Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Grandmama, they touched you on your special girl parts"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:47 PM
Original message
"Grandmama, they touched you on your special girl parts"
http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/region_pasco/new_port_richey/woman-on-tsa-pat-downs:-%27i-feel-molested%27-

“I feel molested. I’d like to go take a shower with Lysol (afterwards),” Miernik said, describing the pat downs, which she said includes being “touched all over.”

Miernik said the worst experience she had came when her 7-year-old granddaughter was at the airport with her. When her granddaughter saw the pat down, “She went ‘Grandmama, they touched you on your special girl spots.’”

Miernik was mortified, as was her granddaughter, she said.. She believes the pat downs are unnecessarily intrusive, and she hasn’t even experienced the “more aggressive” pat downs the TSA started employing Oct. 29


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's all right, little girl. Uncle Sam loves you very much, and he has to touch you in special ways.
Because he loves you so much. One day you'll understand. Meantime don't EVER tell anyone how it feels to be felt like this. You would upset people who wouldn't understand. This is private, just between you and Uncle, understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh the drama.
The search for the most emotionally manipulative TSA search headline continues!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. how many xrays are reasonable to board an airplane?
i'd like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I am not agreeing with the security measures.
MY point is that whether or not these intrusions are sensible or not, the OUTRAGE over them is being driven by lies, half-truths and now overly emotional tugging of heart-strings, propagated by people who want to stir up anti-government hatred, much like what happened after Waco. DU has fallen for it, too.

It's a topic that can't be discussed rationally. It's a HUGE blow to the Obama administration - in fact, I believe Napolitano will lose her job over this. And all because of crazed outrage based on anecdotes and lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. What are you calling half-truths?
Edited on Sun Nov-21-10 05:03 PM by LisaL
What exactly do you think isn't happening despite people claiming it is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. That boy wasn't strip searched. The TSA is not "molesting" people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
44. It is actually molestation. What else would you call it?
Your private parts are aggressively touched, you are shown naked???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. IN order for it to be a crime . . .
. . . there MUST be an element of intent. Like in "for sexual gratification." Is there ANY evidence of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I see your point...is this article one of those lies (see below):
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/aviation/safety/the-problem-with-prosthetics-and-airport-security

The Problem With Prosthetics and Airport Security

Swabs are taken immediately in and around all prosthetics to detect for bomb-making material. The next step is to go under the CastScope. Once the operator is found, you go under the machine, prosthetic limbs still on. They take X-ray images on the front, back and sides—about 10 X-rays per below-the-knee prosthetic, more if your prosthesis has a mechanical knee. After these X-rays pass inspection, you're free to fly.

For Jeffrey J. Cain, a below-the-knee double amputee, "There's such variability in screening people with prosthetics," Cain says. Sometimes an amputee gets a pat-down after the backscatter scan (which isn't required); sometimes he or she is asked to remove a limb; and always, Cain says, there is confusion: "It's like being pulled over by the policeman—there's only one correct answer, and it's not that of the police department; it's that of the person in front of you."

========================

also was the man with the urostomy bag spilled on him an anecdote not worth outrage over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I am not saying that there aren't legitimate beefs, that's the problem -
they are lost in hyperbole, drama and half-truths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Should I consent to the Cast Scope X-RAYS (10 on average) without outrage?
I'm just wondering?

You can opt out of the whole body scan, but TSA is not saying I have any choice but to be x-rayed by Cast Scope.

Should I abandon my outrage?

Do you have any idea what some of us go through EVERY TIME WE FLY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Yes, I do. My uncle has two prosthetic legs.
I get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. then should i be outraged or should i consent to the x-ray?
and since i can't opt out (it appears) what other recourse do i have to get it changed?

understanding that, maybe you should be a little more tolerant of the outrage people are feeling.

i can assure you, it's not unfounded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. You're confusing me with someone who is not outraged.
I just choose to not be reactionary and propagate the half-truths and hyperbole. Quite frankly, as a survivor of abuse, I am seriously offended by the continued use of the term "molestation". The acts surrounding REAL molestation are really quite different than what the TSA is doing and it's harmful to put it in the same category.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jancantor Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. This is different from other issues how?
I agree with your point, but I see it on EVERY issue, not just this. The reality is that often when people agree with the underlying point, they accept the incendiary inaccurate (or at least unproven) language because it is seen as justified.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. I hope a lot of people lose their jobs over this.
I have no problem with the issue being approached from an emotional standpoint - because it IS an extremely emotional issue for people. I find that to be far more appropriate than the clinical "by the numbers" approach the TSA is taking, as if humans are assembly line items to be examined, manipulated and processed, rather than people with actual feelings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. Name one rational thing about this policy
Take your time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I won't. Because I don't think it's rational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. So you think it's not rational
But you think we're exaggerating the issue, and we shouldn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
47. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
53. I agree. The pat-downs are too much, but not because they make little girls cry
The scans, the body searches - none of this is making anything safer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. do I win?
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Maybe. It's a close call.
It's hard to compete with headlines of rape survivors and child molestation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheIdiot Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Easy to tell...
who doesn't have a 7-year-old daughter around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
45. What do you mean a 7 yo daughter....
Edited on Sun Nov-21-10 06:07 PM by AnneD
My 20 yo daughter has had to travel several times this week. her comment to me was..."Mom, it wasn't a pat down, they actually went in my vulva. I jumped back instinctively. If a date had done that to me I would have popped them". The reason for the pat down,,,,she had a scrunchy that showed up funny on the x-ray. I have my doubts as I know the some TSA agents in Sky Harbor were charged with feeling up an inordinate number of young attractive women a few years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Those rights you refuse to defend will go away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. quiet now, by complaining, we are just trying to undermine Obama
or didn't you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Oh that's the latest
Funny I took qn oath, and I take it seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. it's funny that they think complaining about TSA will hurt Obama
as if he has anything to do with all this.

or does he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. CINC
So he does...trumman had it right as well...'thing bout a buck...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
51. all federal law enforcement agencies...
answer to the chief executive. So yes, he does. He could demand this stop and fire Pistole, but it won't happen. They are using these techniques to so thoroughly disgust the people that they would rather submit to the porno scanners. So, more will need to be purchased, and Chertoff will get richer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
50. he took an oath, too...
seems our "constitutional professor" president has forgotten it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. ROFL
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
56. For GOOD reason.
Wake the hell up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. My mother had a reflexive response to strike when startled...
We learned early on, never to sneak up on her as a practical joke or we might get a major smack. It truly was reflex. I have little doubt that if she were alive, this kind of treatment might well stimulate that response and it would have actually been involuntary. I suspect someone may well give into the urge and it won't be involuntary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm holding out for a story involving orphans and kittens. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. When I took my cat on the plane I had to get it of the carrier
for the carrier to be examined. Thank heaven that was before implementation of enhanced pat downs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. they x-rayed my cat
geniuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. You mean, in the new body scanner?
Did they make cat stand up with paws up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:06 PM
Original message
No, it was a long time ago...family member was told "that has to get xrayed"
so they put it through. (dumb on said family member's part)

but it was an animal carrier, security should have said, take the pet out and put the carrier through.

Philadelphia is one of the most notoriously bad places for airport security mishaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. It is. Maybe that's why some of us are more nervous about expanding TSA powers than others.
After all, it's the airport where TSA employees on several occasions played "practical jokes" where they pretended to find drugs in people's bags, or my favorite, where they made the four-year-old disabled child literally crawl through the scanner because they wouldn't let him wear his leg brace.

I wonder what all those mocking the outrage many of us have about this would say to that kid or his father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
35. Yes, you family member should have taken the cat
out of the carrier. I wonder how much radiation the poor animal got going through the baggage x-ray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. I could not have taken the cat out of the carrier
Edited on Sun Nov-21-10 05:18 PM by CreekDog
I was not there.

Yes, said family member should have, but security told them "that" has to go through and they took it literally.

Silly them, who would take airport security literally?...I mean, when airport security says something to me, I always answer, "you mean that figuratively, right?" and they always say,

"oh yes, we like to give out oblique direction...when we tell you something if you seem to get the 'gist' of what we're saying --then it's all good"

:dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. I am not blaiming your family member.
I was told to get the cat out. Not an easy thing to do with a freaked out animal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Yes, it's hard...and since I set off the metal detector, God knows what would've happened if I did
yikes. just yikes all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
52. who knows...
it could have been a really small terrorist in a cat suit :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Conure flew out, they tried to pat her down out of the sky
She flew into daddy's shirt and they ran carrier through...it was a bad day for the poor bird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I had to get my bird out of its cage too.
Edited on Sun Nov-21-10 05:05 PM by LisaL
I was told if I don't get it out I ain't getting on the plane.
It was scared and bit the hell out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Making you take an unclipped bird out of her cage? That seems like a recipe for disaster. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Thankfully she shirt dived
And then peeked out...love the bird.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Yes they make people take their birds out of cages.
I was made to do the same thing only I clipped my bird before getting on the plane. When I get it out it bit me because my bird is a biter. I tried to reason with them but it was either bird out of the cage or not getting on the plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Blind orphans with rescue kittens for me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Kittehs...they're cuter and induce more outrage when they're kittehs!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
54. I can haz patdown? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
49. There is an argument coming for privitazation.
Just so we all know where the media hype is headed.

I agree these measures are intrusive, but I doubt we'd be hearing much about it, if Haliburton were in charge of the security show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. They are not even hiding it anymore
Quite open on the teevee machine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. Yup. And once it's privatized, it'll be nearly impossible to "un-privatize"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
59. Oh fer gods sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC