Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List of U.S. airports using full-body scanners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:16 PM
Original message
List of U.S. airports using full-body scanners
The Transportation Security Administration says there currently are 385 full-body scanners now in use at 68 airports U.S. airports.
These are the airports that currently are incude the scanners among their security checkpoint options:

• Albuquerque International Sunport Airport

• Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport

• Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport

• Boston Logan International Airport

• Boise Airport

• Brownsville, Texas

• Buffalo Niagara International Airport

• Charlotte Douglas International Airport

• Chicago O'Hare International Airport

• Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport

• Cleveland International Airport

• Columbus, Ohio: Port Columbus International Airport

• Corpus Christie Airport

• Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport

• Denver International Airport

• Detroit Metro Airport

• El Paso International Airport

• Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport

• Fort Wayne International Airport

• Fresno Airport

• Gulfport International Airport

• Grand Rapids Airport

• Harrisburg International Airport

• Harlingen/Valley International Airport

• Hartford: Bradley International Airport

• Honolulu International Airport

• Houston Bush Houston Interncontinental Airport

• Indianapolis International Airport

• Jacksonville International Airport

• Kansas City International

• Laredo International Airport

• Las Vegas McCarran International Airport

• Lihue Airport

• Los Angeles International Airport

• McAllen Miller Airport

• Memphis International Airport

• Miami International Airport

• Milwaukee General Mitchell Milwaukee International Airport

• Minneapolis/St.Paul International Airport

• Nashville International Airport

• New Orleans Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport

• New York John F. Kennedy International Airport

• New York LaGuardia International Airport

• Newark Liberty International Airport

• Oakland International Airport

• Omaha Eppley Field Airport

• Orlando International Airport

• Palm Beach International Airport

• Philadelphia International Airport

• Phoenix International Airport

• Pittsburgh International Airport

• Providence: T.F. Green Airport

• Raleigh-Durham International Airport

• Richmond International Airport

• Rochester International Airport

• St. Louis Lambert International Airport

• Salt Lake City International Airport

• San Antonio International Airport

• San Diego International Airport

• San Francisco International Airport

• San Jose Mineta International Airport

• San Juan Luis Munoz Marin International Airport

• Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

• Spokane International Airport

• Tampa International Airport

• Tulsa International Airport

• Washington Dulles International Airport

• Washington Reagan National Airport

Airports receiving imaging technology soon:

• Chicago Midway International Airport

• Houston William P. Hobby Airport

• Saipan International Airport


http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2010-11-18-airports-with-scanners_N.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. On the other hand, those scanners stop people like THIS guy...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. You know how I look at this? I'll be scanned at PBIA going up to
Jersey but not coming back from Atlantic City. I get on the plane and am sitting next to "Matt" and after about an hour I notice "Matt" has a strange attachment of some sort to his belt. He is now Muhammad and is angry at all evil Americans and wants to blow us all up. TSA employees don't know me, I will never see them again in my life and I would venture to say you've seen one screen you've seen them all. I will be scanned and grateful that "Matt" will not be on my flight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You know how I look at this? Radiation induced cancer equal probability to terrorists.
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 05:27 PM by Pholus
Guess it's better that I die from "friendly fire."

Edit: Forgot the SARCASM tag. I miss the days when we weren't scared of our own shadows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That radiation blast doesn't amount to anything more than the x-ray
you get at the dentist or a breast scan for cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. And terrorism has killed ~300 U.S. airline passengers in the last 10 years out of how many million?
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 06:02 PM by Pholus
Both are rare. Don't think for a moment that ANY exposure to ionizing radiation is safe. Every photon has a chance, however, small, of damaging one strand of DNA that then replicates repeatedly. And yes, the chance is small.

But so is the chance that a terrorist downs your flight.

So that's what that ASU prof did with his radiation calculation. And he gets that a given airline passenger has a roughly equal chance of dying from a single scan vs. being killed by a terrorist on that same flight.

So why are these machines essential again? The makers won't even GUARANTEE success (because they don't want liability of course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. These machines are essential so Chertoff can get richer..IMO...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I can agree to that one... sadly. Oh well, you have to die from SOMETHING... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sally cat Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Pistole:"But if it saves even one job (mine) isn't it worth it?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sally cat Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder how many defenders of the TSA were poo-pooing the "terror alerts" not long ago? Odd change
of beliefs and/or priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. On the other hand, those scanners probably stop people like THIS guy
<== scary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for posting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. I went through one inToronto last spring. It was a total non event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sally cat Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Not for everything in the nuclei of all your cells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. If a person is that concerned about radiation, he probably shouldn't be flying at all.
"Most of the scanners deliver less radiation than a passenger is likely to receive from cosmic rays while airborne, the report said. Scanned passengers may absorb from 0.1 to 5 microsieverts of radiation compared with 5 microsieverts on a flight from Dublin to Paris and 30 microsieverts between Frankfurt and Bangkok, the report said. A sievert is a unit of measure for radiation."

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aoG.YbbvnkzU

It is a matter of concern and practice should be monitored, but would it stop me from flying?...No. And think about the exposure we get just walking around outside on a sunny day. It's a scary world out there, but it's the one we have, the one we live in. And the scanners won't be going away anytime soon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Houston & Chicago have them but don't appear to be using them --
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 06:04 PM by elehhhhna
at least not for domestic travel. Last weekend I flew both ways and it was the usual deal. But the machines were there. Reminded me of The Fly -- Cronenburg's version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Try fling into smaller airports like ISP, SNA, HVN, or PBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I think with the furor over these scanners and grope a dopes
the installation will slow WAY down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. They wont have them after the airlines start complaining about lost revenue.
Due to passengers not flying. It's all about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. LOL @ Tulsa
:rofl:

Why don't they fix their escalator first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC