Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TSA agents aren't changing latex gloves between touching bare armpits, buttocks, and genitals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:41 PM
Original message
TSA agents aren't changing latex gloves between touching bare armpits, buttocks, and genitals
TSA pat-downs could spread sexually-transmitted disease and contribute to pandemics
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) There's a startling fact about the TSA pat-downs that most of us have not realized: TSA agents often do not change their latex gloves between pat-downs! With these pat-down reaching into your pants, feeling your genitals, and sweeping bare armpits and buttocks, those latex gloves being worn by the TSA agents are obviously teeming with germs.

And yet TSA agents often don't change gloves between patting down passengers. They're often using the same gloves on you and your crotch as they were using on the previous passenger's exploratory crotch feel.

This means, of course, that the TSA is now engaged in extremely risky behavior that could spread sexually-transmitted disease, cold viruses, skin fungi (such as ringworm), and even contribute to a pandemic outbreak.

So now, while the TSA claims to be protecting your safety, they could actually be infecting you with pandemic disease at the same time.

New aggressive pat-downs do not meet medical standards for sterility
None of this was a problem when the TSA pat-downs were merely touching the outside of peoples' clothing. But in the last few weeks, the TSA changed its pat-down procedure to include feeling down your pants and inside your underwear.

Air travel passengers across America have been complaining of the TSA fingering their genitalia and touching their sex organs. Just this week, an ABC News employee was fingered by a TSA agent who felt around inside her underwear (http://www.naturalnews.com/030492_T...). This process of touching traveler's genitals without consistently changing latex gloves means the TSA is involved in extremely risky behavior that could spread disease.

TSA agents are not trained as medical personnel. Just as they don't seem to grasp the Bill of Rights, they also may not understand how infectious disease is spread. They aren't medical personnel; they're Big Brother enforcers who have likely never been taught the principles of how to conduct a sterile body search.

http://www.naturalnews.com/030495_TSA_infectious_disease.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yay, a new disease vector. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. Could be done purposefully too.
Just load your pants prior to your screening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
24. Exactly. What are these people thinking?
More evidence that this has nothing to do with keeping anyone "safe".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Go through the scanner if you're concerned about filth transfer.
How many more TSA threads out there? You're working yourselves into a lather over nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lbrtbell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nothing?
Either you don't fly, or else you're a pervert who wants strangers fondling you with filthy gloves.

As for how many TSA threads there are, it's called concern. If there were a myriad of threads about Bristol Palin on DWTS, that would be an annoyance, but this is a legitimate news item.

If legitimate news items bother you, may I suggest you create an account at a non-news forum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Is this DU?
Seems like I've seen more stupid-ass, simplistic, right-wing crap here today than I've seen in the five-plus years I've been a member here. Now I remember why I've been frequenting this place less and less...frequently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, it's DU, unfortunately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Well...
A lot of it is simplistic.

On the other hand, the world is seldom so nicely divided into pure black and pure white, pure (D) and pure (R). There's overlap in some attitudes and beliefs, meaning overlap in principle; and there's overlap in outcome, where (D) and (R) oppose or agree on something for utterly different reasons.

Sometimes the all-important group boundary finds itself around large percentages of (D) and (R), however distasteful it may be to them to find that the (D) vs (R) boundary isn't the end-all and be-all of existence and utterly disgusting those for whom the (D) vs (R) boundary *is* the end-all and be-all of existence.

Which reminds me, while simultaneously being a propos of nothing (except perhaps the IPA I've been drinking to excess), that there are some radishes in the garden ready to harvest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. It's authoritarianism, and the mentality is in both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
57. +1000000000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. no shit. If I wanted to read crap like that all day I would go to Free Republic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #28
60. Ummm... WorldNut Daily was first with the cooties angle on this
Edited on Sat Nov-27-10 02:43 AM by jberryhill

The assertion that they aren't changing gloves is not based on a single sourced observation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. It is now...been here 9+ years.....
it ain't the same place at all...sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Not everyone has that choice.
If the scanner shows some medical device, a colostomy or urostomy bag, for example, than you HAVE to go through a pat down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Medical staff take infection pretty seriously
Security staff should too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Nate Silver of the New York Times wanted to go through the scanner
...instead of being groped.

The machine showed something in his back pocket, when there wasn't anything in his back pocket.

So Nate Silver was scanned-and-groped.

Senator Mike Johanns (R-NE) was also scanned-and-groped. He asked TSA Chief John Pistole about it. Pistole said he may have been chosen at random to be groped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Pistole is a thug and low functioning mental midget
His Hero would be a guy like Josef Kramer



Josef Kramer (November 10, 1906 – December 13, 1945) was the Commandant of the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp. Dubbed "The Beast of Belsen" by camp inmates; he was a notorious Nazi war criminal, directly responsible for the deaths of thousands of Jews and other people. He was convicted of war crimes and hanged in Hamelin prison by noted British executioner Albert Pierrepoint after World War II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
39. That's the part some don't get. Going through the scanner is not an automatic pass on the grope step
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
42. I would if...
there were no x-ray emissions (I've had enough to last several lifetimes) and doing so wouldn't trigger and automatic pat-down due to the metal rod in my neck.

But if you like to be sexually assaulted on a regular basis, nobody's stopping YOU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
47. Who let the sheep in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
54. That's the dumbest fucking comment on this site.
Edited on Thu Nov-25-10 10:04 PM by Lucian
By far.

Congratulations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like they are more concerned about protecting themselves
than serving the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
32. Yes. Gloves are for the protection of the wearer & not good for infection control...
even under ideal conditions ie: changing gloves and hand washing between each person touched. Failing to change gloves renders them useless in protecting those being examined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. If the choice is an x-ray or a grope, the public is screwed either way.
Edited on Wed Nov-24-10 08:58 PM by LibDemAlways
What assurances do we have that the TSA workers are competent to operate the x-ray machines? Each state has a set of laws that govern training and licensing of x-ray technicians, yet I have been unable to find any information at all about whether TSA personnel are exempt from these regulations and, if so, what kind of training they receive. I have a feeling that this crack work force, recruited off of pizza box advertising, has no idea what the hell its doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. +10
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
34. +++
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
35. +(1e+03). Deserves own thread. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. On another site someone posted that those who operate
the machines receive 2 days of training. That's it.

I think the public deserves some answers. Why are potentially cancer-causing machines installed in the airport in the first place? And why are unqualified individuals being allowed to operate them in clear violation of state laws?

I've already written a letter to the Radiologic Health Board of the state of California and am hoping for some sort of answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
45. +100 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. FUBAR
I don't think they thought this through, other than as a handout to an important (politically) vendor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. demonstrates clearly how much they care about their weTHEpeople vs their OWN interest
GROSS :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. Well isn't that special


I had a feeling (no pun intended) that this was the case.

I can only imagine the diseases already spreading. Those warm, moist places grow all sorts of stuff.










yeehaw!

A Nationwide TSASTD!!!!!!!! Cuzz we cares abowt yer saftie!!!!!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
17. TSA is going to lose this fight
It's too invasive and every grope will become a security issue. They will create millions of security risks as travelers squirm and complain and sue and scream. No two people will react the same way. One will curse, one will cry, one will wet themselves, one will take badge numbers. Non-exempt Congressmen and women's families will complain first. Cops and firefighters' families next. Soldiers and their families will follow. As will EMT's. All will demand to know how they can be trusted in their daily lives but not to fly without being groped. Teachers will want to know how parents can trust their kids to them but not trust the educators to fly. Doctors will ask why they can do heart surgery but can't be trusted to fly. Lawyers will ask all kinds of questions and take notes for future lawsuits. Everyone will be united against TSA.And TSA will stop requiring anyone to go through anything other than metal detectors because they won't want to deal with the nastiness they will inevitably bring on themselves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
43. It's not TSA per se. They are following the *orders* directly from the govnmt/DHS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. Gah!! They wear gloves for a reason, so they have to know about the germ concept.
Edited on Thu Nov-25-10 02:11 AM by chill_wind
They know they have to wear gloves to protect THEMSELVES. And this is all the further they and their superiors (supervisors and trainers) can think??? God we really are becoming a third world nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. This is so out of control.
The very young, the elderly, pregnant women.

WTF. We're so sold down the river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
44. I can't imagine ANYONE going along with this...and yet even here...
there are too many defending this!!!

Really big W.T.F.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
25. This disgusting public health warning needs to go "viral" so to speak
Insisting on clean gloves is not a crime.

When will the first "immaculate conception" happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. This is Rumsfeldian. They wear the gloves to give the appearance of care
Edited on Thu Nov-25-10 02:36 AM by EFerrari
not to protect the TSA agents, bet me.

/oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
29. I can't wait to buy a pair of these gloves on e-Bay.
Because you know, they'll be selling them there by Black Friday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
30. Now that is nasty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
31. Read and weep..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paper Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
33. Gross, I can't think of a better word at the moment.
This info turns my stomach. If I opted (which I never would) for the body search, I'd demand new gloves.
That would probably put me on the "No Fly" list.

This information should go viral, tell everyone you know.

Cooties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
37. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
40. But I thought
the government was trying to protect us?


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
41. Feeling around inside your underwear isn't a pat down.
To think for a youngster this may be the first person other than their parent when they were babies to feel around down there. Don't molesters get in trouble for this sort of thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
46. The public health communicable disease aspect of this has been deep-sixed entirely.
It is a dangerous risk.


These TSA agents are not changing gloves between each passenger they put their hands on.



Remember the man whose urostomy bag burst during the *enhanced assault*, contaminating himself and his surroundings?


How about transmission of herpes infections? Lice? Gonorrhea? Worse?


I just cannot imagine the potential outcome of these authoritarian actions by TSA/Homeland Security on the populace. It is indefensible from any direction.




Maybe the CDC would like to comment?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
48. K & R
Ughhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katnapped Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
49. Nothing to see here!
Just a bunch of ungrateful people again beating up on TSA agents who did nothing to deserve this (and our dear leader who just wants to make us SAFE from the boogeyman)

Move along, people....

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
50. Wait until a confirmed STD case involving a minor happens ...
the shit will hit the fan.

The TSA will of course blame the child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #50
58. The surrender monkeys that are always hand wringing about how the TeaPubliKlans
will react haven't considered this.

Wait till some sweet lil blond girl gets something off a glove. They'll probably blame the father and her older brother till they are found clean instead of realizing that they stood up for a bunch of crap that will reap a hell of a whirlwind.

As always, the media will be cruel, stupid, and relentless. Mika Mouse will shake her head and use hushed tones as she talks about a scarred little girl, spoiled and infected before she had her first crush or kiss.

Maybe then they will learn the value of doing the right thing and having principles that do not change on the whims of politicians' machinations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #50
59. or a plane blows up despite this bullshit as it eventually will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thanks_imjustlurking Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
51. Of course not. The gloves are to protect *them*, not *us*. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
52. Look what I picked up at the airport, honey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
53. But hey, at least we won't be blown out of the sky by a genital bomb.
:eyes: :eyes: :eyes:

Or, the one I like: "It's not a big deal and it only takes a few minutes."

:eyes: :eyes: :eyes:

Anyone who doesn't mind this needs to get their heads examined. Now they're touching bare crotches? No. I will never fly if they feel the need to grab my bare junk. Touching one's genitals outside the pants is one thing, but now if they're putting their hands down your underwear, that's a totally different story. I will not stand for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
55. This article has me leaning towards getting X-rayed if I have to choose...
...but after going through the X-ray they may tell me that the scanner showed something (false positive) & I may get both X-rayed and groped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Exactly. They don't even have to explain to you why they decided
to pat you down after they scanned you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
61. These have a chemical in them that detects explosive residue
under lights?

So they are also rubbing a chemical on your skin? Swell.

It just gets better and better.



Is that correct?

Just heard Ian say this on Coast To Coast


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
this_side_up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
62. latex creates lots of dust
which everyone inhales but you don't know it...yet.

If you are already severely allergic, get the inhaler(s) and possibly ambulance
at the ready.

If you are not currently allergic,
difficult how long.

The goobermint does not have the right to
inflict anyone's airway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC