Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Judge Declares ‘DADT,,,Delete! didn't see it already posted!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 10:34 PM
Original message
Federal Judge Declares ‘DADT,,,Delete! didn't see it already posted!
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 10:35 PM by napi21
http://www.globalshift.org/2010/09/09/federal-judge-declares-dadt-unconstitutional/

A federal judge in Riverside, Calif. has taken the first step towards nationally undercutting the long-held policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” by declaring the military’s ban on openly gay service members unconstitutional earlier today. Citing the provision that it violates the rights of lesbians and gay men attempting or already serving, U.S. District Court Judge Virginia A. Phillips insisted that the policy had a “direct and deleterious effect” on the military.

The Act’s restrictions on speech not only are broader than reasonably necessary to protect the Government’s substantial interests, but also actually serve to impede military readiness and unit cohesion rather than further these goals,” she writes in her official memorandum on the case, the full text of which can be accessed here.

In her 86-page decision responding to the court challenge of the policy, Phillips, a Clinton appointee, also asserted that the 17-year-old policy violated the First Amendment rights of gay service members. “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” was heavily scrutinized during the two-week non-jury trial in July. The lawsuit was originally filed in 2004.

“The plaintiffs’ lead attorney, Dan Woods, argued ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ was unconstitutional based on the U.S. Supreme Court’s findings in the 2003 case of Lawrence v. Texas, in which the justices struck down the Lone Star State’s anti-sodomy laws, declaring sexual conduct constitutionally protected,” staff writers at The Desert Sun report. “Woods also said the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Witt v. U.S. Air Force so attenuated the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy as to make it virtually inapplicable.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC