without revealing the money’s origin or destination.” (Mr. Massoud denies taking any money out of Afghanistan.)

- snip -

¶ Mixed records against terrorism: Saudi donors remain the chief financiers of Sunni militant groups like Al Qaeda, and the tiny Persian Gulf state of Qatar, a generous host to the American military for years, was the “worst in the region” in counterterrorism efforts, according to a State Department cable last December. Qatar’s security service was “hesitant to act against known terrorists out of concern for appearing to be aligned with the U.S. and provoking reprisals,” the cable said

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you compare this to the Guardian or El Pais, the NYT article has a peculiar slant to it
Recommended but with caution. Thank you for posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. FOX news will love that Guantanamo bit. We tried to pay a country millions to take prisoners. This
is going to be interesting. Some intriguing bits of info in those short paragraphs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm more interested in the pre-2009 communications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm sorry, but so far this sounds boring
I'm all for these leaks, but I certainly hope there's some content here other than what diplomats are gossiping about behind backs.

Who cares?

Where are the cables that prove US military is used to advance the interests of global capitalists? That's what I wanna know.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Well, this is the New York Times.
Maybe some other news outlet will cover that part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Human rights activists at risk?
This is all interesting but one part concerns me. Is wikileaks showing the same concern for informants and foreign human rights activists?


Many more cables name diplomats’ confidential sources, from foreign legislators and military officers to human rights activists and journalists, often with a warning to Washington: “Please protect” or “Strictly protect.”

The Times has withheld from articles and removed from documents it is posting online the names of some people who spoke privately to diplomats and might be at risk if they were publicly identified. The Times is also withholding some passages or entire cables whose disclosure could compromise American intelligence efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The Times might withhold names
but I'm betting other sites won't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I should have finished the article.
Those collections of dispatches were placed online by WikiLeaks, with selective redactions of the Afghan documents and much heavier redactions of the Iraq reports. The group has said it intends to post the documents in the current trove as well, after editing to remove the names of confidential sources and other details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Spain's El Pais is claiming they will withhold names and sensitive information
that could hurt people. In other words they aren't going to do any Valerie Plame outings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I still wonder how they will decide
what will hurt or not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. We are moving into a new age.
Let's hope our leaders can handle the transition without succumbing to the vapors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haikugal Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. How??
How does someone carry 52 Million in cash?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Same way the Pentagon shipped a few billion in cash to Iraq.
Big honking airplane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. $100 bills are compact. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC