Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Probability of Cancer from TSA scans? 1/30mil "US Airlines: 500+ mil people fly/yr"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:23 PM
Original message
Probability of Cancer from TSA scans? 1/30mil "US Airlines: 500+ mil people fly/yr"
Expert: "Only one in 30 million people will probably get cancer from scanners." US Airlines: "532 million people fly per year"

-- With this coming Wednesday the busiest travel day of the year, many Americans will soon be subjected to radiation-emitting body scanners at the nation's airports.

Despite a rising tide of concerns and complaints in recent weeks over body scanners, most experts say the radiation exposure from these machines is too low to pose any serious health threat.

Peter Rez, a professor of physics at Arizona State University, said that when a scanner is working properly the amount of radiation exposed is very low.

"The probability of getting a fatal cancer is about one in 30 million, which puts it lower than the probability of being killed by being struck by lightning in any year in the United States, which is about one in 5 million," he said.

http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/healthday/646395.html

U.S. airlines carried 561.9 million scheduled domestic and international passengers during the first nine months of 2006.

Peter Smith

Webmaster

http://www.globester.com/


Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_people_fly_in_a_year#ixzz16FyqjOCo

---------> Nod to Fark for the headline/OP Title
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure, but add that on to the number of times a person is subjected to radiation from
medical and dental x-rays, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. With our health care? Pretty much none :) (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. That may apply to the younger generation. I m 87, now. and I can't tell you how many tmes I have
been x-rayed in my lifetime - so far. I'd say I've had more than my share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. is it ionizing radiation that causes mutations within the outer 10 mm of skin?
because this stuff does that.

oh, and people are saying that if it can see through casts, which TSA is touting, then it's pumping out more radiation than TSA is reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's one thing if you're an occasional traveler who gets scanned once.
It's another if you're a flight attendant or pilot that has to get scanned daily as part of the job...

or worse, if you're a TSA agent that gets to stand next to the machine absorbing stray x-rays 8 hours a day, every day, for years. The cumulative dose has got to add up in that case...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. If your cast or limb gets scanned, apparently 10 scans targeted at that part of your body are req'd
no opt out.

each time you fly.

once you start the screening it must be completed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. And
That means 17-18 people a year.

Then wait until those folks file a massive lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. And they will be able to prove it how?
The basic statistics are that 13% of all deaths are cancer related. 1/30 million added risk translates to about one extra cancer death every 4 years per six billion scans.

Gasoline fumes (more specifically the benzene in it) are more likely to cause cancer (leukemia) (particularly in children) than an Airport X-ray scanner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. You get more ionizing radiation from flying
At 30,000 feet, you are above 70% of the atmosphere. That means that you are exposed to much more cosmic radiation from space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. All the more reason to want to avoid further exposure
If I smoked half a pack a day, it would be fallicious to say a couple more won't really hurt. Dose-response functions are generally linear. The higher up the dose you already are, the greater the chance of harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Apparently flying way up in the sky in a plane will garner you more radiation and they have
not found increased cancer rates amongst stewardesses, stewarts or pilots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well 20 years from now they might find out
Edited on Wed Nov-24-10 11:40 PM by LisaL
whether there are increased skin cancer rates among those undergoing TSA x-rays screenings. Do you think they know it now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC