So what did the DU think of Elliot Spitzer's new show on CNN. I give it

[applegrove]

a thumbs up. Reminds me of DU. And Spitzer certainly dominates with his brilliance.

[defendandprotect]

1. Wow ... what time is it on????

What was the topic today -- guests???

[AlinPA]

5. They were talking about the teabaggers and had on Breitbart.

Spitzer and the woman were actually praising the teabaggers along with Breitbart.

[defendandprotect]

14. Spitzer was praising the T-baggers? On same basis that Breitbart was praising them???

[AlinPA]

16. I couldn't tell the difference.

[defendandprotect]

18. Shocking ... I've been a Spitzer fan .... sorry to hear that -- !!

:) thanks for the replies!!

[Raine]

2. It might be ok, they seemed a little uncomfortable with each other

and a little forced but as time goes by they'll probably get into the groove more. I really like Spitzer, I'll have to get use to her.


EDIT: .... Actually I don't want to ever get used to her so on second thought I'll stick to KO.

[AlinPA]

3. Terrible. I saw two minutes of it tonight. Having Andrew Breitbart on there does not

put that show at a level of professionalism.

[Submariner]

4. Don't ever forget what the ignorant Douche-bag sitting across from Spitzer said about Liberals

Liberation tastes like crow to anti-war crowd

April 13, 2003|By Kathleen Parker, Sentinel Columnist

What was that whimpering sound? Oh that. It's just the "Yes, but" crowd formerly known as the "antiwar pundits." Ignore them.

Saddam's statue had barely hit the ground in central Baghdad before America's armchair doomsayers began harrumphing a new caveat in which to couch this unseemly turn of events. One might almost think they didn't want Saddam to fall.

You couldn't help noticing the careful balance the antis tried to strike between reluctant admission and preachy admonition. The formula goes something like this: "Yes, we defeated Iraq, BUT . . . let's not get too carried away, it ain't over yet."

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2003-04-13/news/030...

[UTUSN]

6. Huh?!1 I didin't watch & never will, but he don't deserve a highpaying chance. n/t

[virgogal]

7. + 1

[AtomicKitten]

8. Brietbart's presence as a guest made it unwatchable. nt

[Raine]

10. Yeah

I'll stick to KO I don't need to listen to that kind of crap.

[northoftheborder]

9. Thanks for the reports.

I couldn't watch tonight, didn't get home in time. I can't stand Parker, but will give it a chance, depends upon the guests. I WILL NOT watch anyone remotely in the class of Breitbart. So, we'll see.

[valerief]

11. Breitbart? I guess they don't want Spitzer's show to succeed. nt

[Monique1]

12. I'll stay with MSNBC

[valerief]

13. Me too. nt

[xchrom]

15. i loved spitzer -- didn't like the breitbart thing at all.

but as a general rule -- i'm always going to enjoy what he says -- like i loved his interview with the guy
he prosecuted back when.

very good and interesting exchange.

[suston96]

17. Changed channels when not so Breitbart showed up. nt