Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Student protests: Met under fire for charging at demonstrators (UK)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 07:11 PM
Original message
Student protests: Met under fire for charging at demonstrators (UK)
from the Guardian UK:



Video: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/nov/26/student-protests-police-under-fire


Scotland Yard is under mounting pressure after video footage emerged of officers on horseback charging into a crowd of protesters during a demonstration against rises in university tuition fees, 24 hours after they denied that horses charged the crowd.

Footage posted on YouTube showed mounted police riding at speed into a crowd of around 1,000 protesters who had gathered south of Trafalgar Square on Wednesday night.

Asked about whether there were horse charges at a meeting of the Metropolitan Police Authority the following day, the Met commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, replied: "Certainly that's not … I was at the debrief last night, there was no reference to that whatsoever and I have no reference to it."

Pressed by MPA member Joanne McCartney to clarify the situation, he replied: "Of course I will, but in doing that I don't want to then create a headline saying I'm acknowledging something's happened."

Later that day a Met spokesperson said: "Police horses were involved in the operation, but that didn't involve charging the crowd." The spokesperson said horses may have been used "to help control the crowd for everyone's benefit", but added "police officers charging the crowd – we would say: no, they did not charge the crowd." ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/nov/26/student-protests-police-under-fire



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I saw the video - the mounted police clearly charged into the crowd
People scattered, the police on foot manhandled people who didn't move fast enough. It was mass pandemonium.

All caused by the police.

This is huge in the U.K. right now. I'd be surprised if there weren't some Met resignations over this. They clearly lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Remember the riots at the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago?
The later investigation came to the conclusion that it was a police riot. It sounds like that is exactly what happened in this case: the police deliberately created a situation where they felt they could get away with turning a peaceful protest violent and then escalating the violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Watched it live on TV, then they tried to change the facts as
to what happened, they went into hotel rooms and beat people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh, yes. The concept of "agent provacateur" has been around a LONG time.
Sometimes they're planted, sometimes they're ordinary citizens PUSHED into reacting.

The main idea is to DISCREDIT the protester's points by painting them as "extremists".

And most of the time, it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. But the agent provacateur is *not* what we are referring
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 10:17 PM by tblue37
to here. The agent provacateur is disguised as a member of the protest group, one who deliberately commits mayhem and violence so it will get blamed on the protesters, or who tries to persuade the protesters to get violent.

But that is not what was going on here. Instead, the police were deliberately trapping the protesters and even bystanders who were not part of the protest--"kettling" them, as one protester referred to it (apparently that is the actual term for it in UK)--and not allowing them to leave the "pen." Then they would, on cue, either begin clubbing them with nightsticks or getting up into their faces and yelling, or else pepper spraying them or otherwise manhandling them and brutalizing them. Also, as these reports show, they would charge them with their horsses, to create panic, so they could then attack the victims when they panicked and tried to get away from the "pen."

That is not the same as the agent provacateur, though I have no doubt that they had the protest group salted with those, too.

Like the Chicago riot in 1968, this time the only ones rioting were the police. The protesters were being peaceful, but the police were violently attacking them for no real reason at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yeah, I realized that after I posted
It's not exactly the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The same thing happened at Pitt during the Pittsburgh G-20
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scruffy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. I remember all too well
My first job as a "reporter". Too dumb to get out of the way I guess. Still am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Always take cameras, and use them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R. "The whole world is watching!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
The truth always outs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC