Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawsuit Filed Today Against Department of Homeland Security and the TSA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 02:35 AM
Original message
Lawsuit Filed Today Against Department of Homeland Security and the TSA
http://www2.dailyprogress.com/news/2010/nov/16/rutherford-institute-sues-over-airport-screenings-ar-657490/

The Rutherford Institute has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Agency, claiming enhanced body search techniques at airports violate the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment.

The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from against unreasonable searches and seizures of “their persons, houses, papers, and effects.”

The lawsuit was filed after two pilots refused screening at a security gate by devices using radiation to “see through clothing” and create a nude image. Passengers who refuse the screenings are subjected to an “enhanced” physical search in which security personnel run hands and fingers over most parts of an individual’s body including breasts, buttocks, the inner thigh up to, and including, the groin.

“Forcing Americans to undergo a virtual strip search as a matter of course in reporting to work or boarding an airplane when there is no suspicion of wrongdoing is a grotesque violation of our civil liberties, undermining our right to privacy and to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by government agents,” said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, based in Albemarle County. “Indeed, TSA is forcing travelers to consent to a virtual strip search or allow an unknown officer to literally place his or her hands in your pants.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wish the Rutherford Institute every success with their law suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. ACLU will as well
We have a da threatening to file charges and the airlines are starting to feel it.

Two weeks, I hope I am readying this right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Finally!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk dont run Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Grope and Change.
I can't take credit for it, I read it here by another person. But worth repeating. Grope we can believe in.

We need to take back congress so that we stop this nonsense at HLS and TSA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's about time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's about time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder if some nudist group could sue too.
Why are we forced to wear clothes in public, when obviously our government wants us to get nekked so they can grope us...in public?

Can't have it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Who can't have it both ways?
Not sure I follow you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC