Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1 in 5 urban gay men with HIV? Does this mean

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:01 PM
Original message
1 in 5 urban gay men with HIV? Does this mean
they aren't practicing safe sex? Or that safe sex isn't as effective as it's supposed to be?

http://www.salon.com/life/aids/index.html?story=/news/feature/2010/09/23/us_med_aids_urban_gays

A government study found one in five sexually active gay and bisexual men is infected with HIV, and nearly half of those infected don't know they have the disease.

The study is considered the largest to look at urban gay and bisexual men at high risk for HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. More than 8,000 men in 21 U.S. cities were tested and interviewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think that more people are living with HIV and safe sex isn't being practiced as much as it should
It's a crap shoot all the way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. There's a dynamic in the system that accounts for that
Guy meets guy.
Both get tested.
Both show up negative.
Both fuck each other without condoms (neg tests give "permission" for unsafe sex)
One cheats and is afraid to tell the other, and continues unsafe sex as it would reveal the infidelity to change the sex practices.
Both wind up HIV+

Lather, rinse, repeat.

I know this because I've experienced the demand to get tested so we can fuck unprotected. And several close friends are having sex without condoms, having received recent neg tests. And many have seroconverted in this manner. Today, gay men, in general, are having more unprotected sex than a decade ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That dynamic is understandable -- tragic, but understandable.
Edited on Thu Sep-23-10 04:14 PM by pnwmom
And I guess the other factor is that there are better treatments for HIV now, so people are less worried about it.

Still . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree-when I was caring for AIDS patients in the early 90's there was a huge
protected-sex endorsement...free condoms sponsored by area gay and healthcare organizations.
it was very effective in the gay community.The IV drug abuse community-not so much.
The advertisement for this has pretty much disappeared...on to something more profitable,I guess.




2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulflorez Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Nothing wrong with using a condom in monogamous relationship.
There is a stigma attached to using a condom in monogamous relationship. A "you don't love me" or "you don't trust me" guilt.

Fight that stigma. There are more reasons besides cheating to wear a condom in a committed relationship. For straight people it reduces chance of pregnancy. For anal sex it reduces chance of infections.

Couples also need to talk about situations such as cheating and what to do. Agree to try to avoid snap judgments. Agree to see a counselor immediately if it happens. Recognize that "if you cheat and don't tell me, you could expose me to an STD and that will put an extreme amount of stress on an already fragile relationship".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I prefer condoms, myself
Gives more options, protects against more than HIV and let's face it, clean up is easier. Also, I have direct experience of several people who seroconverted while in a "monogamous" relationship that it's clearly foolhardy to believe that your partner can't be persuaded to do something you both will regret later. And that's not just HIV I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. That, and also
aids is no longer an automatic death sentence and people are becoming lax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulflorez Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Common sense...
Don't have UNPROTECTED sex until you are in a committed MONOGAMOUS relationship for 6 months and both of you have tested as negative.

If you are going to have unprotected sex outside of a monogamous relationship:
Use protection during anal sex!
Use protection during oral sex! (does anyone even bother to do this?)
Don't mix fluids, don't swallow!
Don't use drugs or drink (impairs judgement).

Better yet, wait until you are in a monogamous relationship with someone you trust and you've confirmed you are both STD free! You can't get HIV from someone who does not have it!!!

And educate, educate, educate! Promote this message like crazy and combat the message that frivolous, risky sex is fun and acceptable! Young people especially need to hear this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. That common sense is what is causing the high rate of seroconversions
"Don't have UNPROTECTED sex until you are in a committed MONOGAMOUS relationship for 6 months and both of you have tested as negative."

It's a fallacy. In this day and age, one must always use condoms. Period. One ought not to be laying their life on the line by trusting someone else. We must take personal responsibility and protect ourselves such that a partner's infidelity cannot threaten our own health. That advice goes out to everyone, straight or gay, young or old.

It's not about trusting the other person with your health, it's about being personally responsible for your OWN health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. That's what I've told my young adult children.
Edited on Thu Sep-23-10 05:40 PM by pnwmom
It's the best advice for everyone. . . . unless you're trying to get pregnant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Unfortunately, you can get HIV from someone who tested negative
a month ago -- and afterwards has unprotected sex with someone else. Two people confirming they're STD free only works if both are completely trustworthy and monogamous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. A little more education is good - there are several mistakes in your list
If you are going to have unprotected sex outside of a monogamous relationship: Use protection during anal sex!


Agree - not only that don't have sex outside your primary relationship if your not comfortable telling your partner. Communication can save your life.

Use protection during oral sex! (does anyone even bother to do this?)


There is very little chance of getting HIV from oral sex. If you don't have a cut in your mouth (flossing, cold sores etc) your chances are extremely slim (I think the documented cases where this cause HIV transmission is countable on one hand). The risk of dying in a car accident is 1 in 4,000 - getting HIV from oral sex is estimated at 1 in 10,000. (see: http://www.medhelp.org/posts/HIV-Prevention/Oral-sex-and-duration-of-contact/show/255592)

Don't mix fluids, don't swallow!


HIV can't survive the digestive fluids that are in your throat or stomach.

Don't use drugs or drink (impairs judgement).


I'd say don't use drugs or alcohol in an environment where you are uncomfortable or plan ahead. Its unrealistic to tell people not to drink or not to have sex.


All that being said - remember HIV is not the only STD you can get from oral sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Safe sex just means you think you are safe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. What do you mean by that?
Condoms are 100% safe against HIV if used correctly and don't break. You can catch other diseases but they are SAFE against HIV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think there are other factors involved.
Certainly gay and bisexual men are becoming more complacent because, with advances in research and the search for a cure becoming more promising, HIV isn't seen as a death sentence as it once was.

Also, education is a key factor. Safe sex programs certainly are not as supported as they should be, especially when abstinence-only advocates try to dominate the conversation and elimate the discussion of any alternatives for safe sex and means of protection.

Poverty and homophobia certainly have played a role in increasing infection rates as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Just because it is not the death sentence that it once was does not
grant permission to share it with someone who may well be disease-free.

This is true for any/all STDs, not limited to HIV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Very true.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not practicing safe sex
I live in San Francisco, and the young guys who didn't see AIDS up front when it was killing everybody just think it's a manageable, chronic condition that's "no big deal." Of course, that's not everybody, but I have seen some really prevalent attitudes around here to that effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I've been afraid that was part of what is going on.
People who don't remember what it was like in the late 70's and all through the 80's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. A moral sexually active person is aware of their HIV and STD
status and deserves reciprocal treatment. Caution until the relationship is monogomous and has lasted for more than 6 months is indicated.

I am heterosexual and my life, alas, has been serial monogomy rather than a lasting relationship.

However, I have gay friends that have had HIV for 20 years that have unprotected sex and use needles (I have never used needles nor a needle drug) but these are friends from elementary school. They seem to think that the drugs that prolong their life and sticking to fellow HIV travelers is OK.

My home town -- live there now but have spent 65% of life away -- has about 600 people. The most lasting relationship is between a American Indian and a scion of a logging family that got together in the late 1950s; they left here circa 1980 (I did earlier but returned for keeps in 2002-3). What was strange was that the ladies of my grandmother's church and card club (the Indian's mother and grandmother were members of the circle, the Dad one of the last 4 veterans of the local CCC camp of the 30s to pass on) accepted what they called "the boys" as did local timber industry "rednecks" in the 10+ years both worked at the veneer and stud mill back in the 60s and 70s. When the mill closed in 1973, one of the couple was the head of the local CETA program and the other a program boss. Never was there any predjudice by locals and to this day they have not offically come out nor participated in the gay scene but one has a thriving business of many years (on a offramp to Interstate 5) and a long term county job in another rural county.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I think the town as you describe it was operating on the DADT principle.
I wonder if the couple would have been as accepted if they were more outspoken about their relationship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. The older women refered to them as the "boys" chuckle chuckle
They were an obvious couple but some thing similar to DADT may have been a factor.

They had good reputations in an unusual small community that still generations in depth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. Younger gay men are less inclined/aware/afraid than older gay men.
Most of my gay friends are of my generation - old farts. We've spoken about this very phenomenon for years. When AIDS first hit, it was a SLEDGEHAMMER and people were very damned aware, afraid, and inclined to protect themselves. The same, actually, was true for heteros.

Not so much anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. It means the drug companies are winning
Edited on Thu Sep-23-10 06:32 PM by Stevenmarc
Look in any gay magazine at the drug ads and what's the message, some buff hunk rock climbing singing the praise of the drug company that's keeping him hot and healthy.

A new generation has seen a whole different face on HIV than we did in the 80's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Ugh. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC