Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Felons Have A Vote?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:11 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should Felons Have A Vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. while they're in jail or after they're out?
in jail-no

out-yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomofthehill Donating Member (578 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Agreed, when they have paid the penalty, that's it, welcome back to society.
except they have to admit they are felons on every application they fill out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I think Inmates Can Vote In Maine And Vermont
But i'm not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Violent crime after jail? No. Non-violent crime? Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. The Bernie Madoff's who actually get convicted
should not be allowed to vote, no. Otherwise, I agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes
Without going into detail about the inequities of our justice system and the systemic as well as institutional racism that feeds it, I vote yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Indeed! Consider the disproportionate amount of blacks and Latinos in prison...
Denying the right to vote to inmates and felons is tantamount to virtual Jim Crow.

And I'm pretty damned sure the racist assholes that infest positions of power in the South and elsewhere know this and like it this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentauros Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
36. You might want to rethink your position
about the inequities of disenfranchisement for ex-felons in the South. Look at that link below about "voting as a felon". Only ten states out of 50 have permanent disenfranchisement of voting rights. Two of them are your neighbors to Colorado, i.e., Wyoming and Arizona. Only three states of what most Americans call "The South" these days have permanent loss of voting rights. Not even Texas takes them away forever ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. felons do have a right to vote in many states
It's a states rights issue. In some states, they have to petition the governor. Here's a list of requirements, state by state.

http://www.rockthevote.com/election-center/voting-ex-felon/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. consider the fact that justice is unequally applied for minorities...
...and that if all minority felons were disenfranchised, a HUGE proportion of the minority electorate would be lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
42. I Agree (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. Most states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. After they're released, yes
I think there are a lot of laws out there specifically to create felons so they can't vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Kind Of Like A Modern Day Jim Crow Law
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 09:23 PM by Dinger
Seems to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. Depends on the sentence. If you're due to be released mid-term, sure
If you will be in prison, nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes.
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 09:28 PM by saltpoint
Citizenship carries responsibilities and also privileges. If the society demands the first it must not withhold the second.

Redemption is an essential variable in the social contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:01 PM
Original message
Our Constitutional rights are not "privileges"
The right to vote is not a privilege, it is a guaranteed right---to all of us. Yet, who is told to act responsible, and who lives in privilege are two different groups.

Here's a bit of shorthand that may help you understand. There are those of us that are held to the responsibilities of the social contract, 98% of us, then there are those of them, 2%, that reap the privileges of the social contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. You made my night---thank you
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. - - -
:hi:

:thumbsup:

Kurt Vonnegut, among his very many extremely humanist comments, once suggested that humans being try to be more fluid and more kind than they often are. For me that would encompass the restoration of full citizenship to felons, per the OP's question in the poll. But of course it widens the circle much farther still, and is a far more inclusive model than the one usually visible in the United States.

I think one of the gauges of progressives opposition to Tea Party candidates is that we are almost uniformaly appalled at how stingy their circle is, when the model we'd prefer is the wider "Vonnegut" circle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Their rights should be restored upon paying their debt to society
Otherwise the entire purpose of rehabilitation and the finite nature of a sentence are both thrown in the crapper.

I'm talking once you are no longer under correction or probation and parole that you are once again a free citizen with the rights and responsibilities that comes with.

I don't believe in a sentence to a permanent underclass. If you do something that bad but no longer require custody then exile is order and I don't quickly come up with such crimes to fit that odd niche.

I consider this excessive punishment and of very questionable morality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. They never are
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 09:29 PM by Juche
I've never been arrested or convicted, but my impression is even after 'paying your debt' you still have tons of trouble finding jobs or living w/o stigma. The mentally ill alone make up about 25% of people in prison. Add in all the people arrested for minor drug issues or who made a mistake, regret it, and want to pay their due back (non-habitual criminals) and I'd guess 50%+ fit into those categories.

The sociopaths and career criminals on the other hand, they should be locked up. A tiny minority of criminals commit the majority of the crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oswaldactedalone Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. This is the way it is in NC
but many former felons don't realize it. I've heard the gamut of possible reasons why they think they can't vote, but once their debt is fully paid, they can vote in NC. They do have to re-register though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Very sane policy. Here you have to petition the Governor aka bribes and such, I reckon
with petty politics of the season dictating consideration at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yes, even while incarcerated.
Incarceration and conviction should not stop one from voting. It is a fundamental right. Taking it away only puts more of a premium on the ruling class using dubious reasons to felonize millions of likely voters for the other party.

We dehumanize our prison populations then wonder why they're animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yes if they are out of prison. If they are safe enough to live among us, why shouldn't they be
allowed to vote? Voting is being an active citizen in your community. We should encourage civic involvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. Decide either way and put it into law
The GOP likes it JUST the way it is.

They can exclude them if it's politically dangerous (like in Florida) or IGNORE them when things are going OK for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yes. According to the courts they have paid their debt and should be allowed to reenter society.
They will pay taxes. They will be subject to any law that is passed. They will do every other thing that is expected of a citizen of the USA. There is no reason for keeping them from taking part in the most important duty a citizen can perform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. While in Jail/Prison, NO
after release, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yes.
They're citizens, aren't they? Either throw them out of the country, or let them have a vote. It's unfair to let them stay here (and to continue sucking down the tax dollars from their post-prison labor) but to deny them the right to vote.

Either they ARE citizens--with all the rights embodied in that word--or they aren't. If they aren't, then revoke their citizenship and throw them out. Otherwise, after they've paid their dues to society, their rights should be fully restored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glen123098 Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yes even while in prison.
Reason being a bigoted law can make something such as sodomy a crime, and then homosexuals can have their voting rights taken away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yes. After they get out, they're still expected to work and pay taxes
on what they earn. It makes no sense to deny them the right to help choose the people who will determine their tax rates (taxation without representation...sucks.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. I'm not a fan of the idea of felons voting on the local level.
On the national level, the individual voter is so far from wielding influence that felons voting doesn't seem to pose any risk, the state is similar but to a lesser degree.
Local politics is a bit more of a give and take between citizen and official, and I wouldn't want judges to have to answer to felons in the voting booth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. Imagine having a district of 15K people with a prison population of 5K.
On a national level (or even state level) is one matter, but on a local level it could create serious situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yes, it's their country, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. Once they've paid their debt to society, they should have the rights...
to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
33. Yes I should.
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 10:31 PM by Iggo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
35. Even in the Soviet Union people in the gulag had the right to vote.
Interesting, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Yeah, the people in the gulag had a choice
between Communist Party Apparatchik #1, who sent to them the gulag; and
Communist Party Apparatchik #2, who would have sent them to the gulag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. If it's good enough for anti-war voters, it's good enough for the class enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
40. As many others have noted...
It's their country, too. They are expected to pay taxes and, therefore, should be allowed to have a say in what kind of representation they have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
41. Taxation without representation.
Isn't that one of the main reasons the colonies broke from Mother England? If they are no longer incarcerated, they should have the right to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
43. Keep in mind "Felon" is an arbitrary term
The state legislatures arbitrarily decide certain crimes are felonies and others are misdemeanors. And those who are sentenced frequently are poor and/or minorities.

There are still more of us than there are of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexwasp Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. It is not an arbitrary term - it has a specific meaning.
It means a person guilty of a felony, which is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison.

It may be applied differently in different jurisdictions (though the differences between what is a felony and misdemeanor are nowhere near as great as the differences in prison terms within the "felony" category), but it is not an arbitrary term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
44. Yes (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncommon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
45. After they are released, yes. In jail, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
46. Absolutely they should.
Felons are citizens, just like the rest of us. As such, the decisions made by our government affect them too. They should certainly have a voice in the process of deciding who represents them and makes decisions on their behalf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgodbold Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
48. Before you vote on my rights get a clue.
A new study by the Sentencing Project shows that some 800,000 people with felony convictions have been given the right to vote over the past decade, thanks to reforms to laws governing eligibility in 23 states. But at least 5.3 million felons of voting age remain disenfranchised," National Public Radio reported on its show,


http://www.sentencingproject.org/template/page.cfm?id=133

.
.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC