Senate voting on Feingold/Reid amendment right no
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 09:54 AM
Original message
Senate voting on Feingold/Reid amendment right no
The Witch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's a very telling headline: "Right: no" ^_^
But what's up with Levin & Bingaman??? Very disappointed.
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 09:59 AM
Original message
Casey - No Tester - No Bayh - No McCaskill - No
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. LOL! Please, whistle, don't edit it! nt
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is it on the amendment or cloture?
Levin voted no even after speaking in support of it :shrug: Lincoln, Landreiu, Pryor, (and of course Lieberman) also voted no
The Witch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why did Webb vote no too??? :angry: :will call:
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Tester, Dorgan, Reed (RI), McCaskill...all no's
peacetalksforall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Given a whole bunch of Democratic no's already...
is there really any question how Nelson (NE) will vote? Clinton and Obama - Aye
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. LOL! I don't know why I bother, just wanted to be pleasantly surprised, I guess!
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Levin, Reid (RI), Tester (MT), McCaskill, Webb voting NO!
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Rockefeller and Lieberman, NO!
Inuca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. I am almost positive I heard Harkin AYE n/t
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. I guess I truncated the "w" , I meant now but the voting will be close
....and most likely partisan
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Not looking like it unless I'm missing something
Hearing a whole bunch of No's that I didn't expect. :grr:
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm not surprised, really. I figured a lot of Dems wouldn't go for this.
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm amazed at how many Dems DID!
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I thought it was kinda neat that Obama and Hillary both agreed to
support it--now it won't be a weapon in the campaign, by either of them OR by GOPers trying to exploit their differences.
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. what is on this amendment does it mention a withdrawal date?
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Essentially it cuts funds and has a withdrawal date.
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. why won't these senators take a stand on this???
cuts funds for March 2008 what is wrong with that?? not enough dead bodies perhaps?:sarcasm:
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sen. Byrd voted 'aye'.
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. thought I heard no - but then this was for cloture, not to adopt
But then, there's a whole bunch no's 29 yes 67 no
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Now McConnell claiming 'victory' over a 'surrender date'
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. Warner proposing fake accountably bill of Warners. Durbin says Warner bill
would allow Bush to do a signing statement where he wouldn't comply with it. Warner's bill is to have another "independent commission" to hold Iraqi's accountable by checking if they are abiding by benchmarks. A former General would be in charge of it.
peacetalksforall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
25. We're three days past Mother's Day and Father's Day is
approaching and we're still calling for killing off all those kids and maiming them, some for life. To say nothing about precious children getting killed in Iraq and millions of innocent parents.
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. why can't someone just stop this maniac we have the in WH??
European Socialist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed May-16-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. Glad to see them vote on it anyway...It's progress.
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.