|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
SargeUNN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 02:07 AM Original message |
When reason and justice are compromised no good comes from it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 02:15 AM Response to Original message |
1. It is the old arguement actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
2. They can put a lien on the property |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 02:29 AM Response to Original message |
3. Wouldn't it be more reasonable to impose a mandatory fee -- a tax, if you will? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 02:34 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. As far as I can tell Obion county is in Tennessee.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 02:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. The county could impose a tax and contract with North Fulton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 02:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Apparently it was 19-1 against a tax in the county... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustAmused (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 10:35 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. True, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
7. Because it costs more to levy the fine than it returns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 03:11 AM Response to Original message |
8. The problem with letting him pay after the fact is that it makes it even harder to collect the $75.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 03:14 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. This is what I've been trying to get across in other threads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
REP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 03:23 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Sadly, the outcome would likely be, "No need to pay; they'll put out the fire anyway"' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SargeUNN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 10:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. NO NO NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 10:37 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. they did it. it wasnt working. people didnt pay. not a mere 75. it is about collective pay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 10:45 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. There is some good evidence of that attitude from the news article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. It was a last resort. No one is supposing anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
REP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 03:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. I don't 'suppose' anything - I live here in America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
12. i am not hearing anyone say the FD did the right thing. i am hearing there is an issue with op pay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustAmused (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 10:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Thank you sea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. I think the conclusion here is just that making critical services opt-in / out is a mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
18. Correct, Sarge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
19. A private insurer wouldn't sign you when your house is already in flames. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SargeUNN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
20. I find it disturbing that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
REP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-05-10 03:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I was born the year after Kennedy died |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC