Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PTC has a hissy fit over GQ's "Glee" cover because the adults posing play high schoolers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:39 PM
Original message
PTC has a hissy fit over GQ's "Glee" cover because the adults posing play high schoolers
http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b206618_ptc_gets_its_panties_in_twist_over.html?utm_source=eonline&utm_medium=rssfeeds&utm_campaign=imdb_topstories

PTC Gets Its Panties in a Twist Over Glee's "Pornographic, Pedophilia" GQ Spread

Read more: http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b206618_ptc_gets_its_panties_in_twist_over.html?utm_source=eonline&utm_medium=rssfeeds&utm_campaign=imdb_topstories#ixzz12vSBaJC3



If anything justifies a slushie in the face, surely it's this kind of nonsense.

Yesterday, GQ's requisite hit-it-big, do-a-sexy-photoshoot spread featuring Glee hotties Lea Michele, Cory Monteith and Dianna Agron hit the Internet.

But while the snaps elicited the usual squees from teens and passing interest from adults, the ever-offended Parents Television Council had quite a different reaction: the conservative watchdog think it's tantamount to pedophilia.

The fact that the people involved are well past their years as minors—Michele and Agron are 24, Monteith's 28—seems to make no mind to the PTC.

Read more: http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b206618_ptc_gets_its_panties_in_twist_over.html?utm_source=eonline&utm_medium=rssfeeds&utm_campaign=imdb_topstories#ixzz12vSR3il5

____________________________________

Are these PTC people off their rockers - again??!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Screw that...
I want to see Finn wearing the undies like Lea is wearing. (Though not pink!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Hell, let him wear the pink ones just for shits and giggles.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why does the guy have all his clothes on?
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why the fuck are they looking at GQ in the first place?
The target audience is high school boys (and other guys with 8th grade mindsets). If the kids want porn, they can find more of the REAL stuff than they can use in a lifetime with a few mouse clicks or go get a cover off of a Cosmopolitan magazine. Besides, that GQ cover doesn't even qualify for "risque" - just "moronic".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. If this were pedophilia, it'd be illegal.
And the FBI would be raiding the GQ offices.

Has that happened? No.

PTC may find this disgusting, alright. But as far as First Amendment rights go (and child pornography is NOT protected under first amendment) this "simulated porn" type of stuff the PTC is decrying was decriminalized back in 2002 (see the US Supreme Court case Ashcroft v. ACLU).

Maybe the PTC members should move to Indonesia, where the publication of Playboy is straight up illegal...because of Sharia law (and what does that reflect about the PTC's values??)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC