Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leave terms like "caring" and "supportive colleague" the hell OUT of your resume

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 11:01 PM
Original message
Leave terms like "caring" and "supportive colleague" the hell OUT of your resume
http://www.awis.org/associations/9417/files/Hebl%202009-LOR.pdf

Recommendation letters that describe you to as being 'caring', 'sensitive' or a 'supportive colleague' are more often than not going to hurt your academic job prospects. New research has revealed that the use of such adjectives, which many associate with more feminine characteristics, can often be detrimental to the candidate. Analysis of 624 letters of recommendation submitted by 194 applicants for junior faculty positions has led to this finding. When applications were viewed without knowledge of gender and compared with those from similarly qualified candidates, committees tended to rank lower those candidates with referrals using 'feminine associated' adjectives. The research is supported by the National Science Foundation and has been published in the Journal of Applied Psychology. It implies that people writing letters of recommendation ought to think carefully about their use of wording.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. First, they went after my pee.
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 11:25 PM by stevedeshazer
Now, they're after my thoughts.

on edit: Not that I missed the point after having read the first two paragraphs of the document. Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. misogyny at its finest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Not 'mysogyny', 'psychology'.
It's not whether or not someone is a woman that matters in this case, it's that one possesses traits that are often associated with weakness, or 'lack of professional detachment' by the typical employer.

To be 'caring' means one can be taken advantage of. To be 'supportive of colleagues' means one can be treated like a doormat.

This is of course not always the case. I've seen many assertive men and women with these traits turn them very much to their advantage. Sadly, I have also seen many kind men and women treated badly and taken advantage of by selfish employees and managers.

Sadly, both men and women find themselves victims of this particular attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. er
New research has revealed that the use of such adjectives, which many associate with more feminine characteristics, can often be detrimental to the candidate.

did you miss that part? I'm not saying it in reference to the gender of the people who can be affected, but the association of traits with genders, those considered "feminine" automatically assumed to be DETRIMENTAL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That is correct.
We have a problem with the workplace attitudes.

The problem is that the 'sharp, cold, calculating, go-getter' image is preferred by most employers. Most employers view 'thoughtful, considerate, kind' people as ineffective. I disagree, but don't expect me to change their minds very easily.

That those latter traits tend to be viewed as 'feminine' is a flaw in perspective, but not an insult. It is not that those traits are considered 'feminine' that make them detrimental, and it is not at all, at least in my opinion, insulting to be considered 'caring'. Rather it is the traits themselves that employers often see as signs of ineffectiveness... gender having nothing to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. The use of words and phrases such as "fearless," "loyal,"
"racial purity," and "comrades-in-arms" will evidently be a lot more helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. 'racial purity'? what the fuck?
i guess some people have to make EVERY SINGLE FUCKING THING about race.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. This isn't as bad as it seems, I think.
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 11:52 PM by aikoaiko
I just skimmed the article, though. I should read it more carefully, but my initial impression was that agency is a very desirable quality in new faculty.

Examples of communal adjectives: affectionate, helpful, kind, sympathetic, sensitive, nurturing, agreeable, tactful, interpersonal, warm, caring, and tactful.

Examples of agentic adjectives: assertive, confident, aggressive, ambitious, dominant, forceful, independent, daring, outspoken, and intellectual.


I've been on a quite a few searches for junior faculty and we're looking for people with a fire in the belly, so to speak, to do a lot of difficult work. Sure, we need them to get along with the rest of the department too, but being "communal" won't get you tenure. Being "agentic" will definitely help.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmeow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. No - ask your letter writers
to leave caring and supportive colleague out of your letter of recommendation for a faculty position. Very limited and not generalizable findings. Important in the academic world, not relevant outside it.

Anyone who thinks academia is not gender biased has never worked in academia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. "He is a heartless bastard who will trample over anyone in his quest to increase profits.
At the same time, he is unfailingly obsequious to top company management."

I wonder if that would be helpful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Gee..
.... I would never use those words, even if they applied, anyway. It's a resume not a love letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. The USA Loves Its Macho, Alpha Males!
You would think that in 2010, people would have stepped out of their cavepeople instincts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Apparently you slept through the election season
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC