Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grover Norquist's Wet Dream --- A Crash. A Call for Help. Then, a Bill.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 09:29 AM
Original message
Grover Norquist's Wet Dream --- A Crash. A Call for Help. Then, a Bill.
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 09:30 AM by kpete
A Crash. A Call for Help. Then, a Bill.
By CHRISTOPHER JENSEN
Published: September 3, 2010


ABOUT a year ago Cary Feldman was surprised to find himself sprawled on the pavement in an intersection in Chicago Heights, Ill., having been knocked off his motor scooter by the car behind him. Five months later he got another surprise: a bill from the fire department for responding to the scene of the accident.


Steve Kagan for The New York Times
VICTIM Cary Feldman paid for the dispatch of a fire truck he didn't request.

“I had no idea what the fire truck was there for,” said Mr. Feldman, of nearby Matteson. “It came, it looked and it left. I was not hurt badly. I had scratches and bruises. I did not go to the hospital.”

Mr. Feldman had become enmeshed in what appears to be a nascent budget-balancing trend in municipal government: police and fire departments have begun to charge accident victims as a way to offset budget cuts.

more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/05/automobiles/05CRASHTAX.html?_r=2&hp
via:
Reagan Revolution Contract on America Continues, Government Drowned in a Bathtub: Police and fire departments have begun to charge accident victims as a way to offset budget cuts.
The wet dream of Grover Norquist. The end of public services for the common good as a government responsibility.

http://www.buzzflash.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let's give Norquist and his believers and defenders
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 09:42 AM by blondeatlast
their own little piece of America and let them live in their govinabathtub Utopia.

They'd all end up slaughtering each other and we'd all be better off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is not real new where I live.
In 2002 or 2003 my son rear-ended a pickup truck at a stop light. 3 squad cars showed up, a fire truck and the first responders (ambulance). It was about four blocks from our house and I was there almost as soon as they were. The cops threw sand on the radiator water in the street and cleaned up the glass and plastic with a push broom. The bill we got for that cleanup and the response to a fender-bender was close to a $1000 dollars in addition to the cost of the tow. It was a shock since we pay very high property taxes and thought that they were going for services such as that. Apparently not.

For the record, I do not mind paying taxes to keep my city in good shape AND I want well paid Police and Fire Fighters and lots of them. But this gimmick of the City billing us for response and cleanup really pissed us off. The repukes were in full swing here when this policy was enacted with a repuke mayor (my husband's cousin, LOL).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Someone should try filing suit on behalf of the property tax payers in your town.
This has to be unconstitutional. What happens if you don't pay the fees, do they add them to your property tax bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't understand the concept of billing the VICTIM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Because they were called FOR him?
:shrug: That really is bizarre. But I don't understand the bill at all. Isn't that what we're paying taxes for? For these people to respond?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Grover Norquist? Isn't that Jane Hamsher's new BFF? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC