Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RED ALERT! HR-3808 Veto Override Attempt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
German Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:16 PM
Original message
RED ALERT! HR-3808 Veto Override Attempt
Source: http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=172452

They really are going to try to override the Presidential Veto tomorrow (11/17/2010)

GET ON THE PHONE TO YOUR REP AND SENATORS RIGHT NOW!

From 4closurefraud.com:

2:15 P.M. -
ONE MINUTE SPEECHES – The House proceeded with one minute speeches.

H.R. 3808:
to require any Federal or State court to recognize any notarization made by a notary public licensed by a State other than the State where the court is located when such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce

2:14 P.M. -
VETO MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT – The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President on H.R. 3808. The objections of the President were spread at large upon the Journal, and the veto message was ordered to be printed as a House Document No. 111-152. Pursuant to the order of the House of earlier today, further consideration of the veto message and the bill are postponed until the legislative day of Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2010, and that on that legislative day, the House shall proceed to the constitutional question of reconsideration and dispose of such question without intervening motion.

2:13 P.M. -
The House received a message from the Clerk. Pursuant to the permission granted in Clause 2(h) of Rule II of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Clerk transmitted H.R. 3808, the “Interstate Recognition of Notarization Act of 2010,” and a Memorandum of Disapproval thereon received from the White House on October 8, 2010, at 12:55 p.m.

Mr. Scott (VA) asked unanimous consent That, when the House adjourns on Monday, November 15, 2010, it adjourn to meet at 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, for Morning-Hour Debate. Agreed to without objection.

Mr. Scott (VA) asked unanimous consent That, when a veto message on H.R. 3808 is laid before the House on the legislative day of today, then after the message is read and the objections of the President are spread at large upon the Journal, further consideration of the veto message and the bill shall be postponed until the legislative day of Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2010; and that on that legislative day, the House shall proceed to the constitutional question of reconsideration and dispose of such question without intervening motion. Agreed to without objection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which one is this again. cant' get the link to work right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. try this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
German Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. you mean the bill?
the link to market ticker works with me. HR 3808 is the bill that allows banks to evade the question of MERS and who actually has the note to a property by substituting a notarized statement in place of the actual mortgage paperwork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. It would affect a lot of cases other than foreclosures.
H.R. 3808 is a bad idea. Each state should license its own notary publics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Incredible.
Edited on Tue Nov-16-10 10:28 PM by Marr
I'll make my calls, but this is going to be very interesting to watch. Isn't it incredible how persistent and responsive the government can be when it's servicing Wall Street, instead of regular people? 'Ship of state turns slowly', my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes. Would be nice to see this kind of tenacity in passing a bill to help working stiffs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't know what this site is for if not info like this.
So, bump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is the exact kind of crap that calls for a vote of no confidence against the entire system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. HUGE K & R !!!
:patriot:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. 2/3rds vote in BOTH chambers. They don't have the votes to succeed. Don't worry! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. 2/3rds vote in BOTH chambers. They don't have the votes to succeed. Don't worry! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Carlin: "We aren't in the Big Club".
They are. Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kick


Kick and call


Kick and call...and so on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. A pocket veto can't be overridden
The technical route for a bill to become law: Congress Passes a bill -> President signs bill -> bill goes back to Congress, becomes law. In normal situations, the President has 10 days (excluding Sundays) to sign or veto a bill. If he does not do either, the bill is returned to Congress as if he signed it and the bill becomes law.

Here's how a pocket veto works:
If Congress is not in session at the end of those 10 days, the bill can not be returned to Congress. So the bill can not become law. Nor was the bill vetoed, so there is no veto for Congress to override. The bill enters limbo and has no way to advance to become a law.

Congress can pass a new bill with the same contents as the old bill, but that makes it a new bill - it has to go to the President's desk again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC