Tea Parties identify themselves as savers. They have saved enough over the years to live comfortably on retirement if the rate of return was 7 or 8 percent. These relatively risk-free returns were "promised" to them by financial planning books and websites.
They are terrified as returns on cash are very low. In addition, the "markets" appear incredibly risky.
They are also terrified of future inflation and/or higher taxes.
In their view this set of events is due to the fact that "debtors" (who often live two houses down) are "winning" against "savers". They hate the notion of "bail-outs".
Of course this is very contradictory - interest rates are low because of the threat of deflation, not inflation. "Debtors" are being rejected by banks in 20 seconds.
And high risk free returns have never been possible.
We have had 30 years of economic conservatism (what Europeans call neo-liberalism). With this came "people's capitalism". Defined benefit pensions were eliminated and future retirees were left to their own devices. "People's capitalism" has turned out to be a "giant sucking machine" to take resources from the "savers" to Wall Street. What David Harvey calls "accumulation by dispossession". A huge factor in this was the notion of "risk free high returns" - this was the function of all of those CDOs, CDSs etc.
In any case 1 million or more in savings is still fairly good and people should be able to manage comfortably with the assistance of Social Security.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.