Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

how would the republicans pay for the extension of the bu$h* tax cuts for the rich?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:46 PM
Original message
how would the republicans pay for the extension of the bu$h* tax cuts for the rich?
Edited on Thu Sep-23-10 05:47 PM by spanone
they don't have a single answer to this. yet this is their 'pledge'

will the media ask them?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. The republicans never paid for them during Bush's 8 years-Bush & the republicans just spent & added
Edited on Thu Sep-23-10 05:56 PM by LaPera
it all to to the deficit for the next administration - And the deficit grew almost six TRILLION dollars when big spending Bush finally left office on Jan. 20, 2009 - The Deficit raising NO-Jobs Produced, Tax cuts for the rich!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wouldn't laugh
They'll find a way to make US pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. the laugh was for the media asking them...i doubt it
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ah. I'm caught up now. Thanks.
:hi:

(they will make us pay for it, though)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. of course they would....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cut Social Security
and any other programs that help the poor and middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. They do have the answer and no one is pushing them on it.
There is little reason for them to push it this side of the election. The poorest pay for the tax cuts of the rich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeW Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. im guessing that since
They have been focused on the government hiring new employees they prob. would push to cut a bunch.

They dont like us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Laffer Curve / Trickle-Down Theory will take care of it.
Because all the poor, noble, overtaxed, underfunded-and-almost-destitute banks/CEOs/wealthy stockholders will have LOTS OF NEW CASH which they'll surely turn right around and INVEST in NEW ENTERPRISES and IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING ENTERPRISES which will EMPLOY LOTS OF PEOPLE who in turn will also PAY TAXES which will ELIMINATE THE NATIONAL DEBT and even give the government a SURPLUS which they will then use to REDUCE TAXES EVEN MORE until NOBODY has to pay taxes and everything will run PERFECTLY just like A GIANT PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE and EVERYBODY will FROLIC in the GOLDEN WOODS where the trees are laden with MONEY FOR ALL.

Amen. (Did I miss any salient points?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. the media will only tell their audience that the democrats are raising taxes.
Edited on Thu Sep-23-10 06:22 PM by spanone
i did hear mitch mcconnell asked this question and his answer was that 'we shouldn't change tax policy in the middle of a recession'

a non answer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. David Gregory pushed that question pretty hard a few weeks
ago with Turtle Head and never got an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. I have heard their answer to this. "Cut government spending"
which, of course, many people do believe it "out of control". Now what I do not hear answers to is where they intend to cut, and no one is giving THAT answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. by decreasing debt-just ask my senator
Congress must stop debt
Published: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:21 AM CDT
Kay Bailey Hutchison
U.S. senator

Will Rogers, known worldwide for his cowboy brand of wisdom, once offered this sensible advice: “If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.”

Today, America is in a historically deep hole of debt, and though common sense would dictate a cut in spending, the Obama administration and Democratic leaders in Congress continue to drive our deficits up and our nation further into the red.

Over the last two years, discretionary spending ��“ that is, funding that Congress can direct to non-mandatory programs ��“ has risen by 17 percent. When you factor in the $800 billion “stimulus” bill, the increase in discretionary spending is actually 84 percent. The national public debt hit an historical $13 trillion dollars in May. If the spending continues at its present rate, at the end of Obama’s first term, he will have added an additional $6 trillion to the public debt.

A bipartisan group of Senators are calling on leaders in Congress to stop digging ��“ or in this case, spending. A proposal offered by Republican Senator Jeff Sessions and Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill would impose badly needed budget discipline by setting caps now for discretionary spending through 2014, except for defense spending. At this time of war, we need flexibility to fund our efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq, ensuring total support for our armed forces.

Discretionary appropriations represent 43 percent of the federal budget, so if we set caps now, it would substantially rein in federal spending over the next few years. The proposal has come before the Senate several times over the past year, and a majority of Senators have voted to impose the spending caps. Every Republican and 17 Democrats have voted for the Sessions-McCaskill proposal. This is a clear indication of the broad concern over federal spending levels. Unfortunately, we have not been able to meet the three-fifths majority (60 votes) necessary to move this important legislation forward.

As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, which sets funding levels for the federal government, my committee colleagues and I are well-positioned to lead efforts to reduce overall spending. In July, all of the Republican members of the committee sent a letter to the Chairman, Senator Daniel Inouye, asking that we work together to produce appropriations bills that reasonably address fundamental government needs in a fiscally responsible manner. The Republican committee members also pledged that we would not support any of the committee’s spending bills that exceed the levels proposed in the Sessions-McCaskill spending freeze. True to our word, we have voted against every appropriations bill that would raise discretionary spending.

Our earnest commitment to fiscal discipline is important for several reasons. First, the enormity of the federal debt poses a direct threat to our national security. Foreign entities own over half of our nation’s privately-held debt. Owning $843.7 billion in U.S. Treasury securities, China is the greatest foreign shareholder. This makes our nation beholden to foreign interests, and gives them powerful economic leverage over the United States. We need only to look across the Atlantic to see what happens when a government can’t keep up with its debts. European countries like Greece, Spain, Ireland, and Portugal, which have long lived beyond their means, are in such states of debt that the value of the euro is plunging and compromising the stability of global markets.

Second, this culture of unrestrained spending is breeding uncertainty here at home, specifically among American families and small businesses. This hinders our broader economic recovery. To pay for the federal spending spree, the administration and some in Congress propose allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire at the end of this year. This would amount to the largest tax hike in our nation’s history. Faced with the prospect of a heavier tax burden, many commercial operations are hesitant to plan or invest and consumer spending may slow. Business owners large and small have told me they are postponing hiring decisions until they have greater confidence in the strength of the economy.

The time has come for Congress to stop digging America deeper into debt. An immediate step we can take is to cap discretionary spending. The modest proposal we have offered would reduce deficits by $300 billion over 10 years and begin to put our financial house in order. We must also make sure that the tax burden of American families and businesses is kept low so they can facilitate economic recovery through investment, job creation, and careful spending of their own money.

Kay Bailey Hutchison is the senior U.S. Senator from Texas and is the Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm with you.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC