Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Social Security Advocates Slam Obama's Cautious Response To Debt Commission Co-Chairs' Proposal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:29 PM
Original message
Social Security Advocates Slam Obama's Cautious Response To Debt Commission Co-Chairs' Proposal
WASHINGTON -- President Obama's cautious response to the fiscal commission co-chairs' proposal was "quite frankly, a disappointment," according to Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization for Women. The draft report would slash Social Security benefits for millions of Americans, hurting poor people and minorities in particular.

"These proposals to cut social security really push hundreds of thousands of middle class women into poverty," said O'Neill on a conference call with reporters Thursday afternoon. "Women are far more likely than men to head into their retirement years without savings and why is that? Well, when you work a lifetime with unequal pay, you have a hard time sucking away money for your own retirement."

Indeed, a new report issued by the Government Accountability Office found that raising the retirement age for Social Security would have a disproportionate impact on low-income workers and minorities.

Women today are paid 77 cents for every dollar earned by men, and for minority women, the pay is considerably worse.

The president earned the ire of Social Security advocates around the country when he told reporters last week that the commission's proposal deserved review rather than the dismissive response it received from leading Democrats like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

"President Obama did not come out clearly and forcefully in opposition to the co-chairs' proposal and quite frankly, that was a disappointment," said O'Neill.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/18/social-security-advocates_1_n_785539.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Slaughtering Social Security Is On the Table
The administration saved that debate for after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC