Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NATO: Combat role in Afghanistan could pass 2014

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 07:52 AM
Original message
NATO: Combat role in Afghanistan could pass 2014
NATO: Combat role in Afghanistan could pass 2014
(AP) – 2 hours ago

"There might still be one or two parts of the country where the transition process is ongoing and that might last into 2015 or beyond," Sedwill said. "This is the point about 2014, it's not an end of mission. It's not even a complete change of mission, but it is an inflection point where the balance of the mission would have shifted."

Two-thirds of all enemy-initiated attacks occur in three provinces — Kandahar and Helmand in the south and Kunar in the northeast, so those areas will likely be the last to be handed over, NATO officials have said, with 10 Afghan districts accounting for 50 percent of all the violence.

In addition, specialist strike units that target terrorist operatives are likely to keep conducting operations even after the Afghan government has taken over responsibility, Sedwill said.

He said both 2011 — the date set for U.S. troops to begin drawing down — and 2014 are "intermediate milestones" in a larger mission that will last much longer.

A summit of Afghan leaders and allies Lisbon this weekend will aim to set broad terms for that longer mission. NATO and the Afghan government plan to sign an agreement that will set out the international community's commitment to Afghanistan, including support for training forces, the growth of the Afghan military and intelligence sharing, Sedwill said.



unhappycamper comment: Oh goody. Only another half decade to go. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. On and on and on and on and...
On and on it goes. Who knew that you can't stop a war, it just keeps on going, almost of its own accord.

Except it isn't happening of its own accord, it's happening because President Obama:

1. erred when he accepted the fiction that this was "a good war";
2. erred when he promised to add troops to replicate the "surge" in Iraq (that has now been seen to be a failure);
3. her erred when he refused to admit that his A'ghan surge was not working; and
4. he is now making the mistake of refusing to pack up and withdraw from the A'ghan quagmire that is now his own creation.

Sad. And so avoidable. All he had to do when he took over was to admit the situation in Afghanistan is not repairable even with more and more troops, and begin the drawdown. Americans, especially those who voted for him, would have cheered and been invigorated by this.

Instead, his errors on the Afghan war are undermining/will continue to undermine his Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. k/r
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Don't worry. The US will be out by then. Promise kept. NATO, otoh, will be there for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gravel Democrat Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC