Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If the GOP/tea partiers shut down SSI

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JoDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 07:54 AM
Original message
If the GOP/tea partiers shut down SSI
and unemployment insurance, I plan to ask for a refund.

Why? I have been working taxed jobs for nearly 17 of my 33 years. Every paycheck, taxes for unemployment, SS and other programs have been taken out by the government.

These programs were meant to serve a 2-fold purpose: 1. To help the people who need it now. 2. To act as a de facto savings account for most workers. Ideally, we shouldn't have to worry about saving for hard times with these programs. The government takes our money as insurance payments, and then "pays it forward" with the promise that workers will get what they paid in back if they need it. New workers are supposed to replenish the fund, ensuring older workers get their money back.

So, if these programs are shut down before I hit a long stretch of unemployment, turn 65 or am declared disabled, that means my money will never be replenished to the fund. So I have lost my money. Cash I could have saved or invested on my own, or used to pay off my college and personal debts. I would be out tens of thousands of dollars.

Therefore, I think that should the tea party's dreams come true, I am owed a refund. If they don't cut me a check quietly, I intend to sue. Probably, I don't have a whole lot of legal standing here, but I will kick up as much of a fuss as one onry woman can.

Any one with me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Kill Social Security now. Smirk." - Rush DraftDodger Limbaugh (R - Propagandist)
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 07:57 AM by SpiralHawk
"And enact more, more, more, more Tax Cuts for Rich Republicons. More more more for us. Smirk."

- Rush DraftDodger Limbaugh (R - Propagandist)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's right.
The money we've paid in has been used for other purposes than SS payments. If we're being cut off then I want my money back. All of it. And I don't want to hear anymore lectures about patriotism from the likes of Alan Simpson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Our SS money was spent long, long ago
Your uncle spent the money your dad left you for an inheritance and when you grow-up to ask for your money to go to school the courts will order him to pay up at which point your uncle will use a cash advance on your credit to pay you back.

Dude, your uncle is a total jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Umm ... Social Security surplus?
Surplus means they've collected more than they've handed out. They used that extra money to supplement the general fund and spent it on everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. If there were a surplus that would be awesome
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- It's official: Social Security will reach its tipping point this year.

For the first time in nearly 30 years, the system will pay out more benefits than it receives in payroll taxes both this year and next, the government officials who oversee Social Security said on Thursday.


http://money.cnn.com/2010/08/05/news/economy/social_security_trustees_report/index.htm

And surplus or no, none of it was never intended for the general fund. It was supposed to be a trust fund.

Now if only we could find politicians we can trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. "shut down"? Has there been any indication that there would be a "shut down" of either of these?
I am sure there will be a recommentdation of cuts - but a "shut down"??????

I hardly think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. If the GOP takes over either house of Congress, there could be budget fights that lead to a
1995 style government shutdown. This could cause SS checks to be delayed, federal workers furloughed ect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. that is hardly a shutdown of social security
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. For seniors living on a tightly fixed income, it sure would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. no doubt it would be near-catastrophic for many seniors - but still not a "shut-down"
a delay in checks . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. My son who is in his fifties has said the same thing
he said he is going to sue the republicans and wants all the money back he has paid in for years. He said when he paid it in, if they go to privatization, that's not what they took it out for either and he is still going to sue. So if all the people who over the years paid in to social security threaten the same thing, there is no way they would be able to touch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. I am right there with you...no SS in the future? Give me my money back..
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC