Hmm? How To Interpret "Obama's Coalition Slipping As Election Nears" in NYT???

[stopbush]

It seems like a no-win situation for Obama and the Ds:

if the coalition stays together for Obama, well, they're just not enthusiastic enough to get out and vote.

HOWEVER, if these same once-enthusiastic-now-unenthusiastic voters slip away from Obama, they suddenly become very enthusiastic about voting for the Rs!

Make sense to you? Didn't think so.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39879515/ns/politics-the_new_york_times/

[Ozymanithrax]

1. For the most part, I can not see people in the Obama coalition...

joining the coalition of head stomping sexist racists.

[Chulanowa]

6. I dunno, some things I've seen...

In general? I agree. But I can think of a few people... ><

[bluestateguy]

2. nt

[county worker]

3. It's a huge push to discourage voting by Dems.

First it was the enthusiasm gap, then the gap is closing, now it's Obama's coalition is failing. Look for this all through the weekend.

[TomCADem]

5. Bingo! - The Narrative That 2010 Will Be The Year Of The Backlash...

...has been pushed 24/7 since President Obama took office.

[Arkana]

4. They've been pushing this crap for months.

Liz Sidoti, everyone's favorite RW AP reporter, wrote an article about Obama's "base" crumbling a few weeks ago. Meanwhile, even Gallup reports support for the President among Democrats at 80+%...

[ClassWarrior]

7. I interpret it at the bottom of a cage belonging to a bird with diarrhea.

NGU.

[Rex]

8. The NYTs eats the peanuts out of RWingers shit and asks for seconds!

Another M$M craprag trying to influence ANOTHER election with lies! Too bad they can't be held criminally accountable.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

9. What coalition?