Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who gloats over those struck by disaster, however ignorant or irresponsible?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:43 PM
Original message
Who gloats over those struck by disaster, however ignorant or irresponsible?
Since when did smug schadenfreude become our scene? Society ought to provide certain protections against catastrophe, and the most essential of these should not be in the business of judging who among the victims is deserving. Whether it's fire, a hurricane, or a heart attack, certain essential services should protect everyone as far as is practicable and settle any breach of conduct afterward. Everyone--from abominable Grand Wizards to adorable Tiny Tims.

Disagree? I'd like to know why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're right, society should...
If you're referring to the fire in TN though, that county voted 19-1 against such protection in the case of fire..

It's not shadenfreude to point out that people get the government they vote for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And you know the voting habits of the guy who lost his home? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It is more of a moral hazard to put out the fire than to let it burn
Edited on Mon Oct-04-10 10:52 PM by divideandconquer
The city would be bankrupted by county moochers. I wonder how many people would support their tax dollars being used for elective medical care for illegal immigrants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Christ, how common are house fires in your neighborhood? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeshuah Ben Joseph Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. In My neighborhood? Not common at all.
Not a lot of fires in Heaven. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. I have a station right down the road, close enough I can hear the sirens..
They get called out several times a day on average..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Several fire calls to your immediate neighborhood a day on average?
And your neighborhood's as sparsely built up as a typical rural area?

Pull the other one, it's got bells on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Where did I say my area was rural?
Half my county is nearly urban, the other half almost rural, I live in the urbanized portion..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Then your experience has no relevance to a rural environment. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. When I moved here twenty years ago it was rural..
One of the fastest developing counties in the country for quite a few years..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. He is probably a Republican and bitches about taxes all the time.
He actually reminds me of one of my uncles who hated "The Government".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Leaving aside the whole "it's okay if something bad happens to The Enemy," evidence? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Libertarian thought is the enemy of civilization and this proves it very well
Edited on Mon Oct-04-10 11:04 PM by divideandconquer
Libertarianism is the opposite of humanitarianism. It's a shame this poor towns fire department got a bad name because of Libertarian parasites forcing them into a no win scenario. Do you think this hasn't happened before and the fire department didn't get paid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. I'm still seeing lots of assumptions here
People decided that this guy's situation means he's their ideological enemy to the point of rejecting his own explanation because of course the lying liar would lie about it, yadda yadda yadda. This whole subthread is based on the assumption that anyone living in a town that's getting jerked around by Randroids must be one themselves, which is a claim of staggering hypocrisy coming from residents of many American states (and no shortage of Canadian provinces, for that).

Basically I'm not seeing humanitarianism at all in the discussions about this guy, just a whole lot of mind-reading and defenses of privatized emergency services because they finally hosed someone we decided we aren't supposed to like - as though our liking him or not is the least bit relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. The county voted for this libertarian philosophy
The county is even more responsible than the homeowner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. What does that have to do with the county getting the government it voted for?
19-1 against gives pretty good odds that this guy didn't want to pay the taxes for fire protection..

Indeed, he didn't pay a nominal fee either, more evidence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You're suggesting he got what was coming because he voted for that
I see no evidence about what he voted for one way or another, and "odds" aren't good enough to declare facts there.

Plus, he claims he simply forgot about the fee, but I assume you'll decide he's lying because it supports your narrative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Right, hes going to go on national TV and declare that he deliberately didn't pay..
He's shopping for sympathy, I feel for the guy that he lost his home, I wouldn't wish that on anyone.

But the fact remains that you have to draw the line somewhere, should the city provide fire protection for the entire county gratis?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Your mind-reading skills are fascinating. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. He was reminded twice.


South Fulton city manager Jeff Vowell said people always think they will never be in a situation where they will need rural fire protection, but he said City of South Fulton personnel actually go above and beyond in trying to offer the service. He said the city mails out notices to customers in the specified rural coverage area, with coverage running from July 1 of one year to July 1 the next year.
At the end of the enrollment month of July, the city goes a step further and makes phone calls to rural residents who have not responded to the mail-out.
“These folks were called and notified,” Vowell said. “I want to make sure everybody has the opportunity to get it and be aware it’s available. It’s been there for 20 years, but it’s very important to follow up.”
Mayor Crocker added, “It’s my understanding with talking with the firefighters that these folks had received their bill and they had also contacted them by phone.”
http://www.nwtntoday.com/news.php?viewStory=46801
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
49. We know his nonpaying habits. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
54. he was interviewed by keith and said he forgot. i believe him. I
loathe fires. I feel for all of them, even the dummies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. At a certain level of harm, it's necessary to protect people from the fruits of their ignorance
You would agree with me there, I imagine. Or is it an absolute thing for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
50. and when the choice is to vote for the shithead or the other shithead?
If the parties would put forth candidates to vote for who actually give a shit about the people you might have a point.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wait until the next wildfire in Orange County, CA
You'll get your answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because this incident proves libertarianism is an unworkable crock of crap
Edited on Mon Oct-04-10 10:49 PM by divideandconquer
Already thousands have actually died because of Libertarian policies, some guy loses one of his properties isn't the same as someone being denied healthcare or unemployment benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And, weirdly enough, it shows how popular that sort of thing is among DUers. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Not at all...
It shows how many of us are surrounded by these people and know all too well how they think.

Provide them with fire protection they don't have to pay for in taxes or fees and they'll laugh at the city that provides it when it goes bankrupt and call them stupid liberals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I see it all the time in Georgia, teabagging scum laugh at city finances as they mooch
Edited on Mon Oct-04-10 10:59 PM by divideandconquer
Libertarian mullah Neal Boortz wanted Katrina victims to prostitute themselves rather than take government help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Boortz is not a libertarian..
Oh, he used to be a long time ago but he went full metal wingnut when he got syndicated and the really big bucks started to roll in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
46. Boortz uses the Libertarian paradise as way of poisoning practical political discourse
Edited on Mon Oct-04-10 11:49 PM by divideandconquer
I wish he would put his money where his mouth is and build a Libertarian paradise in one these poor rural southern counties. Won't ever happen because Libertarianism is totally impractical and this accidental Libertarian incident shows how impractical and immoral it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. I used to listen to him long ago when he was at WRNG..
He's always been a first class asshole but he used to be a hilariously funny asshole, now he's not funny any more, he's just an asshole and a dishonest one at that.

His shtick changed a lot when the big money started rolling in, I got the impression a long time ago that he mostly believed what he said, now it's all an act designed to keep the money flowing in, I don't think he believes a word of it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Did you hear the guy say his son had had a fire up at his house also.
Why were they burning near the house? Was the wind blowing? What were they burning? Why was a child allowed to do this? Well, I don't know if it was a child but he did say it was his grandson. Did the grandson start the other fire as well?

These people seem like a danger to themselves and their neighbors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Libertarian policy isn't popular. The failure of libertarian policy is being relished though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Your name should be Pious. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. How do you know what it means to that family?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree. Except for hipsters, they should not ever be given assistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. quoth the hipster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Me?! HELL NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Um, assholes? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. Who? People who have lost their own humanity.
Selfishness seems to have replaced empathy.

In this case they could have billed him. Pathetic excuses for human beings and a disgrace to firefighters everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. Who's gloating?
The Cranicks had a horrible thing happen to them - their house burned down. The fire department showed up, made sure everyone was safe, put out the fire that had spread to house that had paid its assessment, and they were done.

Yes, society should provide certain protections. But for the last 30 years, millions of people have heard and fallen for the "something for nothing" siren song of the low tax/less government libertarian right. When people refuse to pay the taxes that support basic services, what other possible outcome could there be? It's not "gloating" to note the absolutely predictable and necessary consequence of such a short-sighted political philosophy that hurts the most vulnerable of our society. Indeed, it could not be otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1620rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Yeah, and I guess a doctor should let a patient die if he has no HI and can't pay up front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I've seen that parallel drawn a couple of times
But I fail to see how it applies in any way. But if it makes sense in your mind, more power to you. I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Why doesn't it apply?
You (not you in particular) could have bought health insurance when you were healthy. It wouldn't have cost that much--you're young and healthy. But you didn't. How many 25-year olds get that sick, anyway?

But then you feel a lump. It turns out to be cancer. Thank goodness they caught it early. Your survival odds are excellent. All you have to do is pay $100,000 for the treatment.

You can't afford that! And now nobody will treat you because you can't pay. And of course nobody will insure you because you need $100,000 in medical services immediately. And society shouldn't have to shoulder the cost--if you got free treatment, we'd have to treat everyone who got cancer. Why should I have to pay for your negligence? You gambled, you lost.

Maybe next time you'll choose differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. It happens every day in America, dozens if not hundreds of times..
People die for lack of medical care by the thousands here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
40. Other scenarios...
What if the fire had been started by a neighbot's lawn mower? Would this elderly couple still have deserved their fate?

What if it was arson by a couple of bored kids? Then what?

I agree with the OP--obviously the family should have paid the fee. The system is rotten, and should never have existed. But the idea that anyone deserved to have his or her house destroyed, along with everything of sentimental value to them, and forced to pick up the pieces in their retirement--well, that's way too stiff a penalty for such a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
41. The gloaters have infiltrated DU under the libertarian guise. You
You have to wear thigh high bullshit repellent boots to enter here. This is one of the worst things I've seen on DU. Karma is a bitch for those superior beings on this board who don't give a shit about
your fellow man regardless of their political affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. No one knows his political affiliation but we know the county voted for a libertarian solution
Edited on Mon Oct-04-10 11:43 PM by divideandconquer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #41
52. I agree - one of the worst
Although I shouldn't be amazed anymore. I'm still reeling over the applauding of the fascist health insurance law.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
42. I wish I was there to help the guy save his animals and belongings
Shame on the firemen who just watched this happen, for whatever stupid reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
47. No one who has compassion.
The key word in this dialog is EMERGENCY.

If there's an emergency, we react first and worry about payment later. That should be true for police assistance, fire assistance, and medical emergencies. When the accident happens just outside the city limits, the police should not refuse to respond upon learning the accident is outside the jurisdiction. They should respond until the county sheriff's personnel can take over. If it's a fire, the city department should respond, particularly where it does respond to those who have subscribed to city service by paying a fee. If the home didn't pay the fee, they can still be charged for the city fire department making a run to put out a fire.

We put out home fires because failing to do so threatens more homes, and it fouls the air badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
48. Rotten people, that's who. And yes, it IS gloating.
Disguised with the old "them law is them law" vomit-inducing attitude.

Rotten. Rotten, one and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
53. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC