Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Admin seeks stay of 'Don't ask, don't tell' ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:14 PM
Original message
Obama Admin seeks stay of 'Don't ask, don't tell' ruling
WASHINGTON – The Obama administration on Wednesday asked a federal appeals court to immediately suspend a judge's ruling that overturned the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays.

The government says it wants the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco to take action on Wednesday. The federal government is preparing arguments for the appeals court on why the ruling on "don't ask, don't tell" should be suspended while the case is appealed.

The Obama administration says it is in favor of repealing the law. However, the government says that letting the ruling of U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips to go forward immediately would be a major problem for the military.

Leaving the judge's decision in place now "would create tremendous uncertainty about the status of servicemembers who may reveal their sexual orientation in reliance on the district court's decision and injunction," the Justice Department said in its latest appeals court filing.

"Effectively developing proper training and guidance with respect to a change in policy will take time and effort," the court papers added. "The district court's injunction does not permit sufficient time for such training to occur, especially for commanders and servicemembers serving in active combat."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101020/ap_on_re_us/us_obama_gays_in_military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. when the words of a fierce advocate don't match the actions, the ACTIONS are always the truth nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fierce Advocate? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nan Hunter, 1st winner of the Dan Bradley Award, GLBT National Bar's highest honor, agrees w/the WH.
"I googled GLBT Legal Expert DADT Appeal and the first name that came up was Nan Hunter, first winner of the Dan Bradley Award, GLBT National Bar's highest honor posted that she thought that it has to be appealed for the same reason that DOMA challenges had to be appealed. Excerpts and links were posted here":
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=9311547&mesg_id=9311547

"The problem is that there is circuit court precedent upholding DADT that is directly on point."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=9354576&mesg_id=9355952

"Given the fact that 5 previous district courts have found it constitutional is probably the reason that leading GLBT legal authorities want an appellate decision, preferably a Supreme Court decision that would then be final."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=9354576&mesg_id=9356004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I get along so well with my Gay friends and neighbors, and never
had a fucking bit of proper training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Was desegregating the military best left to Congress with the Dixiecrats or
was racism just plain unconstitutional?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is not merely vicious
It's also stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC