|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 10:28 AM Original message |
"Obama administration back into sheltering the banking industry from the demands of an angry public" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. Rec'd. Reid really does have to stand with homeowners if we want to avoid Senator Angle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. K/R the President needs to do the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
3. "Wall Street not Main Street" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:02 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. +1. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
5. The President's defense of gov't funded Wall Street bonuses is likely the defining moment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
6. Rec'd. Very sad. People are getting thrown out on the streets and jerks are unrecommending. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
7. After reading the reports of how people are being treated in their own homes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
8. k&r! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
9. Unrec for fabricated quote in the OP subject...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. It's not fabricated. It's in the first paragraph. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:46 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Really?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:53 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Um, you're wrong. Quit digging. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 01:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. In what world... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Look up the word "fabricated". There is nothing worse than a sloppy pedant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:59 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. It's right in the first paragraph. It says that the WH finds itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. rec only to counter unrec on false pretenses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
12. I just rec'd. Why are people unrecommending this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Defending the interests of the obscenely wealthy is the "sensible" thing to do. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 01:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. Gets in the way of the propaganda and makes it harder to sell empty *hope*. Rec'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
17. Rec'd and still at zero. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
18. Witholding criticism til after the elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
19. k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
20. Latest survey finds only 7% of Amercans think Obama is too pro-business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 01:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. it's all about perception, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
disillusioned73 (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
21. Another waisted opportunity to unite the people (left, center & right(well maybe)) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. You can attack the Chamber, but not Wall Street where the big money is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-12-10 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
27. "The industry is minimizing this, and even the Obama administration is," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-13-10 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
28. Tim Geithner says foreclosure moratorium "would be very damaging". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC