Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How about this for a new rule:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:02 PM
Original message
How about this for a new rule:
The next rich fucker who makes $250K+ a year, hires a full time nanny and gardener, and complains about "not living in their means", gets to live on $10 an hour (or less) for the next five years. Only then can you actually have the right to complain about "living in your means".

Every week it's the same fucking bullshit. Some rich fucker complains about how "they're not living in their means" because of ridiculous taxes. First it was Ben Stein. OK maybe he's not the first but he's definitely part of a growing and scary trend, especially for someone who contributes absolutely nothing of value to society, aside from hawking products and being the "Bueller Bueller" guy. Then it was that guy from Illinois University. Then it's Rush Limbaugh - who actually fled New York to move to Florida because he was sick of paying high taxes.

They complain about paying taxes for services they're not using. Guess what? The rest of us do use those services. Freedom isn't free. Pay up. George Carlin was right - the rich make all of the money, pay none of the taxes. Then they complain about freeloaders. How's that for fucking irony?

"The I've Got Mine And Fuck You" crowd is the ones that are in control, not the proverbial "haves and have nots". The bottom line is that the rich are at war with the rest of us. I refuse to use the term "middle class" the same way I refuse to use the term "consumer". It's just words that the rich use to divide us, and then they can laugh all the way to the bank. I say if they keep complaining and complaining about not living in their means, they should get to live on the same wages as the rest of us do. I think that's the only way they'll even begin to understand our problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why 250,000? How about anyone over poverty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. do you want the middle class paying even more than what
we already pay? Take any more out of us, and you'll put us in the ranks of poverty.

The people making 250k are pretty well off and should have no problem living with in their means. The middle class are struggling to remain middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. I would guess that's exactly what he wants. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Define "over poverty".
The people making the $250K are the ones that are complaining. I don't hear anybody making below that complaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Do people over poverty complain because they have to choose between their nannies and paying
Edited on Sun Oct-17-10 03:17 PM by blondeatlast
their fair share?

No. No, they don't. Sorry that that subtle difference eludes you. We of the middle class get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. The rich do pay taxes. 42% of Americans pay no federal income tax.
If you are paying federal income tax I guess you are considered rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. I've both net paid (every year) and written checks to the IRS and never have broke 45k
I've made 15,500 and net paid. I net paid when I was a teenager working 16 hours a week.

It is certainly not only the rich that carry the load and make the wheels go round and round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. This guy said 47%:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. That would be an awesome experiment. Like the Dan Aykroyd/Eddie Murphy movie 'Trading Places'
But I need to temper that with the fact that there ARE people who have no budgeting sense and live outside of their means. They take out a mortgage based on the fact that the realtor/loan officer tell them that they can refinance in a few years before rates go up, and the underwriting is based on 2 incomes instead of one. One person loses their job, or decides to quit working to raise kids, go to school, illness, whatever and the original game plan is no longer applicable. I know many who have found themselves in this position. Yes, they were conned, yes, they didn't fully understand the loan program, but at the end of the day, they didn't think the financing plan through. This is a ~30 year commitment for most people and in many cases they don't take into account that their situation may change.

I put ~80-90% blame on the banks/mortgage brokers and the rest on borrowers whose eyes were bigger than their stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yeah, great analogy, I love that movie.
Yeah there are people that don't budget. One of my dad's friends started a business and absolutely had to have the latest and greatest everything - computers, vehicles, a fancy high-rise office, you name it. It didn't last very long to say the least. I definitely know a thing or two about not budgeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I volunteer as a budget counselor
I SOOOO wish people would ask people like us to sit down with them after the realtor has dangled the McMansion in front of their eyes for a "spreadsheet reality session" before they sign the papers.

There is so much heartbreak out there right now.

My biggest piece of advice is to average the borrower's salaries and limit the purchase qualification to that in case of job loss (or other incapacity) and limit the realtor to your budget, no matter how much they try to move you up the ladder. If the salaries are extremely disparate, lower the average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. part of it is 'i deserve this'. it's not so much about affording it as
deserving it. i watch these shows on tv where people are looking at houses and you can see they really want the biggest best one. i like when there are two people and they buy a five bedroom house. why do you need a five bedroom house? in the old days they used to buy a starter house and move into a bigger house when they outgrew the first one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Excellent point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. they are playing a dangerous game. see, as long as there is a middle class to aspire to....
there are people who are doing ok and the poor have something to hope for, then the rich are safe. but once the middle class is gone and there are enough people who can't feed their kids and living in squalor, then the rich are going to have to worry about more than living within their means. i am not making threats, i am just observing history.... when the rich have all the money and the rest of the population is struggling to feed their kids you end up with something akin to revolution. think of france and what happened to marie antoinette. it may take a while yet, but there will come a point where people at the bottom are going to look at those rich fuckers and decide that they have more than they need and they are sick of living in squalor while the rich live it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I am actually surprised we haven't seen this yet.
The great electronic babysitter is keeping it all at bay.

I remember reading a year or so ago that the iconic image of the current economic situation will be a family living above the grandparent's garage with the light of the TV shining through the one lone window.

You want to see people in the streets? Triple their DishTV/Cable bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I agree with your history context, but would add a unique American element to this
Americans have guns, so the poor will be armed.

The job opportunities for security services and body guards will skyrocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. you are probably right. it kind of scares me really. you see these tea party people so angry.
but the faux news shows have directed this anger towards the dems and 'liberals'. it should be directed at the 'representatives' but they have people so brainwashed right now.... now think about this.... imagine if there were no social security or medicare. that is what these folks want to get rid of isn't it? 'entitlements' as that lady on real time suggested without any more specifics. you want to see people rioting in the streets? those old folks at the 'we want our country back' rallies would shift their ire real quick if they lost THEIR programs. and i know they weren't ALL old people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. These idgets don't get that they are called 'entitlements' because people pre-paid for them
therefore they are 'entitled' to get their investment back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. it's for them, so it's not an entitlement. you hear people claiming
that social security is a ponzi scheme? medicare and social security are entitlements too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. i really hope the high school kids keep rioting here in France
in the local right wing bastion called "les alpes maratimes" a town called cagnes sur mer was the site of a wonderful riot between kids and coppers on friday, the kids threw rocks at the cops and pulled dumpsers and plastic garbage cans in the street and lit them on fire! all this as part of our national protest and strikes going on OVER RETIREMENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. It seems like thats where we're headed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
24. It is the new "let them eat cake"
I hope it ends as badly for them as the last person who tried it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
25. Kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC