Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sharron Angle opposes "making sexual orientation a protected minority in civil rights laws"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 08:36 AM
Original message
Sharron Angle opposes "making sexual orientation a protected minority in civil rights laws"
AP Exclusive: No gay adoptions, says GOP’s Angle

By The Associated Press
Friday, August 6th, 2010 -- 4:29 am



AP Exclusive: Nevada's Angle outlines views on gays, school prayer in questionnaire.

Republican Sharron Angle believes the clergy should be allowed to endorse candidates from the pulpit and opposes laws allowing gays to adopt children, according to a questionnaire by the Nevada Senate hopeful that was obtained by The Associated Press.

Angle, who is trying to unseat Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, completed the four-page questionnaire for a conservative political action committee that has endorsed her candidacy.

The document provides a window into Angle's social and moral views, which would place her among Congress' most conservative members at a time of ongoing culture wars over gay rights, abortion and the boundaries between religion and government.

Among her positions, outlined in answers to 36 yes-or-no questions, Angle would oppose making sexual orientation a protected minority in civil rights laws. In a section on school prayer, she affirms that students and teachers should be able to talk openly about religion in schools, including the right to "publicly acknowledge the Creator."

http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0806/ap-exclusive-gay-adoptions-gops-angle/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bat. Shit. Crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. What a looney loon
:puke: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spartan61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sure, let the clergy support candidates
from the pulpit. But they must understand that this will cost them their tax exempt status.

As for allowing gays to adopt children, I have this to say. The children in my classroom who were adopted by gays were some of the most loved and cherished children I have ever seen. Wish I could say that about many of the children from "opposite sex" married families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Truly A Woman Of The 18th Century...
This babe represents the ultimate dumbing down of the right wing over the past 30 years. She's now the gold standard for intolerance, privilidge and outright stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Christian Reconstructionism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You need to start a thread with that
Every DUer should read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Ok
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. At this point, I think it would be easier to list the things
she supports than all the things she doesn't. :eyes:

It is difficult to believe that anyone finds her reasonable in any way, shape, or form.

She's not 18th century (those folks were actually quite forward-thinking for the age) - she's a perverse cross between the worst of the Victorians and the worst of the 14th century . . .

gah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC