Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Book the Pentagon Burned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 11:47 AM
Original message
The Book the Pentagon Burned
Edited on Thu Sep-30-10 11:47 AM by davidswanson
The Pentagon spent $50,000 of our money to buy up the first edition of "Operation Dark Heart" by Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and destroy every copy. The second printing has lots of words blacked out. Wikileaks claims to have a first edition, but hasn't shared it. However, reading the bleeped-through version reveals plenty.

Shaffer and others in the military-spying complex knew about U.S. al Qaeda cells and leaders before 9-11 and were prevented from pursuing the matter. Shaffer believes they could have prevented 9-11. He so informed the 9-11 Commission, which ignored him. The Defense Intelligence Agency retaliated against Shaffer for having spoken up. We knew this, but the book adds context and details, and names names.

The bulk of the book is an account of Shaffer's time in Afghanistan in 2003, and the title comes from the name of another aborted mission that Shaffer believes could have and should have captured or killed al Qaeda leaders at that time in Pakistan. Shaffer blames the CIA for screwing up any number of missions, for working with Pakistan which worked with the Taliban and al Qaeda, for counter-productive drone attacks, and for torturing prisoners. He also describes the insanity of General Stanley McChrystal's scheme of sending armed soldiers door-to-door to win hearts and minds and flush out "bad guys."

Shaffer doesn't say whether people he helped capture were tortured, but proudly recounts helping murder people and interrogating people without using torture. He does, however, detail the interrogation he did of a man whom he repeatedly threatened with shipment to Guantanamo. Bleeped out throughout the interrogation are repeated references to what is almost certainly the man's identity as an American.

Shaffer's book describes a web of incompetent rival bureaucracies within the military as well as the overlapping "intelligence community." What's remarkable about this gang of gung-ho heroes and obedient cogs is not that they do so much damage but that any of them remain proud of having been a part of it.

Shaffer sure as hell does. He wants the drones to stop and the war scaled back, but he wants the kind of operations he favors to be pursued under an all-powerful commander in both Afghanistan and Pakistan -- legal niceties be damned -- until military "victory" can compel the negotiation of "peace." The twelve pages of advice on "How to Win in Afghanistan" that Shaffer tacked onto the end of the book, and on the basis which the book has been marketed, is a hodgepodge of contradictory recognition of hopelessness and insistence on prevailing.

This book has it all. And to think that all this nearly perished in the flames --Blacked-out passages are represented below as BLEEEEEEP--:

Models of heroism instilling confidence in our leaders:
"On Friday afternoons, three of my friends and I would hop in a car and drive the 100 miles to Tucson, drinking a fifth -- or two -- of vodka along the way. Soon, I was working counterterrorism missions in the United States and Europe while still in the army reserves and having the time of my life. . . . I started having blackouts: I would start drinking in one place, wake up in another place, and not know how I got there. . . . --S--ome of my bosses drank as much as I did."

Deep insights into human motivation:
"We'd come halfway around the world to deal with an enemy that cared about nothing but their narrow interpretation of God. They wanted to kill us simply because we did not think like they did."

Dramatic tension and vegetable references:
"My team was gonna take to it like an eight-year-old to asparagus. We'd BLEEEEEEEP recruited a scout to help smooth our way with the villagers, but the CIA had maneuvered him out of the picture. Now we were going to be on our own without a native guide. Freakin' CIA."

Exemplary and tragic stands taken on principle:
"The CIA, it turned out, was running its own game, a game they didn't bother to coordinate with anyone on the Defense side of the house. At one point, I was to learn later, we had an ugly experience with a warlord who was on their payroll. It was not that they played against both sides. It was the fact that they did it so obviously and poorly that pissed us off."

The worst cliff-hanging ending to a chapter ever:
"Shortly after that meeting with Dave, our informants told us of a chilling development. Bearded men, riding on Honda motorcycles, carrying Kalashnikov rifles and satellite telephones, were driving along the trails of the deep, treeless valleys in Zabul province about 100 miles southwest of Bagram. They were on their way."

The worst beginning to the next chapter that could have been conceived of, with or without depicting people as insects or rodents:
"The Taliban were reinfesting southeast Afghanistan."

Measured use of violence:
"'What is your consideration of collateral damage?' he asked. 'None,' I replied. 'According to our information, there appears to be only true believers present with the target.'"

A keen eye for detail:
"For a moment, it was interesting to contemplate the Taliban as a bunch of Fred Flintstones. Nah. I couldn't recall ever seeing a fat Taliban."

Subtle foreshadowing:
"The same circumstances would reoccur: coalition and Afghan forces fighting to take ground in hundreds of villages like Deh Chopan throughout the region, holding it long enough to push out the Taliban, and then leaving, only to see the Taliban reemerge in the district unopposed."

Passionate romance:
"I had been told by several friends about finding troops 'doing it' in cramped spaces like the small bomb shelters around our tent living area and Porta-Johns. Yeah, Porta-Johns."

Clever imperialist banter:
"'Wow,' I said. 'But that's Indian territory.' I gave them the street location. 'It's the heart of where the bad guys are hanging out these days.'"

Realistic unflinching looks at the front lines of the battlefield:
"We had to get back to Bagram before dark. Besides, the mess hall served Alaskan king crab on Friday nights, and you had to get there early before it got too rubbery."

Even subtler foreshadowing:
"The graveyard sat on a high plain that overlooked Kabul against a backdrop of brown and gray rock mountains. Faded green Soviet vehicles -- T-64 and T-72 tanks, BMP armored personnel carriers, BRDM armored cars, and more -- were stretched out on a tan flat plain as far as the eye could see. Row after row of them."

Inverted literary allusions based on movies:
"I thought about Willard's journey up the river and into the 'heart of darkness.' Maybe we were going to have to do something to get at these guys where they lived; the remote area where Kurtz called his home was as remote as Wana to us."

Insights into local customs:
"Dave and I put on our 'Hajji hats' -- flat-topped Afghan hats worn by the local men."

Massage cream sources that threaten national security:
"I'd never given a massage in a combat zone before, but I dug out some hand cream with lotus flowers that I'd picked up at the BLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP and figured it would do in place of massage oil."

Hints of a sequel:
"We have to become involved in helping to shape and improve the message of the true Muslim faith."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burnsei sensei Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. So the Pentagon has tried to suppress this book?
I don't believe their efforts will succeed.
They will ultimately fail-- it is just a matter of time before the contents of the book come to be publicized.
There is not a thing hidden in this wide world that does not get exposed at one time or another. So suck it up, Department of Defense!
In a government where so much is out of formal control, I think it is only a matter of time before a purge of some type becomes necessary and is carried out.
The only question is: what kind of purge will it be?
Who will be purged?
And in what manner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. My god; Does this deaf, dumb and blind man, this agency, these agencies, this country,
know the meaning of looking into the mirror.

"We'd come halfway around the world to deal with an enemy that cared about nothing but their narrow interpretation of God. They wanted to kill us simply because we did not think like they did."

Never has the old southern shibboleth of sorts "pot callin' the kettle black" screamed more loudly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. + 1 n/t



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. We came halfway around the world to deal with an enemy that cared
about nothing but their narrow interpretation of God.

Apparently a narrow interpretation of God is enough to attract lots of foreign military attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Panaconda Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. When I first learned of this book last week,
I searched online for used copies and found two at independent booksellers.

Received an email that the book has been shipped and my VISA is charged.

Here's hoping it is a true first edition (as described by bookseller) rather than the redacted version.

There was nothing at the bookseller's site that suggested anything contoversial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. You probably bought a redacted one. The one I was looking at two weeks ago was $250.
Edited on Thu Sep-30-10 09:31 PM by Hissyspit
And I just couldn't swing it. Now I kind of wished I had gone ahead and charged it. This was two weeks ago, so it is possible you bought one of the new redacted ones if you were not charged much. The unredacted ones were ready to ship three weeks ago and there usually was some mention that it was the first pressing. But others had preorders of the redacted going at the same time. I'm not sure how you will be able to tell the difference right away without carefully comparing the copies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. A Disgusting Business, a Disgusting Book, and a Bunch of Disgusting People
America's finest, my foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hmm, almost as if Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld wanted 9/11 to happen all along...
My only question is whether it was LIHOP or MIHOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is this the Anthony Shaffer who was involved in the "Able Danger" business?
Yes, I see from Wikipedia that it is. He always seemed like a questionable element in that context, too. Claims that didn't add up, implications of sinister conspiracies within the government, connections to Crazy Curt Weldon. Just too much crap.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Shaffer_%28intelligence_officer%29

Anthony Shaffer is a U.S. Army Lt. Col who has alleged that the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) failed to properly evaluate intelligence on 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta. Shaffer's allegations subsequently became known as the Able Danger controversy. In October 2003, according to his later statement to Congress, Shaffer told the 9/11 Commission staff director, Dr. Philip D. Zelikow, that in 2000 a DIA data-mining program known as Able Danger had uncovered two of the three terrorist cells eventually implicated in the September 11 attacks. Shaffer reportedly told Zelikow that DIA leadership declined to share this information with the FBI because military lawyers expressed concerns about the legality of doing so. Shaffer also asserted that he briefed Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet on three separate occasions regarding his unit's activities. The 9/11 Commission Report did not mention Shaffer's allegations, but in 2005 and 2006 the Chairman of the House Select Intelligence Committee, Rep. Curt Weldon, publicized Shaffer's allegations in public statements and hearings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. And not a mention of Able Danger in the 911 Commission Report
Proof that at the very least the 911 CR was coverup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. David - How much BLEEEP is there in the A-D sections?
And, what are some the names named that we might not have seen before? What does Shaffer have to say about Steve Cambone's role in closing down the Able-Danger program? I've read that Cambone sat in on the critical meetings with the DoD lawyers and decided not to share the A-D files with the FBI. How much would you say is really new in there?

Also, I wouldn't be too hard on Shaffer's literary stylings - he's a retired intelligence analyst, not a staff writer for The New Yorker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. fair enough
but it's not just badly written, it's badly thought

yes, the parts on Able Danger are heavily redacted

but so are all mentions of the NSA and some of DIA and of JSOC etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Thnx. It will be interesting to see what DIA and MID thought should be redacted.
when we compare the two versions. Now, that will be meat for a good story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. 9/11 would have been easy to prevent
All that would have had to happen, is for someone in our government on or about 8/6-7/2001 to notify every airline, "we have reason to believe a major hijacking plot is about to take place. From now until 12/31/2001, if anyone displaying any of the warning signs of a typical hijacker (purchasing one-way plane ticket with cash, no luggage, extreme nervousness during preboarding or check-in) attempts to board one of your aircraft, detain them for questioning by security."

IF THEY WOULD HAVE KEPT THE HIJACKERS OFF THE AIRPLANES 9/11 WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED AND THERE WERE SO MANY RED FLAGS FLYING OVER THOSE ASSHOLES YOU'D HAVE THOUGHT IT WAS THE SOVIET MAY DAY PARADE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Keeping George W. Bush from stealing the White House would have helped a lot, too.
We live in the stupidest fucking period in American history. There were earlier really stupid fucking periods in American history, but we earn the crown now overall because we had all those earlier periods to learn from and we apparently didn't learn a damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. It's worse than that - CIA knew the identities of at least 2 of them - Flt. 77 hijackers
al-Midhar and al-Hazmi met several times with the others in the months leading up to 9/11, at a time the FBI I-49 Unit was trying desperately to convince the CIA to turn over their al-Hazmi and al-Midhar files.

This was no surprise to anyone, except the public who were not protected. Criminal negligence, at the very least, right up to the Very Top. Tenet had a face-to-face with Bush about this on August 17th or the 23rd. It's all on the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. k&r! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC