Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blue Dog survivor blames Obama, Pelosi for losses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
harvey007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:43 PM
Original message
Blue Dog survivor blames Obama, Pelosi for losses
Source: Miami Herald

WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. Ben Chandler said last week he partially blames the Obama administration and U.S. House leadership for Democrats' election losses and his extremely narrow re-election.

"If not there, where else does the responsibility lie?" said Chandler, D-Ky., who had endorsed Barack Obama during the 2008 presidential election. "You're talking about the loss of 60 or something seats held by capable public servants. There had to be something going on at a level above them. If that isn't the lesson, I don't know what is."

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/11/27/1946244/surviving-blue-dog-blames-obama.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. None of that personal accountability stuff for him I guess. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. The failure of Senate blue dogs to pass more of Obama's agenda.
That's where the responsibility lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Ditto, Ditto...you took the words right out of my mouth.
Hey Mr. Blue Dog...Maybe those other "DINO" Blue Dogs, should
have grown a pair and found a spine, to stand with Democrats
and Progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. There had to be something going on at a level above them.
How about the people recognized that Congress in general (regardless of party) no longer works for the betterment of the average citizen, but now is a willing captive of the same corporate forces that are responsible for causing all our economic misery.

I'd say those reelected were just lucky, rightfully the whole lot should have lost in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Well said. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey Chandler - consider yourself damn lucky.
Edited on Sat Nov-27-10 11:17 PM by Hawkeye-X
You could have easily lost. But next time you won't be so lucky as we continue to purge Blue Fake Republican-Lites away from the Democratic Party and the eventual demise of the DLC, returning to its progressive roots.

Oh, and Ben? You even have a less of a voice in the party, you know - 75% of your fellow 'Dogs were defeated. Think about that, a-hole. At the same time, consider the famous Truman quote. And he's right.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pot, meet kettle. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubicleGuy Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somebody hand this guy...
... a mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. My thoughts exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. FDR was elected president four times for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Perhaps you should look in the mirror sir
I hate to say it but of the 25 or so Dems I know none save myself and my SO voted,-because as the general comment was "why bother" they're all in the corporate pocket, there to help themselves and no one else ect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not Blue Dog but Republican IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. He doesn't know his history.
Before the election was even held, PBS's Need to Know did a feature on midterm losses by the party in power.

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/video/in-perspective-jon-meacham-on-superlativism/3665/

And here, on the midterm question, is what the past teaches us: Every president from FDR to Bill Clinton — every president, Democrat and Republican–has lost House seats in at least one midterm election. In 1938, FDR lost 71 house seats; eight years later, Harry Truman lost 55 — in 1994 Bill Clinton lost 54. Republicans took some hits of their own. Eisenhower lost 18 seats in 1954 and 48 in 1958; the Watergate year of 1974 cost the GOP 48 seats, and Ronald Reagan lost 26 in 1982.

So if you believe that the likely Democratic defeats this fall are epochal, then logic demands that you designate every four years since 1938 as an epoch. I’d suggest instead that midterms past and present are less about grand redefinitions of American politics and more about the perennial fickleness of the American voter.


On top of that, voter participation tends to drop in the midterms and pick up in presidential elections.

There are too many factors that go into this, and Chandler's asking himself the wrong questions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. fuck 'em n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. Tell the people decided to choose a real Republican over a fake
Republican --it is that simple.

Ask him about those Blue Dogs that: 1) the GOP did not targe
the COC did not target. After all these BDs vote with Republicans.
and the COC considered them friends.

They did not vote for the Stimulus, HCR etc.

However, they did trash the Democratic Party, Nancy Pelosi
and Obama. When they campaigned you would have thought
they were Republicans.

Simple, People chose real Republicans over Fakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Second Stone Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. Voters voted for somebody else?
Voters are supposedly at the highest level. Vote turnout? Those who do not get their votes out lose? Blue dogs suck?

I'll go with Blue Dogs suck and Democrats are tired of voting for Blue Dogs. I don't vote for Blue Dogs, I don't donate to them, and I don't work for their campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. Not a fan of this guy.
Here in KY he is seen as a RINO by many progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mfcorey1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. Consider the 2010 elections a cleansing of all that blue dog impurity. They held up things and in
some cases voted with he opposition. Their selfish manipulations, in some instances, derailed things in health care, financial reform, and other issues causing a need for unnecessary compromising. Replace them in 2012 with some extremely left real Democrats. As for now, Chandler can stick it and hope that he survives another election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC