Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barney Frank Wants All Troops Home From Iraq: 'What The Hell Are They Doing There?'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 07:29 AM
Original message
Barney Frank Wants All Troops Home From Iraq: 'What The Hell Are They Doing There?'
Barney Frank Wants All Troops Home From Iraq: 'What The Hell Are They Doing There?'
Ryan Grim
ryan@huffingtonpost.com | HuffPost Reporting
First Posted: 09-24-10 11:07 AM | Updated: 09-24-10 11:07 AM

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) called on Friday for President Obama to bring the 50,000 troops remaining in Iraq back home to the United States, arguing that it's inappropriate to deploy troops trained for combat in a non-combat situation.

"What are they there for, if it's not combat? To monitor elections? To mediate religious disputes? Let's get them home," Frank said at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. "What the hell are they there for?"

Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said that designating the troops "non-combat" does not persuade insurgents not to shoot at them. Frank made his remarks as part of a broader critique of the U.S. military's presence across the globe.

He rejected the notion that America is "the indispensable nation," that it must be a global cop that responds to trouble all across the globe. "People've gotta learn to dispense with us," he said, adding that if it could be shown that U.S. involvement across the globe is beneficial, he would reconsider the position, but, in general, he said, U.S. intervention only backfires.

The defense budget, he said, "ought to be cut very substantially," suggesting that basing 15,000 Marines in Okinawa is no longer necessary and a "cultural legacy of the Cold War."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. same question the iraqis are asking.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Amen to that, Rep. Frank!
And why aren't more Americans demanding that our global occupying forces return home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Somone should have a serious conversation on the entire cold war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. ever wonder just where some of those lost billions went in iraq?
Edited on Sat Sep-25-10 07:44 AM by madrchsod
could it be 4 billion to purchase solid gold tiles for this--


http://www.bassamsebti.com/2010/09/new-golden-domes-what-about-people.html


i used google translator

http://www.non14.net/display.php?id=10592


there`s very few iraqi bloggers left in iraq. i can find just a few left that have stayed. most are in the west ,other middle eastern countries , quit, or disappeared.

even the planted cia/usa military bloggers are gone.

iraq-the forgotten war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyByNight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. What are they there for?
Three letters: O-I-L. Coincidentally enough, isn't the US military the largest single consumer of oil in the world? Per Jeremy Scahill (paraphrasing), the remaining 50K troops signify a downsized, rebranding of the occupation.

The current imperial posture is, simply, unsustainable. The Pentagon budget is nothing but very narrowly targeted economic stimulus. Chalmers Johnson's books, Nemesis and The Sorrows Of Empire, are very enlightening (and a little depressing).

Dismantle the empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Can't disagree with him but what about those
in Korea and Germany?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. They're doing a RIP/TOA with Iraqi forces so they can take over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Add Afghanistan to the same question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good on him!....I'm glad someone brought up the point of cutting the defense budget.
It's freaking bankrupting us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. I agree with the Congressman, it's time to bring them
all home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. Proud to STAND with Barney on this!
"The defense budget, he said, "ought to be cut very substantially,"

"If we don't fight hard enough for the things we stand for,
at some point we have to recognize that we don't really stand for them."

--- Paul Wellstone


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FraDon Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bring 'em home; bring 'em home.
… no longer necessary … if ever they were. (Unless your portfolio grows from the misery of others.)

'What The Hell Are They Doing There?'

The question of every age. Keep on, Barney!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. We have troops stationed all over the world, and ships sailing in every ocean all the time.
It's about time we stopped.

It is crazy and it is killing our people at home for no fucking reason.

I am a veteran, and I support military action when and where it is needed, but I don't see any real need anywhere in the world right now, other than a rearguard action in Afghanistan to make it easier to get us out permanently sooner.

If you need diplomats, send them. If you need "peacekeepers", call on the UN. We must stop pointlessly policing the world while our people are suffering at home.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. We must stop pointlessly policing the world
but dontcha know we have to protect our interests??? life is suffering after all...:sarcasm:

you are so right it's time we stopped! :fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. Besides never should have been there, here's what they're doing:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. US troops are guards for war profiteer US corporations and Barney KNOWS THAT nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. They're there to improve their tans. The guns are just fashion statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. K&R! //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. In Iraq?
Guarding "our" oil. :sarcasm: In all the other far-flung outposts and provinces of the Empire? Just protecting "our" other interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. As a rep, he ought to know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC