Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do airlines x-ray passangers for domestic flights?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:28 PM
Original message
Do airlines x-ray passangers for domestic flights?
I'm thinking of going to the East coast for a vacation, but I will not be x-rayed by someone who is not a medical provider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Take a train
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Is that a yes or a no?
Since citizens of this country only exist to be mouths for consuming and hands for working, we only get enough time off to make sure we can keep doing those two things. Ergo, I really don't have 15 or 20 hours to kill on a train.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. the train is a delightful way to go - getting there is a relaxing part of the vacation!
Especially if you can manage to get a sleeper car... It makes the trip just about perfect!
We did this on a trip to Savannah - left after work, slept in tje sleeper car and arrived refreshed the next morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I already said I don't have time.
No sleeper car is available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. it's a YES, these other folks don't know what they're talking abt
on every single domestic flight in the usa you WILL be required to go thru a metal detector and you WILL receive some amount of ionizing radiation in excess of background

in some airports such as LAS and PHX you MAY be asked to go through a second device, called a full body scanner, and if you agree, you will AGAIN receive some amt of ionizing radiation in excess of background

right now, you are allowed to request a patdown instead of going thru the second device

however, EVERYONE, even the pilot of your airplane, goes thru the first device, the metal detector

you will receive some amt of ionizing radiation above background if you fly domestically, sheesh, i do this every fucking week, and some people do it every fucking day (the crew)

i'm amazed so many people don't know what a metal detector is

also because of the height at which commercial planes fly, you receive an elevated dose of radiation over what you would have received if you'd stayed on the ground

the classic example is the x number of cases of cancer in denver, colorado (the mile high city) each year that wouldn't have happened if denver was at sea level

life is risk, it's a small risk, but yeah, you asked a question and the answer to your question is that yes you will receive an extra dose of radiation from the metal detector, from being in a cabin at 35,000 feet, and (if you don't ask for the patdown) the full body scanner -- of the three, the full body scanner is the least likely because not in all airports yet, but metal detectors and jet airplanes ARE at all airports

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Defectata Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. varies by airport
each airport has its own security.

they have the millimeter wave scanners at Indianapolis, but not Nashville TN nor Denver, which is where I frequently fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes. They have them here in Phoenix.
Passengers are selected "randomly". It's my understanding that you can "choose" to be patted down instead. I won't do the naked X-ray machine, either. I hate flying these days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'd rather do the pat-down if available. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. the full body scanners at PHX (and now other airports) are a SECOND x-ray device
you cannot choose to be patted down instead of going thru the metal detector

you CAN choose to be patted down instead of going thru the nude-o-scope/full body scanner

i'm guessing from your post you don't realize it, but the metal detector ALSO exposes you to ionizing radiation

the OP seems to have a health worry, so either form of x-ray increases his/her exposure to ionizing radiation, the objection to the nude-o-scopes (pioneered as we all know at PHX) is that images of your nude body can be stored and shared around the internet (the TSA at first claimed that the images weren't stored but after a huge cache of nude photos was discovered they had to admit that they oops fibbed)

if the reason is an objection to being exposed to ionizing radiation, the OP can't fly domestically, you CAN'T opt out of the metal detector in my experience, instead you are told to go thru anyway (if you can walk) and then when it goes off because of your implant or whatever, THEN they pat you down

only the nude-o-scope/full body scanner is currently semi-optional (at some airports it isn't really optional, you comply or don't fly, according to reports i've gotten from other travelers)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I'm not concerned about conventional metal detectors.
I'm concerned about X-ray specifically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. How are magnetic fields ionizing radiation?
All metal detectors use magnetic fields to detect metal. Magnetic fields aren't even considered radiation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. BWI in Baltimore does not have them.
From there you have access to DC to Boston via train.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. yes you are x-rayed for domestic flights, in germany you ask for patdown but in usa?
FRA (frankfurt, germany) is the most paranoid airport in the world, but they do allow for you to say you are pregnant/have medical concerns and you can get a patdown instead

i wish we had that option in the usa because i am a frequent flyer and i prob. glow in the dark, we all know from health physics there is no safe level of x-ray exposure, even the background radiation in denver colorado causes so many cancers a year

i would ask for a patdown every time if i thought i could get away with it but on usa domestic flights what actually happens is you STILL have to get the x-ray, in addition to the pat-down

i really feel bad for crew, because they get x-rayed every single day, and yes, airline crew members (pilot, FAs etc) have an elevated risk of some cancers, just as medical providers (radiographers) do

i have no answer for you, i just figure i have to die of something and at least if i kill myself thru my stupid adventures i'll have some wild times to look back on :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I'm not sure what you're talking about.
I was stopped, declined the scan, and got a patdown. Nobody made me scan it anyway, and they didn't even give me a hard time about it.

If the DO ask why, just tell them that you've had a number of medical x-rays recently (or a CAT scan) and are concerned about your maximum exposure level. They won't argue with you. In my case, they didn't even ask WHY I didn't want to do it until I was already getting the pat-down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. I flew SF to Phoenix recently.
Got pulled for a check. I didn't want to be x-rayed, so they just did a pat down. No biggie.

While I was being searched, the TSA guy actually asked me why I didn't want to be scanned. I answered by asking him whether he knew what the maximum safe annual millirem exposure level was for a human being. He said that he didn't, so I just looked at him and said, "And that's why I don't want you using that machine on me. If you don't know what safe is, how can you honestly tell me it's safe?"

He just laughed and sent me on my way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. you got x-rayed when you went thru the metal detector anyway
Edited on Thu Aug-12-10 07:43 PM by pitohui
sure he was un-informed but so are you, no offense

it's pretty funny for people to talk about milli-rems who don't even know what it is themselves

yes, i'm a frequent flying nerd, but so be it...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. How is a metal detector x-ray?
Isn't that a passive detection device the same way a radio antenna is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Metal detectors don't use x-rays
Edited on Thu Aug-12-10 07:53 PM by Xithras
They work by generating magnetic fields that you walk through. If you have any ferrous items on you, the item will alter the magnetic field. Any alteration of that field will cause an alarm.

Heck, you can MAKE a basic metal detector using only a pair of headphones, a pair of CD-R's, and an old battery powered calculator, and a 9 volt battery. It's primitive, but it's the same physics used in airport detectors. No radiation involved, just magnetic fields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. That's what I thought. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes.
I was x-rayed in Salt Lake City. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. What's more, the big chemtrail corporations...
expose you to higher than normal background radiation while flying at altitude.

I say we break into the airports and stop on all the airplanes. Because we should be big supporters of organic flying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. shhh don't tell
it's hopeless these folks have no idea what the atmosphere is or that it's well known that at higher elevations you have a greater risk of radiation-related cancers

it isn't a great risk but it's there

to these folks, the metal detector is OK because, well, they're "used to it"

the new device is bad because they're not used to it

alrighty then

at the end of the day if you stroll thru a metal detector and get on a plane that will level off at 35,000 feet, which is known to (very slightly) elevate your risk, just as a medical x-ray, slightly elevates your risk, then i don't see the purpose of the question

i could see, "i don't want my nude scan all over the internet" but to pretend it's more dangerous than what you're already doing is absurd


but people are people, they aren't rational
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. I'd go to the airport in a thong if it would speed it up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Oh, I'm not talking about the atmosphere.
I'm talking about the secret metal detectors they have on the second floor of the plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Are you a doctor?
Can you guarantee that being x-rayed by what amounts to a mall rent-a-cop in addition to all the dental x-rays I get is safe? How much radiation do airport xrays produce? How does that compare to dental x-rays?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Yes, I'm a doctor.
And the harmful effects of radiation are neutralized by the anti-fluoride they put in the bloody marys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. You are, of course, free to believe everything the government tells you. (edit)
Edited on Thu Aug-12-10 08:04 PM by Deep13
I can't help noticing how much care actual medical professionals use in diagnostic x-ray. I wear a lead apron at the dentist's office and the operator always stands int he next room to turn it on. I also know that a lot of people have been killed by x-ray in the early days before the risks were known. So I will kindly ask you not to lump me in with conspiracy theorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Also, I'm the government.
The whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Actually, I was thinking of another word. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. Actually, we DO know the maximum safe level.
There isn't one.

Getting exposed to 15000 millirem a year will increase your cancer odds by 1%. Is that "safe"? Depends on how important that 1% is to you. That works out to about 300 medical x-rays, 900 dental scans, or about five CAT scans.

The backscatter machines dose you to about a thousandth of a chest x-ray, so it would theoretically take over a quarter million scans in a single year to increase your cancer risk by 1%. The TSA uses that number to claim that the machines are safe, but that ignores simple reality. Each scan increases your odds of getting cancer by 0.000003%

So, the real question you have to answer is: How important is a 0.000003% cancer risk to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. It is up to DSA, not the airlines anymore.
Airlines lost security rights/responsibilities after TSA was formed in the wake of 9/11.

Contact your departure (and if you smoke or otherwise need to go outside, layover) terminal to inquire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. you'll pass through a metal detector
and in some cases, a full-body scanner that uses terahertz waves.

It's an invasion of privacy, but no x-rays are involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. So there are no x-rays at the airport for humans?
What's terahertz? Radio?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. between radio and infrared
millimeter-wave is another name for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. we drove from texas to cape cod. and then from texas to SF.
last year and this year.

my hubby has to take a bet more time off, so we are getting longer vacations and we love seeing hte country and i love the freedom of it. all of us get along, so it isnt like the kids are fighting all the way.

i am so glad i stopped taking airplanes. i love driving on vacations, exploring with family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
35. How else are they to dispose of all that thallium and other reactor core waste? Airport X-Rays!
Agent Mike has a long-term contract with the thallium processing guild, so he has an interest in what gets said here. Everyone at DHS gets paid in medical isotopes these days, so better pack your Geiger counter with your tooth brush if you're flying.

This is nothing new. It started with Flouride-18 in the water in the 1950s . . .

:+ B-) :+ :nuke: :hide: :patriot: Happy chemtrails! :+ B-) :+ :nuke: :hide: :patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
36. I fly domestic all the time. Never, not once been x-rayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC