Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOX working a paranoid hysteria about non-existent issue of voter fraud.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 09:17 AM
Original message
FOX working a paranoid hysteria about non-existent issue of voter fraud.
Between now and Election Day, one of Attorney General Eric Holder's most important duties is making sure every eligible voter who wants to vote, can vote free from intimidation or coercion.

Unfortunately, it looks like FOX News commentators, Republican Party operatives and the Tea Party are making sure he'll have his work cut out for him. They are working conservatives into a paranoid hysteria about the non-existent issue of widespread voter fraud.

While the facts don't support these wild-eyed accusations, the "voter fraud" hysteria leads to the intimidation and harassment of eligible voters, usually in poor and minority neighborhoods, who are trying to exercise their basic right to vote.

What FOX News and the Tea Party activists are pushing is pure fiction, and the Department of Justice should refuse to lend legitimacy to these false accusations and to the right-wing groups building a media strategy around them.

Tell Attorney General Holder: Don't cave to the Tea Party — protect voters' rights! Click here to automatically sign the petition.

http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/holder_election2010/letter2.html?id=12032-445224-H_bwPfx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. A pre-emptive strike against the Rethugs
not meeting their midterm election goals.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. it may also be a strategy of accusing an opponent of doing exactly what they intend to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fox creating this hoax --Democrats stealing the election and
Media almost purple from breathlessness trying to convince
everyone how the Republicans are the best show in town
tells some of us: Those Republicans are not doing quite
as well as they would have you think. I guess Fox meeds
some excuse when the results come in.

If there had been absolutely no action on the part
Republicans and if the Teaparty did not exist, the
Democrats were slated to lose 25 seats. So the first
25 losses do not go to the Republicans. They go to
history. This is what happens to the governing party
in Mid Term Elections.

When you have to stir up hoases and constant division
in order to try to win, do not expect much good to come.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I posted something similar
Yesterday. Which narrative we are supposed to believe?

Landslide for Republicans


or



Democratic Party intends to 'steal the vote'.


It gives me hope.
That and if I recall correctly in 1994 the Republicans overall were down about 6%/7% prior to the election. I'm still digging for that precise number but I'm pretty sure it was touted as being a landslide for the left in 1994.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Two conclusions
1) They are paving the way for voter intimidation next Tuesday
2) They have internals showing that the "expected" Republican wave has been effectively countered, and they need a reason for why the House and Senate didn't fall into their clutches.

Likely both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Both. I think they know that they aren't going to take over either chamber...
...and they are laying the groundwork for lawsuits and or poutrage when they don't win.

The voters of this country may very well be pissed off at the economic situation most of us are in, but they aren't stupid enough to lay the blame for that anywhere other than where it belongs...at the feet of the rethuglicans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I hope you're right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Translation: they're worried.
This is good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truckin Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think early voting might have a lot to do with this.
This is only a theory but in the past many low income precincts would have fewer voting machines than wealthier precincts. We saw an extreme example of this in Ohio in 2004. Additionally, when there is only one day to vote, a work day, when many poorer Americans have two jobs, family obligations, etc., they may not be able to vote. This is a subtle form of voter suppression that has been going on for years in primarily Democratic areas.

Early voting makes it much easier for low income Americans to vote and we are seeing more Democrats vote in early voting than Republicans and this is scaring the hell out of the right. With more convenient voting, more low income voters are casting their ballots. Good for Democracy, bad for Republicans so they have to scream voter fraud even when there is little or no evidence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Republicans owned Diebold.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. I find it amazing that EVEN BEFORE THE ELECTION...
They are showing us their hand, that they intend to claim Voter Fraud. I mean, really...Isn't that a bit stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. My guess -- they are expecting a big loss.



"But that's the only way it could have happened!!11!"







:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC