Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Got A Reply from Politco, re: GOP January Meeting Lie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:39 AM
Original message
Got A Reply from Politco, re: GOP January Meeting Lie
I corrected the article at around 745 this morning. My mistake – and reporters do make honest mistakes from time to time – was assuming my recollection of the Baltimore meeting was correct. That assumption was buttressed by a GOP aide who has also misremembered the sequence of events.

What I remembered, incorrectly, was that Republican staffers felt ambushed by Obama’s late acceptance of their invite—what really happened was they were angry at his last-minute negotiations for the event to be televised.

The mistake wasn’t trivial but it doesn’t change the gist of the article: Republicans FELT burned and have nursed that grudge, even if it’s an irrational grudge. It is having a real impact on their willingness/reluctance to engage the president. It wasn’t an endorsement of their position, just a sentiment expressed to me in 8-10 interviews.

Thanks for the email.

Glenn Thrush


I'm no journalism expert, but isn't assuming and assumption a big no, no? I was told a long, long time ago by my boss, never assume anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mr Thrush can go Cheney himself
He could have checked Politico's own archives from January 29th 2010.
Politico knowingly posted a fucking LIE. Obama did not crash any ReTHUG meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. so, mr thrush took no notes at this meeting? he relied on his memory? F in journalism.
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 11:49 AM by spanone
this says more about politico than the article itself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Misspeak was the basis on which Politico
was founded. They deliberately screwed up from the beginning. Just my 2 cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Misremembered, the handiest of tools. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. and two people misremembering it the same way? What a coincidence
a truly lucky coincidence. What're the chances?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. So, even if Republican resentment is groundless, Politico will endorse it
I'm so old, I remember when journalists used to do this thing called "fact checking." The New Yorker magazine under Harold Ross was so famous for their thoroughness that the joke was often told that the New Yorker once called the Empire State Building concierge to make sure it was still standing before they ran a piece that mentioned the building.

Those day are very long gone, and Mr. Thrush apparently has no desire to see them return, as it would cramp his "journalistic" style, which is predicated on lying, and built on deception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dude's a propagandist and a liar
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 11:51 AM by alcibiades_mystery
And why is "how Republicans FEEL" the gist of a fucking news article anyway, even taking his explanation at face value. Who gives a shit how some group FEELS. Report the news, you asshat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. First mistake - assuming
he's a journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Did he talk to Democrats and admin officials to see what they remembered?
Or did he think his job was just to be a stenographer for the Republicans on this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. STILL LYING!x Last night Rachel Maddow did a superb report on this incident and the RW lies
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 12:10 PM by BrklynLiberal
that are trying to change RECORDED history.

There were no "LAST MINUTE" negotiations. It was all settled two weeks prior to the meeting.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/01/president_obama_official_sched_221.html

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/01/12/first-on-the-ticker-president-obama-to-speak-at-house-gop-retreat/


January 12th, 2010
03:07 PM ET

President Obama to speak at House GOP retreat.

Washington (CNN) – Rep. Mike Pence, chair of the House Republican Conference,said Tuesday that President Obama had accepted an invitation to address GOP members of Congress at the group's retreat later this month.

"House Republicans are grateful that the President of the United States has accepted our invitation to meet with the Republican Conference later this month," Pence said in a statement released by his office. "House Republicans look forward to presenting the president with our proposals to protect our nation, create jobs, control federal spending, lower the cost of health care, achieve energy independence and strengthen families."

The House Republican Conference is slated to meet in Baltimore Jan. 28-30.


Even POLITICO reported it...

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31408.html

Navigate:

* POLITICO
* Congress
* Obama to address House GOP

Main Content
Obama to address House GOP

By JAKE SHERMAN & CAROL E. LEE | 1/12/10 3:23 PM EST



The Repukes were totally humiliated in front of the cameras that THEY had agreed to allowed into the meeting..

http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2010/01/president-obama-speaks-at-gop-retreat/

Obama performed as well as any British prime minister during Question Time. The same cannot be said for the Republicans who, by and large, tried to use dishonest arguments and demonstrably inaccurate statistics only to have Obama tell them to get serious and stop trying to score cheap political points. I can honestly say that if as many Americans watched today’s Q & A with the Republicans as watched the State of the Union, our political problems would be over. If we had Question Time, we’d have a much easier time winning over public opinion and sustaining support for progressive policies.

The Republicans certainly will not want to repeat this extremely painful beat-down.



http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/29/russert-gop-obama/

Republicans dismayed by Obama’s strong performance, say it was a ‘mistake’ to let cameras roll.

House Republicans were fired up and ready to go for their conversation with President Obama at their annual retreat today. According to the New York Times, members of the conservative Republican House Conference said they were “itching to quiz the president and present their policy ideas rather than listen to another lofty presidential address.” Although such sessions generally occur behind closed doors, Republicans agreed to open it up after the White House said it was willing to do so. However, after Obama’s strong performance, some Republicans are now regretting that decision.


As Rachel said, merely saying something does not make it true....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. and the only reason the repukes are not attending the President's meeting is to show their arrogant
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 11:59 AM by BrklynLiberal
disrespect for him. and the office he holds. Any explanation other than that is a bald faced lie!!!

I truly hope that this little piece of theater finally pissed President Obama off enough for him take off the kid gloves and give the repukes the hard-assed treatment they deserve!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingOfLostSouls Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Hi my name is glenn thrush and I'm a lying piece of shit."
that'd have been an easier response for him to do and taken less time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. He is correct, but it is op ed, not journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. "buttressed by a GOP aide who has also misremembered" means "I'm their stenographer"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Rethuglicans felt burned
and nurse the grudge since the black man was elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. I hope this will lead to DU no longer finding quoting Politico as
something that we do.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC