Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon to Troops: Taliban Can Read WikiLeaks, You Can’t

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 10:59 AM
Original message
Pentagon to Troops: Taliban Can Read WikiLeaks, You Can’t
Source: WIRED News

Any citizen, any foreign spy, any member of the Taliban, and any terrorist can go to the WikiLeaks web site, and download detailed information about how the U.S. military waged the war in Afghanistan from 2004 to 2009. Members of that same military, however, are now banned from looking at those internal military documents. “Doing so would introduce potentially classified information on unclassified networks,” according to one directive issued by the armed forces.

...

Now, the Marine Corps is telling its troops and civilian employees in a memo that “willingly accessing the WIKILEAKS website for the purpose of viewing the posted classified material (constitutes) the unauthorized processing, disclosure, viewing, and downloading of classified information onto an UNAUTHORIZED computer system not approved to store classified information. Meaning they have WILLINGLY committed a SECURITY VIOLATION.”

The other branches of the armed services have put out similar notices. The memos were initially reported in the Washington Times. But the story has been removed from the paper’s website.

...


UPDATE: “Take ‘wikileaks’ out of your headlines,” one Army contractor e-mails Danger Room. The web filter “has been updated to block anything with wikileaks in the URL.”

“So, yeah, common sense out the window,” the contractor adds.







Read more: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/08/pentagon-to-troops-taliban-can-read-wikileaks-you-cant/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. *facepalm*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orbitalman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ah Yes, freedom ot speech, freedom of the press. How sweet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veilex Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. This, unfortunately is fact, not fiction. I've seen the "memo"
It makes no sense to me. I see it as a desperate attempt to control what is already way beyond Government control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Like the troops could not email a friend and ask for them to
send it to them? Good God, the insanity among the brass, slays me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Wouldn't matter. It would appear they are using legal technicalities to make it clear..
...that ANY serving member of the armed forces who accesses this material, unless they are specifically authorised to view it in its "proper" place, can be charged with a fairly serious crime. And would not put it past the PTB to extend this to any reservists as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. One of my favorite mottos from the Corps....
"First to go... last to know."

Fits perfectly here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rozlee Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Just you try and make us!
As former military, I can say with total confidence that we were always like kids: tell us not to do something and we'd want to do it all the more. If the majority don't do it, a few wiseacres will find a way to get a hold of it and spread the love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. So the Pentagon has lost trust in the troops and has to censor their reading?
Sounds like it should be un-American to do that. The Pentagon brass are unfortunately more of the shit pile Bush left behind in his wake. Sadly President Obama is left to be the CIC of a bunch of incompetent ass-kissing pussies caught in a web of lies to the detriment of our service members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Adds validity to WikiLeaks. Like giving a PG or X rating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. get a better flow with w i k i l e a k s !
Edited on Fri Aug-06-10 11:49 AM by unblock
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. more accurately spamified as: w 1 k 1 l 3 a k s
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hey, that's the way to fight a war: keep your own troops uninformed ...
while the enemy can be fully informed.

NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. If you didn't keep them in the dark, they wouldn't be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. +1000000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. brilliant strategy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC