Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Opinion: Conservatives Mislead in Health Debate - Newsweek

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 03:23 PM
Original message
Opinion: Conservatives Mislead in Health Debate - Newsweek
Edited on Tue Oct-05-10 03:24 PM by DearAbby
When, minutes after President Obama signed the health-reform law, 14 Republican state attorneys general asked federal courts in Florida and Virginia to declare the law’s mandatory insurance requirement unconstitutional, even conservative legal experts scoffed. Former Reagan administration Solicitor General Charles Fried, now a Harvard Law professor, told Fox News’s Greta Van Susteren that if the Supreme Court struck the law down, he would “be happy to come on this program and eat a kangaroo skin hat” he recently purchased in Australia. George Washington University professor Orin Kerr, who counseled Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn on Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s confirmation proceedings in 2009, gave challengers a “less than 1 percent chance” of success.

Unfazed, opponents ratcheted up their court fight. Republican officials from seven additional states joined the original two suits, while private conservative advocacy groups have brought at least 17 copycat cases nationwide. Further, opponents expanded their constitutional campaign to politics and the media. On all fronts, they have generally avoided frontally challenging the nearly wall-to-wall expert belief that the reform law’s “individual mandate” to purchase insurance passes muster with governing Supreme Court precedent. Instead, they have aimed at sowing doubt about whether, even if experts are right about constitutional law as it stands, existing precedent gives the federal government too much power. Toward this end, opponents have honed a set of core buzzwords and messages designed to reframe the debate and gradually shift the political and legal consensus. By the time the cases reach the Supreme Court, reform opponents hope it will seem legitimate for the court’s conservative majority to blow off judicial restraint, blow through loopholes in existing law, and effectively rewrite it.


More:

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/10/04/opinion-conservatives-mislead-in-health-debate.html

Edit : Too long preview, my apologies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. we're supposed to be happy with the mandates now? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC