Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Medical marijuana patient with stage 4 cancer on health dept. rejection of his MMJ license

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 03:41 PM
Original message
Medical marijuana patient with stage 4 cancer on health dept. rejection of his MMJ license
Edited on Tue Nov-16-10 03:47 PM by asdjrocky
The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's recent rejection of nearly 2,000 medical marijuana patient licenses over a quiet rule change caused such an uproar that the department promised to temporarily reinstate licenses for around 1,300 MMJ users -- among them Larry Shurtleff, who suffers from stage 4 cancer. But he remains confused and anxious over the state jerking him back and forth.

"This has been just about unbearable on me," says Shurtleff, 53. "One day, I think everything's going good, and then I get shot back down again. I really don't know what's going on."

Some background: Amendment 20, the 2000 measure that legalized medical marijuana in Colorado, describes a physician allowed to recommend MMJ as "a doctor of medicine who maintains, in good standing, a license to practice medicine issued by the state of Colorado." But Senate Bill 109, a piece of legislation intended to clarify the relationship between doctors and medical marijuana patients, which became law in June, tweaked this definition, stating that a doctor in good standing must hold "a valid, unrestricted license to practice medicine in Colorado."

Beginning late last month, the health department began enforcing its understanding of the SB 109 standard. Since February or so, personnel had set aside recommendations written by doctors with either restrictions or conditions on their license, even though there's no specific mention of conditional licensees in the law. (Restrictions and conditions aren't synonymous.) Then, beginning late last month, they mailed letters to patients, informing them that their applications had been rejected because their doctors -- eighteen physicians were impacted statewide -- had been retroactively deemed unqualified to write recommendations.


the rest-
http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2010/11/medical_marijuana_patient_with_stage_4_cancer_on_health_dept_rejection_of_his_mmj_license.php

So I guess the Teabaggers in Colorado are up in arms about the government getting between it's citizenry and health care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Link, please. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oops, it's there now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC